Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
7.853310980720871 1 San Diego Mesa 44 1532 470 261 170 274 .307 .392 .389
8.72348860257681 2 Palomar 38 1337 408 262 190 236 .305 .411 .414
6.460714285714285 3 San Diego City 33 1113 311 157 133 243 .279 .373 .390
7.349268292682926 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 1380 384 204 211 350 .278 .393 .388
7.413461538461538 5 Grossmont 36 1238 330 217 179 267 .267 .374 .380
6.985074626865671 6 Southwestern 38 1295 344 170 158 243 .266 .354 .347
5.921590909090909 7 Imperial Valley 38 1229 320 136 91 260 .260 .331 .344
4.989412897016362 8 Desert 40 1339 344 150 139 298 .257 .350 .316
7.0446985446985435 9 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1261 317 189 122 291 .251 .344 .354
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
7.349268292682926 1 San Bernardino Valley 39 82 12 15 109
7.853310980720871 2 San Diego Mesa 44 91 4 9 104
8.72348860257681 3 Palomar 38 73 11 17 101
7.0446985446985435 4 Mt. San Jacinto 37 73 7 14 94
7.413461538461538 5 Grossmont 36 64 7 21 92
6.460714285714285 6 San Diego City 33 56 11 15 82
5.921590909090909 7 Imperial Valley 38 61 12 6 79
6.985074626865671 8 Southwestern 38 56 10 10 76
4.989412897016362 9 Desert 40 56 4 5 65
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
8.72348860257681 1 Palomar 38 304 554 48 19
7.853310980720871 2 San Diego Mesa 44 299 596 52 16
7.413461538461538 3 Grossmont 36 246 471 34 15
7.349268292682926 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 246 535 55 28
7.0446985446985435 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 213 446 5 1
6.985074626865671 6 Southwestern 38 212 450 38 14
6.460714285714285 7 San Diego City 33 180 434 26 13
4.989412897016362 8 Desert 40 171 423 36 30
5.921590909090909 9 Imperial Valley 38 156 423 22 31
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
7.853310980720871 1 San Diego Mesa 44 56 19 61 28 415 402 1.03 1838
7.349268292682926 2 San Bernardino Valley 39 60 17 10 26 282 301 .94 1678
8.72348860257681 3 Palomar 38 65 22 40 28 355 319 1.11 1654
4.989412897016362 4 Desert 40 59 11 23 35 365 313 1.17 1571
6.985074626865671 5 Southwestern 38 30 19 22 19 324 378 .86 1524
7.413461538461538 6 Grossmont 36 42 16 13 29 257 333 .77 1488
7.0446985446985435 7 Mt. San Jacinto 37 65 18 14 32 274 367 .75 1480
5.921590909090909 8 Imperial Valley 38 43 7 10 15 345 270 1.28 1380
6.460714285714285 9 San Diego City 33 39 11 31 25 280 278 1.01 1327
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
5.921590909090909 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 293.1 384 365 317 9.73
6.460714285714285 2 San Diego City 33 33 280.0 323 285 218 7.01
4.989412897016362 3 Desert 40 40 346.1 476 353 254 6.60
7.349268292682926 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 341.2 381 247 182 4.79
7.0446985446985435 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 320.2 356 247 166 4.66
6.985074626865671 6 Southwestern 38 38 335.0 347 198 163 4.38
7.413461538461538 7 Grossmont 36 36 312.0 355 199 147 4.24
7.853310980720871 8 San Diego Mesa 44 44 397.2 427 216 168 3.80
8.72348860257681 9 Palomar 38 38 336.1 297 143 120 3.21
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
8.72348860257681 1 Palomar 38 38 326 8.72 6 -
7.853310980720871 2 San Diego Mesa 44 44 347 7.85 21 -
7.413461538461538 3 Grossmont 36 36 257 7.41 14 -
7.349268292682926 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 279 7.35 7 -
7.0446985446985435 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 251 7.04 9 -
