Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1.0323383084577114 1 San Diego Mesa 44 1532 470 261 170 274 .307 .392 .389
1.1128526645768024 2 Palomar 38 1337 408 262 190 236 .305 .411 .414
1.0071942446043165 3 San Diego City 33 1113 311 157 133 243 .279 .373 .390
0.9368770764119602 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 1380 384 204 211 350 .278 .393 .388
0.7717717717717718 5 Grossmont 36 1238 330 217 179 267 .267 .374 .380
0.8571428571428571 6 Southwestern 38 1295 344 170 158 243 .266 .354 .347
1.2777777777777777 7 Imperial Valley 38 1229 320 136 91 260 .260 .331 .344
1.1661341853035143 8 Desert 40 1339 344 150 139 298 .257 .350 .316
0.7465940054495913 9 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1261 317 189 122 291 .251 .344 .354
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.9368770764119602 1 San Bernardino Valley 39 82 12 15 109
1.0323383084577114 2 San Diego Mesa 44 91 4 9 104
1.1128526645768024 3 Palomar 38 73 11 17 101
0.7465940054495913 4 Mt. San Jacinto 37 73 7 14 94
0.7717717717717718 5 Grossmont 36 64 7 21 92
1.0071942446043165 6 San Diego City 33 56 11 15 82
1.2777777777777777 7 Imperial Valley 38 61 12 6 79
0.8571428571428571 8 Southwestern 38 56 10 10 76
1.1661341853035143 9 Desert 40 56 4 5 65
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
1.1128526645768024 1 Palomar 38 304 554 48 19
1.0323383084577114 2 San Diego Mesa 44 299 596 52 16
0.7717717717717718 3 Grossmont 36 246 471 34 15
0.9368770764119602 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 246 535 55 28
0.7465940054495913 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 213 446 5 1
0.8571428571428571 6 Southwestern 38 212 450 38 14
1.0071942446043165 7 San Diego City 33 180 434 26 13
1.1661341853035143 8 Desert 40 171 423 36 30
1.2777777777777777 9 Imperial Valley 38 156 423 22 31
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1.2777777777777777 1 Imperial Valley 38 43 7 10 15 345 270 1.28 1380
1.1661341853035143 2 Desert 40 59 11 23 35 365 313 1.17 1571
1.1128526645768024 3 Palomar 38 65 22 40 28 355 319 1.11 1654
1.0323383084577114 4 San Diego Mesa 44 56 19 61 28 415 402 1.03 1838
1.0071942446043165 5 San Diego City 33 39 11 31 25 280 278 1.01 1327
0.9368770764119602 6 San Bernardino Valley 39 60 17 10 26 282 301 .94 1678
0.8571428571428571 7 Southwestern 38 30 19 22 19 324 378 .86 1524
0.7717717717717718 8 Grossmont 36 42 16 13 29 257 333 .77 1488
0.7465940054495913 9 Mt. San Jacinto 37 65 18 14 32 274 367 .75 1480
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.2777777777777777 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 293.1 384 365 317 9.73
1.0071942446043165 2 San Diego City 33 33 280.0 323 285 218 7.01
1.1661341853035143 3 Desert 40 40 346.1 476 353 254 6.60
0.9368770764119602 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 341.2 381 247 182 4.79
0.7465940054495913 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 320.2 356 247 166 4.66
0.8571428571428571 6 Southwestern 38 38 335.0 347 198 163 4.38
0.7717717717717718 7 Grossmont 36 36 312.0 355 199 147 4.24
1.0323383084577114 8 San Diego Mesa 44 44 397.2 427 216 168 3.80
1.1128526645768024 9 Palomar 38 38 336.1 297 143 120 3.21
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.7465940054495913 1 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 251 7.04 9 -
0.7717717717717718 2 Grossmont 36 36 257 7.41 14 -
0.8571428571428571 3 Southwestern 38 38 260 6.99 6 -
0.9368770764119602 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 279 7.35 7 -
