California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Taft	21	419-1265	33.1	56-249	22.5	168-302	55.6	50.6
50.6 2	Lemoore	27	589-1437	41.0	72-339	21.2	267-486	54.9	56.2
56.2 3	Porterville	26	564-1586	35.6	157-568	27.6	247-401	61.6	58.9
58.9 4	Merced	31	703-1912	36.8	131-488	26.8	370-607	61.0	61.5
61.5 5	Reedley	26	618-1619	38.2	130-484	26.9	352-565	62.3	66.0
66.0 6	Sequoias	31	911-2269	40.1	210-711	29.5	302-558	54.1	75.3
75.3 7	Fresno City	32	920-2092	44.0	212-661	32.1	452-756	59.8	80.3

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Porterville	26	9.9	24.2	34.2	-11.0
-11.0 2	Taft	21	11.4	23.3	34.7	-13.9
-13.9 3	Reedley	26	11.5	26.5	38.0	-4.2
-4.2 4	Lemoore	27	12.1	24.6	36.7	1.1
1.1 5	Fresno City	32	14.8	26.9	41.7	6.8
6.8 6	Merced	31	15.3	23.2	38.5	2.0
2.0 7	Sequoias	31	20.0	25.2	45.2	12.2

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Fresno City	32	16.8	7.0	3.1	17.8
17.8 2	Sequoias	31	18.4	7.3	2.8	12.8
12.8 3	Lemoore	27	18.6	13.6	2.8	11.1
11.1 4	Merced	31	19.2	11.2	2.4	10.4
10.4 5	Reedley	26	20.8	12.7	2.8	8.6
8.6 6	Porterville	26	21.8	11.7	3.0	10.2
10.2 7	Taft	21	26.2	16.6	3.0	7.1

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Taft	21	12.1	0.615	-0.441
-0.441 2	Porterville	26	15.0	0.731	-0.224
-0.224 3	Reedley	26	17.6	0.800	-0.072
-0.072 4	Merced	31	15.7	0.816	-0.004
-0.004 5	Lemoore	27	13.9	0.819	-0.029
-0.029 6	Sequoias	31	20.4	0.934	0.267
0.267 7	Fresno City	32	15.1	1.014	0.221

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Sequoias	31	574-1644	34.9	118-479	24.6	53.5
53.5 2	Fresno City	32	747-1938	38.5	148-515	28.7	60.3
60.3 3	Lemoore	27	658-1846	35.6	166-598	27.8	63.3
63.3 4	Merced	31	762-1971	38.7	152-537	28.3	65.6
65.6 5	Reedley	26	690-1847	37.4	161-520	31.0	72.4
72.4 6	Porterville	26	788-1920	41.0	145-468	31.0	76.2
76.2 7	Taft	21	670-1570	42.7	160-486	32.9	86.0

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Lemoore	27	15.1	20.4	35.6	1.1
1.1 2	Fresno City	32	11.8	23.0	34.8	6.8
6.8 3	Sequoias	31	9.9	23.2	33.1	12.2
12.2 4	Merced	31	12.0	24.5	36.5	2.0
2.0 5	Reedley	26	16.2	26.0	42.2	-4.2
-4.2 6	Porterville	26	18.2	27.0	45.2	-11.0
-11.0 7	Taft	21	19.7	29.0	48.6	-13.9

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Lemoore	27	14.1	4.9	4.1	12.9
12.9 2	Taft	21	14.4	6.6	3.7	18.5
18.5 3	Porterville	26	15.7	10.3	2.6	13.5
13.5 4	Reedley	26	17.6	8.5	1.0	15.5
15.5 5	Merced	31	19.0	10.0	2.5	11.9
11.9 6	Fresno City	32	20.0	12.8	2.8	9.6
9.6 7	Sequoias	31	26.1	14.5	2.9	7.7

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Porterville	26	12.4	0.955	-0.224
-0.224 2	Taft	21	15.6	1.057	-0.441
-0.441 3	Sequoias	31	15.6	0.667	0.267
0.267 4	Lemoore	27	17.4	0.847	-0.029
-0.029 5	Merced	31	17.5	0.820	-0.004
-0.004 6	Fresno City	32	17.6	0.793	0.221
0.221 7	Reedley	26	18.0	0.873	-0.072

