Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.31985731272294887 1 Fresno City 23 841 269 182 126 56 4 11 71 152 .320 .432 .435 49 11 6 9 80 88 .91 1033
0.2978986402966625 2 Merced 22 809 241 136 93 42 4 13 59 174 .298 .392 .408 38 8 11 21 196 193 1.02 959
0.2908458864426419 3 Coalinga 25 863 251 141 94 40 9 3 52 215 .291 .389 .368 51 11 11 16 198 173 1.14 1030
0.28094059405940597 4 Sequoias 23 808 227 104 95 42 4 4 50 174 .281 .372 .358 30 14 12 22 176 186 .95 959
0.2684931506849315 5 Taft 22 730 196 129 94 30 7 11 48 145 .268 .367 .374 26 12 10 10 204 161 1.27 872
0.25744934445768775 6 Porterville 25 839 216 119 77 41 8 17 66 207 .257 .340 .386 33 9 7 9 164 223 .74 965
0.25153374233128833 7 Reedley 24 815 205 93 102 23 3 5 31 154 .252 .349 .306 26 11 15 25 248 203 1.22 969
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
207.0 1 Fresno City 23 207 366 41 15
166.0 2 Coalinga 25 166 318 84 21
156.0 3 Merced 22 156 330 34 2
146.0 4 Porterville 25 146 324 33 8
146.0 4 Taft 22 146 273 58 10
115.0 6 Sequoias 23 115 289 11 7
110.0 7 Reedley 24 110 249 13 3
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.4739336492890995 1 Fresno City 2.47 22 1 23 23 2 211.0 167 69 58 68 258 11.00 5 1.11 879 22 19
4.043681747269891 2 Reedley 4.04 11 13 24 24 4 213.2 210 117 96 99 202 8.51 8 1.45 970 22 34
4.137096774193549 3 Sequoias 4.14 9 12 23 23 5 206.2 200 107 95 84 151 6.58 5 1.37 904 24 33
5.188775510204082 4 Taft 5.19 12 10 22 22 6 196.0 223 136 113 89 143 6.57 19 1.59 924 20 36
5.359090909090909 5 Coalinga 5.36 11 12 25 25 4 220.0 306 218 131 102 157 6.42 13 1.85 1123 28 49
5.885191347753744 6 Merced 5.89 8 14 22 22 5 200.1 233 172 131 91 144 6.47 17 1.62 945 11 31
7.551562499999999 7 Porterville 7.55 8 17 25 25 4 213.1 280 219 179 148 184 7.76 11 2.01 1104 48 46
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.978448275862069 1 Sequoias 23 928 619 289 20 10 .978 21 28 12 .300 0
0.9637243047158404 2 Fresno City 23 827 633 164 30 6 .964 9 29 12 .293 0
0.9631635969664138 3 Reedley 24 923 641 248 34 14 .963 22 29 13 .310 0
0.9623329283110571 4 Taft 22 823 588 204 31 0 .962 14 38 7 .156 1
0.9584775086505191 5 Merced 22 867 601 230 36 20 .958 13 18 2 .100 0
0.9520089285714286 6 Porterville 25 896 640 213 43 28 .952 18 70 3 .041 0
0.932712215320911 7 Coalinga 25 966 660 241 65 17 .933 16 34 14 .292 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
96.0 1 Reedley 12 1,146 96
83.0 2 Taft 15 1,235 83
4.0 3 Merced 13 50 4
0.0 4 Coalinga 15 0 0
0 5 Fresno City 13 - -
0.0 6 Porterville 13 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 11 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3303964757709251 1 Fresno City 12 454 150 87 55 29 1 9 39 70 .330 .429 .458 28 6 2 5 52 59 .88 545
0.31976744186046513 2 Merced 9 344 110 62 37 15 1 8 24 70 .320 .408 .439 17 4 5 7 69 91 .76 407
0.28329297820823246 3 Coalinga 12 413 117 64 43 22 5 1 28 98 .283 .379 .368 24 6 4 9 102 84 1.21 490
0.289044289044289 4 Sequoias 12 429 124 61 52 21 4 1 26 84 .289 .380 .364 14 5 6 9 72 105 .69 506
0.25 5 Taft 9 316 79 42 24 13 3 5 21 78 .250 .316 .358 7 1 4 4 85 44 1.93 352
0.23384615384615384 6 Porterville 9 325 76 37 14 14 2 6 22 82 .234 .275 .345 5 2 2 1 62 78 .79 348
0.27639751552795033 7 Reedley 9 322 89 51 37 12 2 3 17 54 .276 .364 .354 11 6 9 11 96 82 1.17 385
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
100.0 1 Fresno City 12 100 208 24 10
74.0 2 Coalinga 12 74 152 37 9
72.0 3 Merced 9 72 151 16 0
44.0 4 Porterville 9 44 112 7 1
43.0 5 Taft 9 43 113 11 3
64.0 6 Sequoias 12 64 156 9 5
57.0 7 Reedley 9 57 114 4 1
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.4107142857142856 1 Fresno City 2.41 11 1 12 12 1 112.0 89 37 30 34 139 11.17 1 1.10 464 11 10
4.57258064516129 2 Reedley 4.57 4 5 9 9 2 82.2 81 52 42 37 74 8.06 1 1.43 384 16 17
3.147239263803681 3 Sequoias 3.15 5 5 12 12 2 108.2 92 44 38 29 63 5.22 1 1.11 439 10 15
5.661290322580645 4 Taft 5.66 3 6 9 9 1 82.2 101 59 52 37 64 6.97 9 1.67 393 13 16
4.839622641509434 5 Coalinga 4.84 4 6 12 12 0 106.0 164 101 57 35 69 5.86 9 1.88 532 6 15
4.607142857142857 6 Merced 4.61 6 3 9 9 4 84.0 94 63 43 29 61 6.54 6 1.46 383 4 13
9.37190082644628 7 Porterville 9.37 1 8 9 9 0 80.2 122 98 84 61 66 7.36 6 2.27 438 21 20
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9860834990059643 1 Sequoias 12 503 325 171 7 3 .986 15 9 6 .400 0
0.963963963963964 2 Fresno City 12 444 336 92 16 3 .964 5 13 6 .316 0
0.9518413597733711 3 Reedley 9 353 248 88 17 4 .952 9 9 2 .182 0
0.973293768545994 4 Taft 9 337 248 80 9 0 .973 5 16 5 .238 0
0.9514824797843666 5 Merced 9 371 252 101 18 2 .951 5 7 - - 0
0.940677966101695 6 Porterville 9 354 242 91 21 15 .941 8 42 3 .067 0
0.9400428265524625 7 Coalinga 12 467 318 121 28 3 .940 8 13 6 .316 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
96.0 1 Reedley 4 381 96
66.0 2 Taft 5 330 66
0.0 3 Merced 5 0 0
0.0 3 Coalinga 7 0 0
0 5 Fresno City 6 - -
0.0 6 Porterville 4 0 0
0.0 6 Sequoias 5 0 0