6.985074626865671 6 Southwestern 38 38 260 6.99 6 -
6.460714285714285 7 San Diego City 33 33 201 6.46 17 -
5.921590909090909 8 Imperial Valley 38 38 193 5.92 16 -
4.989412897016362 9 Desert 40 40 192 4.99 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
8.72348860257681 1 Palomar 38 1480 1006 435 39 14 .974
7.853310980720871 2 San Diego Mesa 44 1718 1191 466 61 21 .964
6.985074626865671 3 Southwestern 38 1430 1001 373 56 15 .961
7.413461538461538 4 Grossmont 36 1323 917 349 57 26 .957
6.460714285714285 5 San Diego City 33 1243 840 345 58 10 .953
5.921590909090909 6 Imperial Valley 38 1314 903 349 62 50 .953
4.989412897016362 7 Desert 40 1476 1027 373 76 26 .949
7.0446985446985435 8 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1400 961 362 77 19 .945
7.349268292682926 9 San Bernardino Valley 39 1430 975 371 84 13 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
7.0446985446985435 1 Mt. San Jacinto 37 27 39 19 .328 -
8.72348860257681 2 Palomar 38 29 33 16 .327 -
7.853310980720871 3 San Diego Mesa 44 41 36 16 .308 -
6.460714285714285 4 San Diego City 33 25 33 14 .298 -
5.921590909090909 5 Imperial Valley 38 22 71 29 .290 1
6.985074626865671 6 Southwestern 38 26 46 17 .270 -
7.349268292682926 7 San Bernardino Valley 39 28 45 15 .250 1
7.413461538461538 8 Grossmont 36 17 61 18 .228 -
4.989412897016362 9 Desert 40 18 74 10 .119 2
Rk Team home games attend avg
6.985074626865671 1 Southwestern 19 3,550 187
8.72348860257681 2 Palomar 18 2,439 136
4.989412897016362 3 Desert 21 1,638 78
7.853310980720871 4 San Diego Mesa 23 1,787 78
6.460714285714285 5 San Diego City 17 1,010 59
7.0446985446985435 6 Mt. San Jacinto 19 881 46
7.349268292682926 7 San Bernardino Valley 18 285 16
5.921590909090909 8 Imperial Valley 16 200 13
7.413461538461538 9 Grossmont 14 35 3
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
8.393568147013783 1 San Diego Mesa 24 835 268 159 95 128 .321 .407 .401
8.621495327102805 2 Palomar 24 863 280 184 118 135 .324 .426 .440
6.608695652173913 3 San Diego City 24 816 226 130 101 179 .277 .373 .406
7.37914691943128 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 854 252 135 125 206 .295 .403 .412
7.14967105263158 5 Grossmont 23 812 242 164 120 165 .298 .401 .432
7.390357698289268 6 Southwestern 24 817 234 127 113 140 .286 .383 .384
5.5227272727272725 7 Imperial Valley 24 853 233 91 48 166 .273 .333 .348
5.003194888178914 8 Desert 24 807 212 97 88 183 .263 .354 .325
6.963394342762063 9 Mt. San Jacinto 23 785 200 128 75 166 .255 .350 .372
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
7.37914691943128 1 San Bernardino Valley 24 55 9 9 73
8.393568147013783 2 San Diego Mesa 24 47 4 4 55
8.621495327102805 3 Palomar 24 51 8 11 70
6.963394342762063 4 Mt. San Jacinto 23 51 4 11 66
7.14967105263158 5 Grossmont 23 48 5 17 70
6.608695652173913 6 San Diego City 24 42 9 15 66
5.5227272727272725 7 Imperial Valley 24 45 5 3 53
7.390357698289268 8 Southwestern 24 38 9 8 55
5.003194888178914 9 Desert 24 38 3 2 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
8.621495327102805 1 Palomar 24 216 380 32 14
8.393568147013783 2 San Diego Mesa 24 184 335 33 10
7.14967105263158 3 Grossmont 23 182 351 26 10
7.37914691943128 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 163 352 35 17
6.963394342762063 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 142 292 3 1
7.390357698289268 6 Southwestern 24 160 314 31 9
6.608695652173913 7 San Diego City 24 141 331 23 9
