California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
1532.0 1	San Diego Mesa	44	1532	470	261	170	274	.307	.392	.389
1380.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	39	1380	384	204	211	350	.278	.393	.388
1339.0 3	Desert	40	1339	344	150	139	298	.257	.350	.316
1337.0 4	Palomar	38	1337	408	262	190	236	.305	.411	.414
1295.0 5	Southwestern	38	1295	344	170	158	243	.266	.354	.347
1261.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	37	1261	317	189	122	291	.251	.344	.354
1238.0 7	Grossmont	36	1238	330	217	179	267	.267	.374	.380
1229.0 8	Imperial Valley	38	1229	320	136	91	260	.260	.331	.344
1113.0 9	San Diego City	33	1113	311	157	133	243	.279	.373	.390

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
1380.0 1	San Bernardino Valley	39	82	12	15	109
1532.0 2	San Diego Mesa	44	91	4	9	104
1337.0 3	Palomar	38	73	11	17	101
1261.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	37	73	7	14	94
1238.0 5	Grossmont	36	64	7	21	92
1113.0 6	San Diego City	33	56	11	15	82
1229.0 7	Imperial Valley	38	61	12	6	79
1295.0 8	Southwestern	38	56	10	10	76
1339.0 9	Desert	40	56	4	5	65

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
1337.0 1	Palomar	38	304	554	48	19
1532.0 2	San Diego Mesa	44	299	596	52	16
1380.0 3	San Bernardino Valley	39	246	535	55	28
1238.0 4	Grossmont	36	246	471	34	15
1261.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	37	213	446	5	1
1295.0 6	Southwestern	38	212	450	38	14
1113.0 7	San Diego City	33	180	434	26	13
1339.0 8	Desert	40	171	423	36	30
1229.0 9	Imperial Valley	38	156	423	22	31

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1532.0 1	San Diego Mesa	44	56	19	61	28	415	402	1.03	1838
1380.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	39	60	17	10	26	282	301	.94	1678
1337.0 3	Palomar	38	65	22	40	28	355	319	1.11	1654
1339.0 4	Desert	40	59	11	23	35	365	313	1.17	1571
1295.0 5	Southwestern	38	30	19	22	19	324	378	.86	1524
1238.0 6	Grossmont	36	42	16	13	29	257	333	.77	1488
1261.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	37	65	18	14	32	274	367	.75	1480
1229.0 8	Imperial Valley	38	43	7	10	15	345	270	1.28	1380
1113.0 9	San Diego City	33	39	11	31	25	280	278	1.01	1327

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
1229.0 1	Imperial Valley	38	38	293.1	384	365	317	9.73
1113.0 2	San Diego City	33	33	280.0	323	285	218	7.01
1339.0 3	Desert	40	40	346.1	476	353	254	6.60
1380.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	39	39	341.2	381	247	182	4.79
1261.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	37	37	320.2	356	247	166	4.66
1295.0 6	Southwestern	38	38	335.0	347	198	163	4.38
1238.0 7	Grossmont	36	36	312.0	355	199	147	4.24
1532.0 8	San Diego Mesa	44	44	397.2	427	216	168	3.80
1337.0 9	Palomar	38	38	336.1	297	143	120	3.21

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
1532.0 1	San Diego Mesa	44	44	347	7.85	21	-
1380.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	39	39	279	7.35	7	-
1339.0 3	Desert	40	40	192	4.99	20	-
1337.0 4	Palomar	38	38	326	8.72	6	-
1295.0 5	Southwestern	38	38	260	6.99	6	-
1261.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	37	37	251	7.04	9	-
1238.0 7	Grossmont	36	36	257	7.41	14	-
1229.0 8	Imperial Valley	38	38	193	5.92	16	-
1113.0 9	San Diego City	33	33	201	6.46	17	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
1337.0 1	Palomar	38	1480	1006	435	39	14	.974
1532.0 2	San Diego Mesa	44	1718	1191	466	61	21	.964
1295.0 3	Southwestern	38	1430	1001	373	56	15	.961
1238.0 4	Grossmont	36	1323	917	349	57	26	.957
1113.0 5	San Diego City	33	1243	840	345	58	10	.953
1229.0 6	Imperial Valley	38	1314	903	349	62	50	.953
1339.0 7	Desert	40	1476	1027	373	76	26	.949
1261.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	37	1400	961	362	77	19	.945
1380.0 9	San Bernardino Valley	39	1430	975	371	84	13	.941

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
1261.0 1	Mt. San Jacinto	37	27	39	19	.328	-
1337.0 2	Palomar	38	29	33	16	.327	-
1532.0 3	San Diego Mesa	44	41	36	16	.308	-
1113.0 4	San Diego City	33	25	33	14	.298	-
1229.0 5	Imperial Valley	38	22	71	29	.290	1
1295.0 6	Southwestern	38	26	46	17	.270	-
1380.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	39	28	45	15	.250	1
1238.0 8	Grossmont	36	17	61	18	.228	-
1339.0 9	Desert	40	18	74	10	.119	2

