California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
11.893203883495145 1	Grossmont	30	103	1326	12.87	422	2944	.307	1225	11.89	1932.0	18.8
11.658227848101266 2	MiraCosta	23	79	994	12.58	378	2430	.253	921	11.66	1278.5	16.2
10.78494623655914 3	San Diego Mesa	25	93	1030	11.08	443	2562	.229	1003	10.78	1404.5	15.1
10.371794871794872 4	San Diego City	22	78	856	10.97	359	2536	.196	809	10.37	1097.5	14.1
9.047058823529412 5	Palomar	23	85	907	10.67	356	2439	.226	769	9.05	1204.0	14.2
8.156626506024097 6	Southwestern	22	83	722	8.70	402	2488	.129	677	8.16	966.5	11.6
7.894117647058824 7	Imperial Valley	25	85	643	7.56	315	2175	.151	671	7.89	808.0	9.5
7.778947368421052 8	Mt. San Jacinto	25	95	918	9.66	503	3127	.133	739	7.78	1214.5	12.8
3.739130434782609 9	Cuyamaca	22	69	313	4.54	284	1244	.023	258	3.74	416.0	6.0

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
10.371794871794872 1	San Diego City	22	78	1672	21.44	70	65	103	1.31
7.778947368421052 2	Mt. San Jacinto	25	95	1662	17.49	48	119	108	1.13
10.78494623655914 3	San Diego Mesa	25	93	1412	15.18	73	207	177	1.90
8.156626506024097 4	Southwestern	22	83	1274	15.35	41	101	92	1.10
7.894117647058824 5	Imperial Valley	25	85	1270	14.94	90	4	92	1.08
11.893203883495145 6	Grossmont	30	103	1220	11.84	155	200	255	2.48
11.658227848101266 7	MiraCosta	23	79	1050	13.29	23	143	95	1.20
3.739130434782609 8	Cuyamaca	22	69	647	9.38	35	18	44	0.64
9.047058823529412 9	Palomar	23	85	575	6.76	91	136	159	1.87

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
11.893203883495145 1	Grossmont	30	103	351	3.41	-	0
11.658227848101266 2	MiraCosta	23	79	190	2.41	-	87
10.78494623655914 3	San Diego Mesa	25	93	198	2.13	-	12
7.778947368421052 4	Mt. San Jacinto	25	95	189	1.99	-	19
8.156626506024097 5	Southwestern	22	83	153	1.84	-	507
10.371794871794872 6	San Diego City	22	78	139	1.78	-	0
9.047058823529412 7	Palomar	23	85	138	1.62	-	0
7.894117647058824 8	Imperial Valley	25	85	73	0.86	-	148
3.739130434782609 9	Cuyamaca	22	69	59	0.86	-	0

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
12.294117647058824 1	Grossmont	16	51	682	13.37	193	1441	.339	627	12.29	1011.5	19.8
12.148148148148149 2	MiraCosta	16	54	702	13.00	257	1640	.271	656	12.15	888.5	16.5
11.288135593220339 3	San Diego Mesa	16	59	677	11.47	286	1684	.232	666	11.29	941.5	16.0
10.157894736842104 4	San Diego City	16	57	619	10.86	260	1871	.192	579	10.16	807.0	14.2
9.125 5	Palomar	16	56	599	10.70	234	1594	.229	511	9.13	800.0	14.3
8.241935483870968 6	Southwestern	16	62	542	8.74	279	1813	.145	511	8.24	706.5	11.4
7.109090909090909 7	Imperial Valley	16	55	408	7.42	210	1396	.142	391	7.11	516.0	9.4
7.844827586206897 8	Mt. San Jacinto	16	58	545	9.40	262	1869	.151	455	7.84	720.5	12.4
3.64 9	Cuyamaca	16	50	225	4.50	215	891	.011	182	3.64	307.0	6.1

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
10.157894736842104 1	San Diego City	16	57	1270	22.28	55	44	77	1.35
7.844827586206897 2	Mt. San Jacinto	16	58	1019	17.57	33	61	64	1.09
11.288135593220339 3	San Diego Mesa	16	59	935	15.85	50	141	121	2.04
8.241935483870968 4	Southwestern	16	62	957	15.44	26	63	58	0.93
7.109090909090909 5	Imperial Valley	16	55	720	13.09	67	0	67	1.22
12.294117647058824 6	Grossmont	16	51	650	12.75	96	87	140	2.74
12.148148148148149 7	MiraCosta	16	54	706	13.07	14	85	57	1.05
3.64 8	Cuyamaca	16	50	489	9.78	27	10	32	0.64
9.125 9	Palomar	16	56	390	6.96	66	76	104	1.86

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
12.294117647058824 1	Grossmont	16	51	190	3.73	-	0
12.148148148148149 2	MiraCosta	16	54	130	2.41	-	68
11.288135593220339 3	San Diego Mesa	16	59	144	2.44	-	0
7.844827586206897 4	Mt. San Jacinto	16	58	112	1.93	-	0
8.241935483870968 5	Southwestern	16	62	107	1.73	-	350
10.157894736842104 6	San Diego City	16	57	111	1.95	-	0
9.125 7	Palomar	16	56	97	1.73	-	0
7.109090909090909 8	Imperial Valley	16	55	41	0.75	-	108
3.64 9	Cuyamaca	16	50	50	1.00	-	0