Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Victor Valley 40 1395 373 183 152 367 .267 .351 .386
.386 2 Barstow 40 1401 412 235 162 299 .294 .391 .383
.383 3 Canyons 42 1473 441 270 150 272 .299 .379 .461
.461 4 Glendale 45 1606 483 287 201 303 .301 .399 .432
.432 5 Citrus 40 1435 435 264 190 274 .303 .394 .459
.459 6 Antelope Valley 40 1463 448 252 178 285 .306 .390 .456
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Barstow 40 79 11 8 98
98 2 Victor Valley 40 87 3 24 114
114 3 Glendale 45 80 17 32 129
129 4 Canyons 42 87 14 41 142
142 5 Citrus 40 97 14 33 144
144 6 Antelope Valley 40 95 35 18 148
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Victor Valley 40 216 538 47 12
12 2 Barstow 40 264 537 34 9
9 3 Citrus 40 286 659 49 17
17 4 Antelope Valley 40 291 667 54 7
7 5 Canyons 42 294 679 32 6
6 6 Glendale 45 334 693 131 23
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Victor Valley 40 30 6 12 21 240 253 .95 1595
1595 2 Barstow 40 70 16 38 38 362 322 1.12 1687
1687 3 Citrus 40 33 13 22 22 310 361 .86 1693
1693 4 Canyons 42 49 16 22 26 387 369 1.05 1710
1710 5 Antelope Valley 40 36 19 18 20 361 336 1.07 1714
1714 6 Glendale 45 74 18 14 25 360 407 .88 1913
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Glendale 45 45 406.0 381 208 165 3.66
3.66 2 Canyons 42 42 371.0 375 192 166 4.03
4.03 3 Citrus 40 40 353.1 406 224 190 4.84
4.84 4 Barstow 40 40 351.2 469 347 250 6.40
6.40 5 Victor Valley 40 40 325.2 435 305 243 6.72
6.72 6 Antelope Valley 40 40 352.2 451 306 272 6.94
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 40 40 228 5.82 26 1.79
1.79 2 Barstow 40 40 230 5.89 39 -
- 3 Canyons 42 42 392 9.51 16 -
- 3 Citrus 40 40 335 8.53 17 -
- 3 Glendale 45 45 359 7.96 29 -
- 3 Victor Valley 40 40 178 4.92 22 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Victor Valley 40 1118 747 310 61 16 .945
.945 2 Barstow 40 1497 1025 403 69 15 .954
.954 3 Citrus 40 1442 1007 370 65 11 .955
.955 4 Glendale 45 1717 1184 468 65 11 .962
.962 5 Antelope Valley 40 1535 1004 478 53 6 .965
.965 6 Canyons 42 1537 1113 386 38 17 .975
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Victor Valley 40 30 78 8 .093 -
- 2 Canyons 42 23 49 8 .140 -
- 2 Barstow 40 17 55 10 .154 1
1 4 Antelope Valley 40 37 66 14 .175 -
- 5 Citrus 40 17 61 17 .218 -
- 5 Glendale 45 23 39 18 .316 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 180 9
9 2 Citrus 19 712 37
37 3 Antelope Valley 21 930 45
45 4 Glendale 19 1,499 79
79 5 Canyons 20 1,652 83
83 6 Barstow 20 2,000 100
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 707 195 89 68 196 .276 .350 .414
.414 2 Barstow 20 711 214 102 61 157 .301 .384 .378
.378 3 Canyons 20 703 225 152 74 115 .320 .399 .518
.518 4 Glendale 20 731 231 151 83 145 .316 .408 .490
.490 5 Citrus 20 732 231 150 87 133 .316 .399 .501
.501 6 Antelope Valley 20 748 230 132 84 157 .307 .386 .453
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Barstow 20 40 3 3 46
46 2 Victor Valley 20 45 1 17 63
63 3 Glendale 20 48 11 19 78
78 4 Canyons 20 44 7 27 78
78 4 Citrus 20 56 10 20 86
86 6 Antelope Valley 20 48 11 13 72
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 104 293 30 3
3 2 Barstow 20 112 269 20 5
5 3 Citrus 20 157 367 25 8
8 4 Antelope Valley 20 148 339 24 4
4 5 Canyons 20 156 364 21 3
3 6 Glendale 20 168 358 60 10
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 14 3 7 10 120 137 .88 799
799 2 Barstow 20 41 10 14 23 186 152 1.22 837
837 3 Citrus 20 19 7 12 9 157 183 .86 857
857 4 Canyons 20 25 10 5 18 182 182 1.00 817
817 5 Antelope Valley 20 18 11 5 8 159 176 .90 866
866 6 Glendale 20 35 6 7 7 140 182 .77 862
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Glendale 20 20 184.1 149 60 53 2.59
2.59 2 Canyons 20 20 178.1 155 71 59 2.98
2.98 3 Citrus 20 20 178.1 207 111 93 4.69
4.69 4 Barstow 20 20 174.2 249 199 140 7.21
7.21 5 Victor Valley 20 20 174.2 245 177 138 7.11
7.11 6 Antelope Valley 20 20 177.1 238 168 163 8.27
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 92 4.67 19 1.82
1.82 2 Barstow 20 20 110 5.67 26 -
- 3 Canyons 20 20 206 10.40 6 -
- 3 Citrus 20 20 179 9.03 8 -
- 3 Glendale 20 20 193 9.42 17 -
- 3 Victor Valley 20 20 80 4.12 13 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 576 381 164 31 9 .946
.946 2 Barstow 20 760 524 197 39 10 .949
.949 3 Citrus 20 673 484 157 32 5 .952
.952 4 Glendale 20 722 519 192 11 2 .985
.985 5 Antelope Valley 20 726 478 227 21 5 .971
.971 6 Canyons 20 724 535 173 16 5 .978
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Victor Valley 20 13 46 5 .098 -
- 2 Canyons 20 15 24 2 .077 -
- 2 Barstow 20 10 35 5 .125 -
- 2 Antelope Valley 20 22 38 2 .050 -
- 2 Citrus 20 7 29 6 .171 -
- 2 Glendale 20 8 8 5 .385 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
$value 1 Victor Valley 10 150 15
15 2 Citrus 10 394 39
39 3 Antelope Valley 10 405 41
41 4 Glendale 10 888 89
89 5 Canyons 10 827 83
83 6 Barstow 10 1,000 100