1.0071942446043165 5 San Diego City 33 33 201 6.46 17 -
1.0323383084577114 6 San Diego Mesa 44 44 347 7.85 21 -
1.1128526645768024 7 Palomar 38 38 326 8.72 6 -
1.1661341853035143 8 Desert 40 40 192 4.99 20 -
1.2777777777777777 9 Imperial Valley 38 38 193 5.92 16 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1.1128526645768024 1 Palomar 38 1480 1006 435 39 14 .974
1.0323383084577114 2 San Diego Mesa 44 1718 1191 466 61 21 .964
0.8571428571428571 3 Southwestern 38 1430 1001 373 56 15 .961
0.7717717717717718 4 Grossmont 36 1323 917 349 57 26 .957
1.0071942446043165 5 San Diego City 33 1243 840 345 58 10 .953
1.2777777777777777 6 Imperial Valley 38 1314 903 349 62 50 .953
1.1661341853035143 7 Desert 40 1476 1027 373 76 26 .949
0.7465940054495913 8 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1400 961 362 77 19 .945
0.9368770764119602 9 San Bernardino Valley 39 1430 975 371 84 13 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.7465940054495913 1 Mt. San Jacinto 37 27 39 19 .328 -
1.1128526645768024 2 Palomar 38 29 33 16 .327 -
1.0323383084577114 3 San Diego Mesa 44 41 36 16 .308 -
1.0071942446043165 4 San Diego City 33 25 33 14 .298 -
1.2777777777777777 5 Imperial Valley 38 22 71 29 .290 1
0.8571428571428571 6 Southwestern 38 26 46 17 .270 -
0.9368770764119602 7 San Bernardino Valley 39 28 45 15 .250 1
0.7717717717717718 8 Grossmont 36 17 61 18 .228 -
1.1661341853035143 9 Desert 40 18 74 10 .119 2
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.8571428571428571 1 Southwestern 19 3,550 187
1.1128526645768024 2 Palomar 18 2,439 136
1.1661341853035143 3 Desert 21 1,638 78
1.0323383084577114 4 San Diego Mesa 23 1,787 78
1.0071942446043165 5 San Diego City 17 1,010 59
0.7465940054495913 6 Mt. San Jacinto 19 881 46
0.9368770764119602 7 San Bernardino Valley 18 285 16
1.2777777777777777 8 Imperial Valley 16 200 13
0.7717717717717718 9 Grossmont 14 35 3
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.9336099585062241 1 San Diego Mesa 24 835 268 159 95 128 .321 .407 .401
0.8864628820960698 2 Palomar 24 863 280 184 118 135 .324 .426 .440
0.9809523809523809 3 San Diego City 24 816 226 130 101 179 .277 .373 .406
0.9104477611940298 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 854 252 135 125 206 .295 .403 .412
0.7224669603524229 5 Grossmont 23 812 242 164 120 165 .298 .401 .432
0.831275720164609 6 Southwestern 24 817 234 127 113 140 .286 .383 .384
1.16 7 Imperial Valley 24 853 233 91 48 166 .273 .333 .348
1.1005291005291005 8 Desert 24 807 212 97 88 183 .263 .354 .325
0.7792207792207793 9 Mt. San Jacinto 23 785 200 128 75 166 .255 .350 .372
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.9104477611940298 1 San Bernardino Valley 24 55 9 9 73
0.9336099585062241 2 San Diego Mesa 24 47 4 4 55
0.8864628820960698 3 Palomar 24 51 8 11 70
0.7792207792207793 4 Mt. San Jacinto 23 51 4 11 66
0.7224669603524229 5 Grossmont 23 48 5 17 70
0.9809523809523809 6 San Diego City 24 42 9 15 66
1.16 7 Imperial Valley 24 45 5 3 53
0.831275720164609 8 Southwestern 24 38 9 8 55
1.1005291005291005 9 Desert 24 38 3 2 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.8864628820960698 1 Palomar 24 216 380 32 14
0.9336099585062241 2 San Diego Mesa 24 184 335 33 10
0.7224669603524229 3 Grossmont 23 182 351 26 10
0.9104477611940298 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 163 352 35 17
0.7792207792207793 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 142 292 3 1
0.831275720164609 6 Southwestern 24 160 314 31 9
