Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.9644935972060535 1 San Diego Mesa 44 1532 470 261 170 274 .307 .392 .389
0.9736486486486486 2 Palomar 38 1337 408 262 190 236 .305 .411 .414
0.9533386967015286 3 San Diego City 33 1113 311 157 133 243 .279 .373 .390
0.9412587412587412 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 1380 384 204 211 350 .278 .393 .388
0.9569160997732427 5 Grossmont 36 1238 330 217 179 267 .267 .374 .380
0.9608391608391609 6 Southwestern 38 1295 344 170 158 243 .266 .354 .347
0.9528158295281582 7 Imperial Valley 38 1229 320 136 91 260 .260 .331 .344
0.948509485094851 8 Desert 40 1339 344 150 139 298 .257 .350 .316
0.945 9 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1261 317 189 122 291 .251 .344 .354
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.9412587412587412 1 San Bernardino Valley 39 82 12 15 109
0.9644935972060535 2 San Diego Mesa 44 91 4 9 104
0.9736486486486486 3 Palomar 38 73 11 17 101
0.945 4 Mt. San Jacinto 37 73 7 14 94
0.9569160997732427 5 Grossmont 36 64 7 21 92
0.9533386967015286 6 San Diego City 33 56 11 15 82
0.9528158295281582 7 Imperial Valley 38 61 12 6 79
0.9608391608391609 8 Southwestern 38 56 10 10 76
0.948509485094851 9 Desert 40 56 4 5 65
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.9736486486486486 1 Palomar 38 304 554 48 19
0.9644935972060535 2 San Diego Mesa 44 299 596 52 16
0.9569160997732427 3 Grossmont 36 246 471 34 15
0.9412587412587412 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 246 535 55 28
0.945 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 213 446 5 1
0.9608391608391609 6 Southwestern 38 212 450 38 14
0.9533386967015286 7 San Diego City 33 180 434 26 13
0.948509485094851 8 Desert 40 171 423 36 30
0.9528158295281582 9 Imperial Valley 38 156 423 22 31
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.9644935972060535 1 San Diego Mesa 44 56 19 61 28 415 402 1.03 1838
0.9412587412587412 2 San Bernardino Valley 39 60 17 10 26 282 301 .94 1678
0.9736486486486486 3 Palomar 38 65 22 40 28 355 319 1.11 1654
0.948509485094851 4 Desert 40 59 11 23 35 365 313 1.17 1571
0.9608391608391609 5 Southwestern 38 30 19 22 19 324 378 .86 1524
0.9569160997732427 6 Grossmont 36 42 16 13 29 257 333 .77 1488
0.945 7 Mt. San Jacinto 37 65 18 14 32 274 367 .75 1480
0.9528158295281582 8 Imperial Valley 38 43 7 10 15 345 270 1.28 1380
0.9533386967015286 9 San Diego City 33 39 11 31 25 280 278 1.01 1327
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.9528158295281582 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 293.1 384 365 317 9.73
0.9533386967015286 2 San Diego City 33 33 280.0 323 285 218 7.01
0.948509485094851 3 Desert 40 40 346.1 476 353 254 6.60
0.9412587412587412 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 341.2 381 247 182 4.79
0.945 5 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 320.2 356 247 166 4.66
0.9608391608391609 6 Southwestern 38 38 335.0 347 198 163 4.38
0.9569160997732427 7 Grossmont 36 36 312.0 355 199 147 4.24
0.9644935972060535 8 San Diego Mesa 44 44 397.2 427 216 168 3.80
0.9736486486486486 9 Palomar 38 38 336.1 297 143 120 3.21
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.9736486486486486 1 Palomar 38 38 326 8.72 6 -
0.9608391608391609 2 Southwestern 38 38 260 6.99 6 -
0.9644935972060535 3 San Diego Mesa 44 44 347 7.85 21 -
0.9569160997732427 4 Grossmont 36 36 257 7.41 14 -
0.9533386967015286 5 San Diego City 33 33 201 6.46 17 -
0.9528158295281582 6 Imperial Valley 38 38 193 5.92 16 -