5.003194888178914 8 Desert 24 112 262 29 23
5.5227272727272725 9 Imperial Valley 24 104 297 17 21
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
8.393568147013783 1 San Diego Mesa 24 34 11 42 14 225 241 .93 1017
7.37914691943128 2 San Bernardino Valley 24 40 15 4 20 183 201 .91 1038
8.621495327102805 3 Palomar 24 48 18 27 17 203 229 .89 1074
5.003194888178914 4 Desert 24 30 7 15 18 208 189 1.10 947
7.390357698289268 5 Southwestern 24 24 14 18 14 202 243 .83 986
7.14967105263158 6 Grossmont 23 29 13 8 18 164 227 .72 982
6.963394342762063 7 Mt. San Jacinto 23 46 11 7 21 180 231 .78 924
5.5227272727272725 8 Imperial Valley 24 32 7 6 8 232 200 1.16 946
6.608695652173913 9 San Diego City 24 29 9 25 15 206 210 .98 980
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
5.5227272727272725 1 Imperial Valley 24 24 205.1 272 252 221 9.69
6.608695652173913 2 San Diego City 24 24 207.0 228 193 158 6.87
5.003194888178914 3 Desert 24 24 208.2 301 227 166 7.16
7.37914691943128 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 211.0 255 159 118 5.03
6.963394342762063 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 200.1 225 148 98 4.40
7.390357698289268 6 Southwestern 24 24 214.1 218 112 93 3.91
7.14967105263158 7 Grossmont 23 23 202.2 236 127 95 4.22
8.393568147013783 8 San Diego Mesa 24 24 217.2 228 105 84 3.47
8.621495327102805 9 Palomar 24 24 214.0 183 81 67 2.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
8.621495327102805 1 Palomar 24 24 205 8.62 3 -
8.393568147013783 2 San Diego Mesa 24 24 203 8.39 11 -
7.14967105263158 3 Grossmont 23 23 161 7.15 8 -
7.37914691943128 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 173 7.38 5 -
6.963394342762063 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 155 6.96 7 -
7.390357698289268 6 Southwestern 24 24 176 7.39 4 -
6.608695652173913 7 San Diego City 24 24 152 6.61 14 -
5.5227272727272725 8 Imperial Valley 24 24 126 5.52 12 -
5.003194888178914 9 Desert 24 24 116 5.00 16 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
8.621495327102805 1 Palomar 24 926 639 267 20 6 .978
8.393568147013783 2 San Diego Mesa 24 924 653 239 32 10 .965
7.390357698289268 3 Southwestern 24 903 639 234 30 8 .967
7.14967105263158 4 Grossmont 23 883 607 241 35 16 .960
6.608695652173913 5 San Diego City 24 902 621 245 36 7 .960
5.5227272727272725 6 Imperial Valley 24 891 616 234 41 29 .954
5.003194888178914 7 Desert 24 886 614 226 46 15 .948
6.963394342762063 8 Mt. San Jacinto 23 864 601 216 47 9 .946
7.37914691943128 9 San Bernardino Valley 24 910 633 221 56 6 .938
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
6.963394342762063 1 Mt. San Jacinto 23 14 22 14 .389 -
8.621495327102805 2 Palomar 24 12 12 9 .429 -
8.393568147013783 3 San Diego Mesa 24 22 17 9 .346 -
6.608695652173913 4 San Diego City 24 22 26 11 .297 -
5.5227272727272725 5 Imperial Valley 24 17 34 18 .346 1
7.390357698289268 6 Southwestern 24 17 26 7 .212 -
7.37914691943128 7 San Bernardino Valley 24 18 18 8 .308 1
7.14967105263158 8 Grossmont 23 13 33 15 .313 -
5.003194888178914 9 Desert 24 10 41 6 .128 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
7.390357698289268 1 Southwestern 12 1,950 163
8.621495327102805 2 Palomar 13 1,723 133
5.003194888178914 3 Desert 12 936 78
8.393568147013783 4 San Diego Mesa 13 987 76
6.608695652173913 5 San Diego City 12 685 57
6.963394342762063 6 Mt. San Jacinto 12 648 54
7.37914691943128 7 San Bernardino Valley 12 235 20
5.5227272727272725 8 Imperial Valley 11 130 12
7.14967105263158 9 Grossmont 10 35 4