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
1295.0 1	Southwestern	19	3,550	187
1337.0 2	Palomar	18	2,439	136
1339.0 3	Desert	21	1,638	78
1532.0 4	San Diego Mesa	23	1,787	78
1113.0 5	San Diego City	17	1,010	59
1261.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	19	881	46
1380.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	18	285	16
1229.0 8	Imperial Valley	16	200	13
1238.0 9	Grossmont	14	35	3

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
835.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	835	268	159	95	128	.321	.407	.401
854.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	24	854	252	135	125	206	.295	.403	.412
807.0 3	Desert	24	807	212	97	88	183	.263	.354	.325
863.0 4	Palomar	24	863	280	184	118	135	.324	.426	.440
817.0 5	Southwestern	24	817	234	127	113	140	.286	.383	.384
785.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	23	785	200	128	75	166	.255	.350	.372
812.0 7	Grossmont	23	812	242	164	120	165	.298	.401	.432
853.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	853	233	91	48	166	.273	.333	.348
816.0 9	San Diego City	24	816	226	130	101	179	.277	.373	.406

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
854.0 1	San Bernardino Valley	24	55	9	9	73
835.0 2	San Diego Mesa	24	47	4	4	55
863.0 3	Palomar	24	51	8	11	70
785.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	23	51	4	11	66
812.0 5	Grossmont	23	48	5	17	70
816.0 6	San Diego City	24	42	9	15	66
853.0 7	Imperial Valley	24	45	5	3	53
817.0 8	Southwestern	24	38	9	8	55
807.0 9	Desert	24	38	3	2	43

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
863.0 1	Palomar	24	216	380	32	14
835.0 2	San Diego Mesa	24	184	335	33	10
854.0 3	San Bernardino Valley	24	163	352	35	17
812.0 4	Grossmont	23	182	351	26	10
785.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	23	142	292	3	1
817.0 6	Southwestern	24	160	314	31	9
816.0 7	San Diego City	24	141	331	23	9
807.0 8	Desert	24	112	262	29	23
853.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	104	297	17	21

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
835.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	34	11	42	14	225	241	.93	1017
854.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	24	40	15	4	20	183	201	.91	1038
863.0 3	Palomar	24	48	18	27	17	203	229	.89	1074
807.0 4	Desert	24	30	7	15	18	208	189	1.10	947
817.0 5	Southwestern	24	24	14	18	14	202	243	.83	986
812.0 6	Grossmont	23	29	13	8	18	164	227	.72	982
785.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	23	46	11	7	21	180	231	.78	924
853.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	32	7	6	8	232	200	1.16	946
816.0 9	San Diego City	24	29	9	25	15	206	210	.98	980

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
853.0 1	Imperial Valley	24	24	205.1	272	252	221	9.69
816.0 2	San Diego City	24	24	207.0	228	193	158	6.87
807.0 3	Desert	24	24	208.2	301	227	166	7.16
854.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	24	24	211.0	255	159	118	5.03
785.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	23	23	200.1	225	148	98	4.40
817.0 6	Southwestern	24	24	214.1	218	112	93	3.91
812.0 7	Grossmont	23	23	202.2	236	127	95	4.22
835.0 8	San Diego Mesa	24	24	217.2	228	105	84	3.47
863.0 9	Palomar	24	24	214.0	183	81	67	2.82

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
835.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	24	203	8.39	11	-
854.0 2	San Bernardino Valley	24	24	173	7.38	5	-
807.0 3	Desert	24	24	116	5.00	16	-
863.0 4	Palomar	24	24	205	8.62	3	-
817.0 5	Southwestern	24	24	176	7.39	4	-
785.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	23	23	155	6.96	7	-
812.0 7	Grossmont	23	23	161	7.15	8	-
853.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	24	126	5.52	12	-
816.0 9	San Diego City	24	24	152	6.61	14	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
863.0 1	Palomar	24	926	639	267	20	6	.978
835.0 2	San Diego Mesa	24	924	653	239	32	10	.965
817.0 3	Southwestern	24	903	639	234	30	8	.967
812.0 4	Grossmont	23	883	607	241	35	16	.960
816.0 5	San Diego City	24	902	621	245	36	7	.960
853.0 6	Imperial Valley	24	891	616	234	41	29	.954
807.0 7	Desert	24	886	614	226	46	15	.948
785.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	23	864	601	216	47	9	.946
854.0 9	San Bernardino Valley	24	910	633	221	56	6	.938

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
785.0 1	Mt. San Jacinto	23	14	22	14	.389	-
863.0 2	Palomar	24	12	12	9	.429	-
835.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	22	17	9	.346	-
816.0 4	San Diego City	24	22	26	11	.297	-
853.0 5	Imperial Valley	24	17	34	18	.346	1
817.0 6	Southwestern	24	17	26	7	.212	-
854.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	24	18	18	8	.308	1
812.0 8	Grossmont	23	13	33	15	.313	-
807.0 9	Desert	24	10	41	6	.128	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
817.0 1	Southwestern	12	1,950	163
863.0 2	Palomar	13	1,723	133
807.0 3	Desert	12	936	78
835.0 4	San Diego Mesa	13	987	76
816.0 5	San Diego City	12	685	57
785.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	12	648	54
854.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	12	235	20
853.0 8	Imperial Valley	11	130	12
812.0 9	Grossmont	10	35	4