California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Imperial Valley	28	602-1702	35.4	191-647	29.5	297-434	68.4	60.4
60.4 2	Cuyamaca	28	610-1524	40.0	199-607	32.8	300-423	70.9	61.4
61.4 3	Grossmont	28	698-1622	43.0	153-525	29.1	365-541	67.5	69.0
69.0 4	MiraCosta	28	720-1694	42.5	195-574	34.0	331-514	64.4	70.2
70.2 5	San Diego Mesa	28	771-1804	42.7	169-536	31.5	313-540	58.0	72.3
72.3 6	Palomar	29	783-1884	41.6	287-787	36.5	354-493	71.8	76.2
76.2 7	San Diego Miramar	28	770-1725	44.6	240-660	36.4	356-470	75.7	76.3
76.3 8	Southwestern	29	856-1786	47.9	240-620	38.7	321-503	63.8	85.9
85.9 9	San Diego City	31	1000-2131	46.9	234-637	36.7	498-729	68.3	88.2

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Cuyamaca	28	7.5	23.8	31.2	-5.6
-5.6 2	Grossmont	28	9.6	24.2	33.8	-6.2
-6.2 3	San Diego Miramar	28	10.1	25.1	35.1	0.7
0.7 4	Imperial Valley	28	10.5	21.9	32.4	-6.5
-6.5 5	MiraCosta	28	11.4	22.8	34.2	-0.8
-0.8 6	San Diego Mesa	28	12.1	27.0	39.1	0.2
0.2 7	Southwestern	29	12.4	29.9	42.3	6.5
6.5 8	Palomar	29	13.0	24.3	37.3	2.2
2.2 9	San Diego City	31	14.4	29.9	44.4	9.1

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Cuyamaca	28	13.3	7.2	2.3	11.8
11.8 2	Southwestern	29	13.8	6.9	1.8	17.1
17.1 3	MiraCosta	28	13.9	8.3	3.6	13.3
13.3 4	Palomar	29	13.9	6.6	3.7	14.9
14.9 5	San Diego Miramar	28	14.5	7.5	2.6	14.0
14.0 6	San Diego City	31	15.7	8.1	3.3	18.3
18.3 7	San Diego Mesa	28	16.4	8.8	4.8	15.7
15.7 8	Grossmont	28	18.0	9.8	4.2	14.1
14.1 9	Imperial Valley	28	19.8	11.1	3.1	9.5

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Cuyamaca	28	2.2	0.905	-0.217
-0.217 2	Grossmont	28	14.8	0.909	-0.233
-0.233 3	San Diego City	31	19.6	1.078	0.199
0.199 4	Imperial Valley	28	17.5	-	-
- 5	MiraCosta	28	17.2	-	-
- 5	Palomar	29	18.4	-	-
- 5	San Diego Mesa	28	13.7	-	-
- 5	San Diego Miramar	28	17.1	-	-
- 5	Southwestern	29	10.9	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	MiraCosta	28	651-1572	41.4	157-499	31.5	65.8
65.8 2	Southwestern	29	697-1887	36.9	192-671	28.6	66.8
66.8 3	Palomar	29	720-1675	43.0	206-608	33.9	70.0
70.0 4	San Diego City	31	791-1865	42.4	173-573	30.2	70.9
70.9 5	San Diego Miramar	28	687-1640	41.9	169-562	30.1	73.5
73.5 6	Cuyamaca	28	806-1727	46.7	239-645	37.1	75.0
75.0 7	San Diego Mesa	28	815-1836	44.4	199-591	33.7	76.7
76.7 8	Grossmont	28	876-1875	46.7	277-729	38.0	85.4
85.4 9	Imperial Valley	28	846-1749	48.4	215-590	36.4	88.3

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	San Diego Miramar	28	11.1	23.3	34.5	0.7
0.7 2	Southwestern	29	11.1	24.6	35.8	6.5
6.5 3	San Diego City	31	10.5	24.7	35.3	9.1
9.1 4	Palomar	29	10.1	25.1	35.1	2.2
2.2 5	MiraCosta	28	9.8	25.1	35.0	-0.8
-0.8 6	Cuyamaca	28	11.6	25.3	36.9	-5.6
-5.6 7	Imperial Valley	28	12.1	26.8	38.9	-6.5
-6.5 8	Grossmont	28	13.0	27.1	40.0	-6.2
-6.2 9	San Diego Mesa	28	11.8	27.1	38.9	0.2

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Cuyamaca	28	10.3	5.1	3.3	16.1
16.1 2	Grossmont	28	11.8	6.0	2.1	18.7
18.7 3	Imperial Valley	28	12.2	5.3	2.7	17.8
17.8 4	San Diego Miramar	28	12.5	6.9	2.1	12.5
12.5 5	Southwestern	29	15.1	8.9	6.3	9.9
9.9 6	San Diego Mesa	28	15.1	8.2	2.5	14.5
14.5 7	Palomar	29	17.4	10.0	1.3	12.4
12.4 8	MiraCosta	28	18.6	9.1	3.3	12.7
12.7 9	San Diego City	31	20.5	11.5	5.0	12.8

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Imperial Valley	28	11.6	-	-
- 2	San Diego Miramar	28	13.1	-	-
- 2	Cuyamaca	28	13.5	1.121	-0.217
-0.217 4	MiraCosta	28	14.0	-	-
- 5	San Diego Mesa	28	14.1	-	-
- 5	Palomar	29	14.9	-	-
- 5	Southwestern	29	15.4	-	-
- 5	Grossmont	28	16.1	1.141	-0.233
-0.233 9	San Diego City	31	18.3	0.879	0.199