0.9809523809523809 7 San Diego City 24 141 331 23 9
1.1005291005291005 8 Desert 24 112 262 29 23
1.16 9 Imperial Valley 24 104 297 17 21
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1.16 1 Imperial Valley 24 32 7 6 8 232 200 1.16 946
1.1005291005291005 2 Desert 24 30 7 15 18 208 189 1.10 947
0.8864628820960698 3 Palomar 24 48 18 27 17 203 229 .89 1074
0.9336099585062241 4 San Diego Mesa 24 34 11 42 14 225 241 .93 1017
0.9809523809523809 5 San Diego City 24 29 9 25 15 206 210 .98 980
0.9104477611940298 6 San Bernardino Valley 24 40 15 4 20 183 201 .91 1038
0.831275720164609 7 Southwestern 24 24 14 18 14 202 243 .83 986
0.7224669603524229 8 Grossmont 23 29 13 8 18 164 227 .72 982
0.7792207792207793 9 Mt. San Jacinto 23 46 11 7 21 180 231 .78 924
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.16 1 Imperial Valley 24 24 205.1 272 252 221 9.69
0.9809523809523809 2 San Diego City 24 24 207.0 228 193 158 6.87
1.1005291005291005 3 Desert 24 24 208.2 301 227 166 7.16
0.9104477611940298 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 211.0 255 159 118 5.03
0.7792207792207793 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 200.1 225 148 98 4.40
0.831275720164609 6 Southwestern 24 24 214.1 218 112 93 3.91
0.7224669603524229 7 Grossmont 23 23 202.2 236 127 95 4.22
0.9336099585062241 8 San Diego Mesa 24 24 217.2 228 105 84 3.47
0.8864628820960698 9 Palomar 24 24 214.0 183 81 67 2.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.7792207792207793 1 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 155 6.96 7 -
0.7224669603524229 2 Grossmont 23 23 161 7.15 8 -
0.831275720164609 3 Southwestern 24 24 176 7.39 4 -
0.9104477611940298 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 173 7.38 5 -
0.9809523809523809 5 San Diego City 24 24 152 6.61 14 -
0.9336099585062241 6 San Diego Mesa 24 24 203 8.39 11 -
0.8864628820960698 7 Palomar 24 24 205 8.62 3 -
1.1005291005291005 8 Desert 24 24 116 5.00 16 -
1.16 9 Imperial Valley 24 24 126 5.52 12 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.8864628820960698 1 Palomar 24 926 639 267 20 6 .978
0.9336099585062241 2 San Diego Mesa 24 924 653 239 32 10 .965
0.831275720164609 3 Southwestern 24 903 639 234 30 8 .967
0.7224669603524229 4 Grossmont 23 883 607 241 35 16 .960
0.9809523809523809 5 San Diego City 24 902 621 245 36 7 .960
1.16 6 Imperial Valley 24 891 616 234 41 29 .954
1.1005291005291005 7 Desert 24 886 614 226 46 15 .948
0.7792207792207793 8 Mt. San Jacinto 23 864 601 216 47 9 .946
0.9104477611940298 9 San Bernardino Valley 24 910 633 221 56 6 .938
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.7792207792207793 1 Mt. San Jacinto 23 14 22 14 .389 -
0.8864628820960698 2 Palomar 24 12 12 9 .429 -
0.9336099585062241 3 San Diego Mesa 24 22 17 9 .346 -
0.9809523809523809 4 San Diego City 24 22 26 11 .297 -
1.16 5 Imperial Valley 24 17 34 18 .346 1
0.831275720164609 6 Southwestern 24 17 26 7 .212 -
0.9104477611940298 7 San Bernardino Valley 24 18 18 8 .308 1
0.7224669603524229 8 Grossmont 23 13 33 15 .313 -
1.1005291005291005 9 Desert 24 10 41 6 .128 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.831275720164609 1 Southwestern 12 1,950 163
0.8864628820960698 2 Palomar 13 1,723 133
1.1005291005291005 3 Desert 12 936 78
0.9336099585062241 4 San Diego Mesa 13 987 76
0.9809523809523809 5 San Diego City 12 685 57
0.7792207792207793 6 Mt. San Jacinto 12 648 54
0.9104477611940298 7 San Bernardino Valley 12 235 20
1.16 8 Imperial Valley 11 130 12
0.7224669603524229 9 Grossmont 10 35 4