Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1 Chaffey 38 949 273 136 70 108 .288 .346 .397
2 East Los Angeles 40 1072 331 196 105 130 .309 .384 .404
3 Mt. San Antonio 46 1262 494 335 103 86 .391 .444 .595
4 Pasadena City 41 1112 343 190 119 165 .308 .384 .405
5 Rio Hondo 39 950 250 107 76 137 .263 .327 .306
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1 Chaffey 38 38 237.2 334 251 194 5.71
2 East Los Angeles 40 40 247.2 344 217 172 4.86
3 Mt. San Antonio 46 46 286.1 194 103 77 1.88
4 Pasadena City 41 41 265.1 267 150 114 3.01
5 Rio Hondo 39 39 233.1 374 259 173 5.19
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1 Chaffey 38 1066 663 310 93 8 .913
2 East Los Angeles 40 995 636 300 59 5 .941
3 Mt. San Antonio 46 1120 851 227 42 7 .963
4 Pasadena City 41 1098 796 257 45 7 .959
5 Rio Hondo 39 1125 683 341 101 9 .910
Rk Team home games attend avg
1 Chaffey 16.0 25 2
2 East Los Angeles 18.0 732 41
3 Mt. San Antonio 22.0 1,974 90
4 Pasadena City 15.0 942 63
5 Rio Hondo 19.0 25 2
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1 Chaffey 12 302 88 41 25 34 .291 .353 .401
2 East Los Angeles 12 330 99 47 27 39 .300 .364 .361
3 Mt. San Antonio 12 337 150 116 25 13 .445 .497 .674
4 Pasadena City 12 339 116 67 25 45 .342 .397 .442
5 Rio Hondo 12 294 72 30 28 26 .245 .321 .299
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1 Chaffey 12 12 75.1 121 92 74 6.88
2 East Los Angeles 12 12 76.0 140 90 71 6.54
3 Mt. San Antonio 12 12 68.0 48 20 14 1.44
4 Pasadena City 12 12 76.2 91 56 40 3.65
5 Rio Hondo 12 12 77.1 125 84 60 5.43
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1 Chaffey 12 337 202 101 34 4 .899
2 East Los Angeles 12 297 194 82 21 2 .929
3 Mt. San Antonio 12 272 196 62 14 4 .949
4 Pasadena City 12 332 230 85 17 3 .949
4 Rio Hondo 12 378 224 120 34 2 .910
Rk Team home games attend avg
1 Chaffey 6.0 25 5
2 East Los Angeles 6.0 312 52
3 Mt. San Antonio 6.0 517 87
4 Pasadena City 6.0 392 66
5 Rio Hondo 6.0 25 5