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Imperial Valley	16	364-1017	35.8	127-406	31.3	160-229	69.9	63.4
63.4 2	Cuyamaca	16	357-871	41.0	103-323	31.9	175-244	71.7	61.9
61.9 3	Grossmont	16	414-938	44.1	76-276	27.5	214-308	69.5	70.0
70.0 4	MiraCosta	16	399-936	42.6	100-319	31.3	191-287	66.6	68.0
68.0 5	San Diego Mesa	16	453-1039	43.6	104-299	34.8	176-299	58.9	74.1
74.1 6	Palomar	16	421-1045	40.3	153-443	34.5	191-278	68.7	74.1
74.1 6	San Diego Miramar	16	422-949	44.5	140-383	36.6	202-269	75.1	74.1
74.1 6	Southwestern	16	446-913	48.8	117-313	37.4	174-255	68.2	87.6
87.6 9	San Diego City	16	542-1151	47.1	136-356	38.2	272-382	71.2	93.3

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Cuyamaca	16	7.8	24.1	31.8	-4.1
-4.1 2	Grossmont	16	9.7	24.4	34.1	-6.1
-6.1 3	San Diego Miramar	16	8.1	23.3	31.4	-3.1
-3.1 4	Imperial Valley	16	10.1	21.9	32.1	-4.7
-4.7 5	MiraCosta	16	10.7	21.4	32.1	-0.1
-0.1 6	San Diego Mesa	16	12.4	26.1	38.4	0.0
0.0 7	Southwestern	16	11.5	28.4	39.9	5.3
5.3 8	Palomar	16	12.7	22.8	35.4	-0.1
-0.1 9	San Diego City	16	14.6	30.9	45.6	12.9

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Cuyamaca	16	13.3	7.3	2.4	11.8
11.8 2	Southwestern	16	10.9	5.7	2.0	15.5
15.5 3	MiraCosta	16	12.5	8.5	3.6	11.5
11.5 4	Palomar	16	12.2	6.3	3.6	13.8
13.8 5	San Diego Miramar	16	14.1	7.3	2.9	14.3
14.3 6	San Diego City	16	15.6	7.1	3.4	19.6
19.6 7	San Diego Mesa	16	14.9	8.0	4.8	17.7
17.7 8	Grossmont	16	17.1	9.3	4.1	13.3
13.3 9	Imperial Valley	16	18.8	10.3	3.2	9.6

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Cuyamaca	16	1.8	0.916	-0.200
-0.200 2	Grossmont	16	13.9	0.926	-0.194
-0.194 3	San Diego City	16	19.5	1.099	0.238
0.238 4	Imperial Valley	16	17.3	-	-
- 5	MiraCosta	16	14.3	-	-
- 5	Palomar	16	16.6	-	-
- 5	San Diego Mesa	16	12.0	-	-
- 5	San Diego Miramar	16	16.5	-	-
- 5	Southwestern	16	9.9	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	MiraCosta	16	355-883	40.2	90-276	32.6	63.0
63.0 2	Southwestern	16	371-1040	35.7	113-405	27.9	64.9
64.9 3	Palomar	16	390-928	42.0	112-329	34.0	68.9
68.9 4	San Diego City	16	394-946	41.6	88-284	31.0	69.3
69.3 5	San Diego Miramar	16	407-952	42.8	99-312	31.7	76.1
76.1 6	Cuyamaca	16	464-1019	45.5	160-420	38.1	76.0
76.0 7	San Diego Mesa	16	456-1019	44.7	107-336	31.8	75.2
75.2 8	Grossmont	16	494-1087	45.4	161-423	38.1	83.3
83.3 9	Imperial Valley	16	487-985	49.4	126-333	37.8	90.0

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	San Diego Miramar	16	10.5	24.1	34.6	-3.1
-3.1 2	Southwestern	16	11.1	23.5	34.6	5.3
5.3 3	San Diego City	16	9.7	22.9	32.6	12.9
12.9 4	Palomar	16	10.1	25.4	35.5	-0.1
-0.1 5	MiraCosta	16	9.1	23.2	32.3	-0.1
-0.1 5	Cuyamaca	16	11.1	24.8	35.9	-4.1
-4.1 7	Imperial Valley	16	10.4	26.4	36.8	-4.7
-4.7 8	Grossmont	16	13.5	26.8	40.3	-6.1
-6.1 9	San Diego Mesa	16	12.1	26.3	38.4	0.0

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Cuyamaca	16	9.6	4.6	3.3	18.4
18.4 2	Grossmont	16	11.3	6.2	2.5	18.4
18.4 2	Imperial Valley	16	12.1	5.4	2.8	17.8
17.8 4	San Diego Miramar	16	11.9	6.8	2.3	13.3
13.3 5	Southwestern	16	13.7	7.2	6.1	9.4
9.4 6	San Diego Mesa	16	14.7	8.3	3.0	14.0
14.0 7	Palomar	16	17.1	10.6	1.6	11.6
11.6 8	MiraCosta	16	18.1	8.4	2.9	12.1
12.1 9	San Diego City	16	20.9	12.5	5.5	12.1

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Imperial Valley	16	10.8	-	-
- 2	San Diego Miramar	16	12.4	-	-
- 2	Cuyamaca	16	12.7	1.116	-0.200
-0.200 4	MiraCosta	16	12.6	-	-
- 5	San Diego Mesa	16	13.1	-	-
- 5	Palomar	16	13.4	-	-
- 5	Southwestern	16	14.4	-	-
- 5	Grossmont	16	14.7	1.119	-0.194
-0.194 9	San Diego City	16	17.9	0.861	0.238