0.948509485094851 7 Desert 40 40 192 4.99 20 -
0.945 8 Mt. San Jacinto 37 37 251 7.04 9 -
0.9412587412587412 9 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 279 7.35 7 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9736486486486486 1 Palomar 38 1480 1006 435 39 14 .974
0.9644935972060535 2 San Diego Mesa 44 1718 1191 466 61 21 .964
0.9608391608391609 3 Southwestern 38 1430 1001 373 56 15 .961
0.9569160997732427 4 Grossmont 36 1323 917 349 57 26 .957
0.9533386967015286 5 San Diego City 33 1243 840 345 58 10 .953
0.9528158295281582 6 Imperial Valley 38 1314 903 349 62 50 .953
0.948509485094851 7 Desert 40 1476 1027 373 76 26 .949
0.945 8 Mt. San Jacinto 37 1400 961 362 77 19 .945
0.9412587412587412 9 San Bernardino Valley 39 1430 975 371 84 13 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.945 1 Mt. San Jacinto 37 27 39 19 .328 -
0.9736486486486486 2 Palomar 38 29 33 16 .327 -
0.9644935972060535 3 San Diego Mesa 44 41 36 16 .308 -
0.9533386967015286 4 San Diego City 33 25 33 14 .298 -
0.9528158295281582 5 Imperial Valley 38 22 71 29 .290 1
0.9608391608391609 6 Southwestern 38 26 46 17 .270 -
0.9412587412587412 7 San Bernardino Valley 39 28 45 15 .250 1
0.9569160997732427 8 Grossmont 36 17 61 18 .228 -
0.948509485094851 9 Desert 40 18 74 10 .119 2
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.9608391608391609 1 Southwestern 19 3,550 187
0.9736486486486486 2 Palomar 18 2,439 136
0.948509485094851 3 Desert 21 1,638 78
0.9644935972060535 4 San Diego Mesa 23 1,787 78
0.9533386967015286 5 San Diego City 17 1,010 59
0.945 6 Mt. San Jacinto 19 881 46
0.9412587412587412 7 San Bernardino Valley 18 285 16
0.9528158295281582 8 Imperial Valley 16 200 13
0.9569160997732427 9 Grossmont 14 35 3
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.9653679653679653 1 San Diego Mesa 24 835 268 159 95 128 .321 .407 .401
0.978401727861771 2 Palomar 24 863 280 184 118 135 .324 .426 .440
0.9600886917960089 3 San Diego City 24 816 226 130 101 179 .277 .373 .406
0.9384615384615385 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 854 252 135 125 206 .295 .403 .412
0.9603624009060022 5 Grossmont 23 812 242 164 120 165 .298 .401 .432
0.9667774086378738 6 Southwestern 24 817 234 127 113 140 .286 .383 .384
0.9539842873176206 7 Imperial Valley 24 853 233 91 48 166 .273 .333 .348
0.9480812641083521 8 Desert 24 807 212 97 88 183 .263 .354 .325
0.9456018518518519 9 Mt. San Jacinto 23 785 200 128 75 166 .255 .350 .372
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.9384615384615385 1 San Bernardino Valley 24 55 9 9 73
0.9653679653679653 2 San Diego Mesa 24 47 4 4 55
0.978401727861771 3 Palomar 24 51 8 11 70
0.9456018518518519 4 Mt. San Jacinto 23 51 4 11 66
0.9603624009060022 5 Grossmont 23 48 5 17 70
0.9600886917960089 6 San Diego City 24 42 9 15 66
0.9539842873176206 7 Imperial Valley 24 45 5 3 53
0.9667774086378738 8 Southwestern 24 38 9 8 55
0.9480812641083521 9 Desert 24 38 3 2 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.978401727861771 1 Palomar 24 216 380 32 14
0.9653679653679653 2 San Diego Mesa 24 184 335 33 10
0.9603624009060022 3 Grossmont 23 182 351 26 10
0.9384615384615385 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 163 352 35 17
0.9456018518518519 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 142 292 3 1
0.9667774086378738 6 Southwestern 24 160 314 31 9
0.9600886917960089 7 San Diego City 24 141 331 23 9
0.9480812641083521 8 Desert 24 112 262 29 23
