California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
1.7675438596491229 1	Fresno City	33	114	1528	13.40	586	3725	.253	1415	12.41	2025.5	17.8
1.5733333333333333 2	Merced	22	75	792	10.56	413	2194	.173	697	9.29	1084.0	14.5
1.4034090909090908 3	Cerro Coso	24	88	904	10.27	424	2918	.164	842	9.57	1233.5	14.0
1.4431818181818181 4	Columbia	24	88	1004	11.41	389	2068	.297	992	11.27	1208.0	13.7
1.6019417475728155 5	Sequoias	30	103	997	9.68	402	3113	.191	917	8.90	1394.0	13.5
1.079268292682927 6	Coalinga	23	82	790	9.63	387	2526	.160	785	9.57	1065.5	13.0
1.4013157894736843 7	Reedley	23	76	700	9.21	486	2381	.090	638	8.39	960.5	12.6
1.3894230769230769 8	Taft	28	104	865	8.32	384	3487	.138	820	7.88	1179.5	11.3
0.8544303797468354 9	Porterville	23	79	510	6.46	310	1295	.154	438	5.54	703.5	8.9
0.3582089552238806 10	Lemoore	21	67	260	3.88	241	1398	.014	228	3.40	397.0	5.9

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1.7675438596491229 1	Fresno City	33	114	2043	17.92	80	243	202	1.77
1.6019417475728155 2	Sequoias	30	103	1427	13.85	138	54	165	1.60
1.5733333333333333 3	Merced	22	75	977	13.03	70	96	118	1.57
1.4431818181818181 4	Columbia	24	88	943	10.72	124	6	127	1.44
1.4034090909090908 5	Cerro Coso	24	88	1455	16.53	44	159	124	1.40
1.4013157894736843 6	Reedley	23	76	1082	14.24	70	73	107	1.40
1.3894230769230769 7	Taft	28	104	1650	15.87	88	113	145	1.39
1.079268292682927 8	Coalinga	23	82	1286	15.68	41	95	89	1.08
0.8544303797468354 9	Porterville	23	79	547	6.92	51	33	68	0.85
0.3582089552238806 10	Lemoore	21	67	1186	17.70	17	14	24	0.36

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
1.7675438596491229 1	Fresno City	33	114	296	2.60	1642	143
1.4034090909090908 2	Cerro Coso	24	88	206	2.34	1499	187
1.5733333333333333 3	Merced	22	75	174	2.32	0	0
1.079268292682927 4	Coalinga	23	82	187	2.28	0	44
1.6019417475728155 5	Sequoias	30	103	232	2.25	1698	182
1.4013157894736843 6	Reedley	23	76	154	2.03	36	182
0.3582089552238806 7	Lemoore	21	67	113	1.69	0	0
1.3894230769230769 8	Taft	28	104	170	1.63	1675	76
0.8544303797468354 9	Porterville	23	79	126	1.59	0	0
1.4431818181818181 10	Columbia	24	88	77	0.88	0	14

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
1.5 1	Fresno City	18	57	770	13.51	263	1724	.294	721	12.65	1043.5	18.3
1.680327868852459 2	Merced	18	61	684	11.21	349	1883	.178	601	9.85	933.5	15.3
1.3676470588235294 3	Cerro Coso	18	68	701	10.31	317	2265	.170	658	9.68	947.0	13.9
1.3484848484848484 4	Columbia	18	66	804	12.18	327	1589	.300	795	12.05	948.0	14.4
1.7661290322580645 5	Sequoias	18	62	621	10.02	234	1885	.205	574	9.26	867.5	14.0
0.9765625 6	Coalinga	18	64	626	9.78	292	1999	.167	622	9.72	831.5	13.0
1.2666666666666666 7	Reedley	18	60	546	9.10	382	1888	.087	500	8.33	733.0	12.2
1.5724637681159421 8	Taft	18	69	597	8.65	261	2240	.150	577	8.36	828.5	12.0
0.8220338983050848 9	Porterville	18	59	377	6.39	237	980	.143	327	5.54	514.5	8.7
0.3793103448275862 10	Lemoore	18	58	230	3.97	219	1274	.009	202	3.48	335.0	5.8

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1.5 1	Fresno City	18	57	1071	18.79	30	111	86	1.50
1.7661290322580645 2	Sequoias	18	62	906	14.61	91	37	110	1.77
1.680327868852459 3	Merced	18	61	860	14.10	59	87	103	1.68
1.3484848484848484 4	Columbia	18	66	681	10.32	89	0	89	1.35
1.3676470588235294 5	Cerro Coso	18	68	1125	16.54	28	130	93	1.37
1.2666666666666666 6	Reedley	18	60	829	13.82	44	64	76	1.27
1.5724637681159421 7	Taft	18	69	1180	17.10	64	89	109	1.57
0.9765625 8	Coalinga	18	64	1031	16.11	31	63	63	0.98
0.8220338983050848 9	Porterville	18	59	426	7.22	34	29	49	0.82
0.3793103448275862 10	Lemoore	18	58	1082	18.66	15	14	22	0.38

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
1.5 1	Fresno City	18	57	188	3.30	717	50
1.3676470588235294 2	Cerro Coso	18	68	153	2.25	1171	145
1.680327868852459 3	Merced	18	61	147	2.41	0	0
0.9765625 4	Coalinga	18	64	143	2.23	0	27
1.7661290322580645 5	Sequoias	18	62	137	2.21	958	86
1.2666666666666666 6	Reedley	18	60	111	1.85	0	115
0.3793103448275862 7	Lemoore	18	58	83	1.43	0	0
1.5724637681159421 8	Taft	18	69	123	1.78	1072	45
0.8220338983050848 9	Porterville	18	59	89	1.51	0	0
1.3484848484848484 10	Columbia	18	66	55	0.83	0	2