Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
11.844660194174757 1 Grossmont 30 103 1326 12.87 422 2944 .307 1225 11.89 1932.0 18.8
13.291139240506329 2 MiraCosta 23 79 994 12.58 378 2430 .253 921 11.66 1278.5 16.2
15.182795698924732 3 San Diego Mesa 25 93 1030 11.08 443 2562 .229 1003 10.78 1404.5 15.1
6.764705882352941 4 Palomar 23 85 907 10.67 356 2439 .226 769 9.05 1204.0 14.2
21.435897435897434 5 San Diego City 22 78 856 10.97 359 2536 .196 809 10.37 1097.5 14.1
17.49473684210526 6 Mt. San Jacinto 25 95 918 9.66 503 3127 .133 739 7.78 1214.5 12.8
15.349397590361447 7 Southwestern 22 83 722 8.70 402 2488 .129 677 8.16 966.5 11.6
14.941176470588236 8 Imperial Valley 25 85 643 7.56 315 2175 .151 671 7.89 808.0 9.5
9.376811594202898 9 Cuyamaca 22 69 313 4.54 284 1244 .023 258 3.74 416.0 6.0
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
21.435897435897434 1 San Diego City 22 78 1672 21.44 70 65 103 1.31
17.49473684210526 2 Mt. San Jacinto 25 95 1662 17.49 48 119 108 1.13
15.349397590361447 3 Southwestern 22 83 1274 15.35 41 101 92 1.10
15.182795698924732 4 San Diego Mesa 25 93 1412 15.18 73 207 177 1.90
14.941176470588236 5 Imperial Valley 25 85 1270 14.94 90 4 92 1.08
13.291139240506329 6 MiraCosta 23 79 1050 13.29 23 143 95 1.20
11.844660194174757 7 Grossmont 30 103 1220 11.84 155 200 255 2.48
9.376811594202898 8 Cuyamaca 22 69 647 9.38 35 18 44 0.64
6.764705882352941 9 Palomar 23 85 575 6.76 91 136 159 1.87
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
11.844660194174757 1 Grossmont 30 103 351 3.41 - 0
13.291139240506329 2 MiraCosta 23 79 190 2.41 - 87
15.182795698924732 3 San Diego Mesa 25 93 198 2.13 - 12
17.49473684210526 4 Mt. San Jacinto 25 95 189 1.99 - 19
15.349397590361447 5 Southwestern 22 83 153 1.84 - 507
21.435897435897434 6 San Diego City 22 78 139 1.78 - 0
6.764705882352941 7 Palomar 23 85 138 1.62 - 0
14.941176470588236 8 Imperial Valley 25 85 73 0.86 - 148
9.376811594202898 9 Cuyamaca 22 69 59 0.86 - 0
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
12.745098039215685 1 Grossmont 16 51 682 13.37 193 1441 .339 627 12.29 1011.5 19.8
13.074074074074074 2 MiraCosta 16 54 702 13.00 257 1640 .271 656 12.15 888.5 16.5
15.847457627118644 3 San Diego Mesa 16 59 677 11.47 286 1684 .232 666 11.29 941.5 16.0
6.964285714285714 4 Palomar 16 56 599 10.70 234 1594 .229 511 9.13 800.0 14.3
22.280701754385966 5 San Diego City 16 57 619 10.86 260 1871 .192 579 10.16 807.0 14.2
17.56896551724138 6 Mt. San Jacinto 16 58 545 9.40 262 1869 .151 455 7.84 720.5 12.4
15.435483870967742 7 Southwestern 16 62 542 8.74 279 1813 .145 511 8.24 706.5 11.4
13.090909090909092 8 Imperial Valley 16 55 408 7.42 210 1396 .142 391 7.11 516.0 9.4
9.78 9 Cuyamaca 16 50 225 4.50 215 891 .011 182 3.64 307.0 6.1
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
22.280701754385966 1 San Diego City 16 57 1270 22.28 55 44 77 1.35
17.56896551724138 2 Mt. San Jacinto 16 58 1019 17.57 33 61 64 1.09
15.435483870967742 3 Southwestern 16 62 957 15.44 26 63 58 0.93
15.847457627118644 4 San Diego Mesa 16 59 935 15.85 50 141 121 2.04
13.090909090909092 5 Imperial Valley 16 55 720 13.09 67 0 67 1.22
13.074074074074074 6 MiraCosta 16 54 706 13.07 14 85 57 1.05
12.745098039215685 7 Grossmont 16 51 650 12.75 96 87 140 2.74
9.78 8 Cuyamaca 16 50 489 9.78 27 10 32 0.64
6.964285714285714 9 Palomar 16 56 390 6.96 66 76 104 1.86
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
12.745098039215685 1 Grossmont 16 51 190 3.73 - 0
13.074074074074074 2 MiraCosta 16 54 130 2.41 - 68
15.847457627118644 3 San Diego Mesa 16 59 144 2.44 - 0
17.56896551724138 4 Mt. San Jacinto 16 58 112 1.93 - 0
15.435483870967742 5 Southwestern 16 62 107 1.73 - 350
22.280701754385966 6 San Diego City 16 57 111 1.95 - 0
6.964285714285714 7 Palomar 16 56 97 1.73 - 0
13.090909090909092 8 Imperial Valley 16 55 41 0.75 - 108
9.78 9 Cuyamaca 16 50 50 1.00 - 0