0.9539842873176206 9 Imperial Valley 24 104 297 17 21
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.9653679653679653 1 San Diego Mesa 24 34 11 42 14 225 241 .93 1017
0.9384615384615385 2 San Bernardino Valley 24 40 15 4 20 183 201 .91 1038
0.978401727861771 3 Palomar 24 48 18 27 17 203 229 .89 1074
0.9480812641083521 4 Desert 24 30 7 15 18 208 189 1.10 947
0.9667774086378738 5 Southwestern 24 24 14 18 14 202 243 .83 986
0.9603624009060022 6 Grossmont 23 29 13 8 18 164 227 .72 982
0.9456018518518519 7 Mt. San Jacinto 23 46 11 7 21 180 231 .78 924
0.9539842873176206 8 Imperial Valley 24 32 7 6 8 232 200 1.16 946
0.9600886917960089 9 San Diego City 24 29 9 25 15 206 210 .98 980
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.9539842873176206 1 Imperial Valley 24 24 205.1 272 252 221 9.69
0.9600886917960089 2 San Diego City 24 24 207.0 228 193 158 6.87
0.9480812641083521 3 Desert 24 24 208.2 301 227 166 7.16
0.9384615384615385 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 211.0 255 159 118 5.03
0.9456018518518519 5 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 200.1 225 148 98 4.40
0.9667774086378738 6 Southwestern 24 24 214.1 218 112 93 3.91
0.9603624009060022 7 Grossmont 23 23 202.2 236 127 95 4.22
0.9653679653679653 8 San Diego Mesa 24 24 217.2 228 105 84 3.47
0.978401727861771 9 Palomar 24 24 214.0 183 81 67 2.82
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.978401727861771 1 Palomar 24 24 205 8.62 3 -
0.9667774086378738 2 Southwestern 24 24 176 7.39 4 -
0.9653679653679653 3 San Diego Mesa 24 24 203 8.39 11 -
0.9603624009060022 4 Grossmont 23 23 161 7.15 8 -
0.9600886917960089 5 San Diego City 24 24 152 6.61 14 -
0.9539842873176206 6 Imperial Valley 24 24 126 5.52 12 -
0.9480812641083521 7 Desert 24 24 116 5.00 16 -
0.9456018518518519 8 Mt. San Jacinto 23 23 155 6.96 7 -
0.9384615384615385 9 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 173 7.38 5 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.978401727861771 1 Palomar 24 926 639 267 20 6 .978
0.9653679653679653 2 San Diego Mesa 24 924 653 239 32 10 .965
0.9667774086378738 3 Southwestern 24 903 639 234 30 8 .967
0.9603624009060022 4 Grossmont 23 883 607 241 35 16 .960
0.9600886917960089 5 San Diego City 24 902 621 245 36 7 .960
0.9539842873176206 6 Imperial Valley 24 891 616 234 41 29 .954
0.9480812641083521 7 Desert 24 886 614 226 46 15 .948
0.9456018518518519 8 Mt. San Jacinto 23 864 601 216 47 9 .946
0.9384615384615385 9 San Bernardino Valley 24 910 633 221 56 6 .938
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9456018518518519 1 Mt. San Jacinto 23 14 22 14 .389 -
0.978401727861771 2 Palomar 24 12 12 9 .429 -
0.9653679653679653 3 San Diego Mesa 24 22 17 9 .346 -
0.9600886917960089 4 San Diego City 24 22 26 11 .297 -
0.9539842873176206 5 Imperial Valley 24 17 34 18 .346 1
0.9667774086378738 6 Southwestern 24 17 26 7 .212 -
0.9384615384615385 7 San Bernardino Valley 24 18 18 8 .308 1
0.9603624009060022 8 Grossmont 23 13 33 15 .313 -
0.9480812641083521 9 Desert 24 10 41 6 .128 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.9667774086378738 1 Southwestern 12 1,950 163
0.978401727861771 2 Palomar 13 1,723 133
0.9480812641083521 3 Desert 12 936 78
0.9653679653679653 4 San Diego Mesa 13 987 76
0.9600886917960089 5 San Diego City 12 685 57
0.9456018518518519 6 Mt. San Jacinto 12 648 54
0.9384615384615385 7 San Bernardino Valley 12 235 20
0.9539842873176206 8 Imperial Valley 11 130 12
0.9603624009060022 9 Grossmont 10 35 4