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Taft	12	267-745	35.8	30-140	21.4	67-131	51.1	52.6
52.6 2	Lemoore	12	272-676	40.2	29-141	20.6	123-210	58.6	58.0
58.0 3	Porterville	12	256-730	35.1	72-272	26.5	112-178	62.9	58.0
58.0 3	Merced	12	306-809	37.8	41-173	23.7	188-311	60.5	70.1
70.1 5	Reedley	12	300-803	37.4	59-225	26.2	185-296	62.5	70.1
70.1 5	Sequoias	12	383-978	39.2	87-297	29.3	112-193	58.0	80.4
80.4 7	Fresno City	12	397-894	44.4	85-285	29.8	180-293	61.4	88.3

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Porterville	12	9.5	22.8	32.3	-17.3
-17.3 2	Taft	12	9.6	21.5	31.1	-16.3
-16.3 3	Reedley	12	15.3	27.8	43.1	3.0
3.0 4	Lemoore	12	13.0	25.4	38.4	1.9
1.9 5	Fresno City	12	17.8	26.3	44.2	9.6
9.6 6	Merced	12	17.2	25.3	42.4	3.9
3.9 7	Sequoias	12	22.2	24.3	46.4	15.1

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Fresno City	12	15.9	6.5	3.8	19.4
19.4 2	Sequoias	12	17.7	7.0	3.2	14.0
14.0 3	Lemoore	12	20.7	12.9	3.5	9.8
9.8 4	Merced	12	19.0	12.2	2.9	12.0
12.0 5	Reedley	12	21.3	11.8	3.9	8.1
8.1 6	Porterville	12	24.0	14.6	3.4	9.2
9.2 7	Taft	12	25.4	16.8	2.3	7.8

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Taft	12	7.8	0.631	-0.430
-0.430 2	Porterville	12	14.8	0.701	-0.273
-0.273 3	Reedley	12	18.4	0.822	-0.030
-0.030 4	Merced	12	18.3	0.853	0.069
0.069 5	Lemoore	12	14.3	0.797	-0.045
-0.045 6	Sequoias	12	21.4	0.946	0.342
0.342 7	Fresno City	12	15.5	1.041	0.352

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Sequoias	12	208-588	35.4	33-146	22.6	50.8
50.8 2	Fresno City	12	265-708	37.4	38-155	24.5	53.9
53.9 3	Lemoore	12	308-862	35.7	68-292	23.3	65.4
65.4 4	Merced	12	307-795	38.6	45-192	23.4	68.0
68.0 5	Reedley	12	323-857	37.7	72-253	28.5	73.5
73.5 6	Porterville	12	390-936	41.7	57-204	27.9	79.5
79.5 7	Taft	12	380-889	42.7	90-291	30.9	86.3

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Lemoore	12	15.0	21.5	36.5	1.9
1.9 2	Fresno City	12	11.6	23.0	34.6	9.6
9.6 3	Sequoias	12	8.3	23.0	31.3	15.1
15.1 4	Merced	12	12.4	26.1	38.5	3.9
3.9 5	Reedley	12	15.3	24.8	40.1	3.0
3.0 6	Porterville	12	22.8	26.7	49.5	-17.3
-17.3 7	Taft	12	19.1	28.3	47.3	-16.3

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Lemoore	12	13.4	5.5	4.4	10.5
10.5 2	Taft	12	14.2	5.9	4.0	17.1
17.1 3	Porterville	12	18.2	9.4	2.7	14.8
14.8 4	Reedley	12	19.3	9.8	0.9	13.7
13.7 5	Merced	12	21.7	12.7	3.8	10.4
10.4 6	Fresno City	12	25.2	17.8	3.0	6.6
6.6 7	Sequoias	12	32.0	20.7	4.3	7.2

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Porterville	12	13.9	0.973	-0.273
-0.273 2	Taft	12	13.8	1.060	-0.430
-0.430 3	Sequoias	12	14.5	0.604	0.342
0.342 4	Lemoore	12	14.3	0.843	-0.045
-0.045 5	Merced	12	19.1	0.783	0.069
0.069 6	Fresno City	12	16.2	0.688	0.352
0.352 7	Reedley	12	18.8	0.853	-0.030