California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
416.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	1729	533	331	206	315	.308	.402	.437
339.0 2	Chaffey	40	1366	376	224	141	296	.275	.370	.387
454.0 3	Pasadena City	43	1464	402	178	132	268	.275	.355	.339
375.0 4	Rio Hondo	38	1337	359	165	111	236	.269	.348	.341
405.0 5	East Los Angeles	42	1414	375	208	166	265	.265	.369	.345

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
416.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	98	20	28	146
339.0 2	Chaffey	40	71	12	19	102
405.0 3	East Los Angeles	42	89	6	4	99
375.0 4	Rio Hondo	38	66	5	7	78
454.0 5	Pasadena City	43	50	16	4	70

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
416.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	380	755	66	21
339.0 2	Chaffey	40	254	528	62	19
405.0 3	East Los Angeles	42	246	488	66	25
454.0 4	Pasadena City	43	210	496	30	8
375.0 5	Rio Hondo	38	196	456	18	11

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
454.0 1	Pasadena City	43	59	14	35	46	454	333	1.36	1704
416.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	49	88	34	21	44	416	419	.99	2078
405.0 3	East Los Angeles	42	86	31	37	28	405	369	1.10	1734
375.0 4	Rio Hondo	38	58	11	26	21	375	330	1.14	1543
339.0 5	Chaffey	40	73	14	20	23	339	345	.98	1614

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
375.0 1	Rio Hondo	38	38	333.1	395	282	200	5.40
339.0 2	Chaffey	40	40	349.1	399	260	201	5.18
454.0 3	Pasadena City	43	43	380.0	402	233	181	4.29
405.0 4	East Los Angeles	42	42	373.0	374	212	163	3.93
416.0 5	Mt. San Antonio	49	49	440.0	425	238	186	3.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
339.0 1	Chaffey	40	40	278	7.16	24	-
375.0 2	Rio Hondo	38	38	265	7.16	19	-
405.0 3	East Los Angeles	42	42	298	7.19	19	-
416.0 4	Mt. San Antonio	49	49	372	7.61	13	-
454.0 5	Pasadena City	43	43	302	7.15	10	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
405.0 1	East Los Angeles	42	1663	1121	481	61	29	.963
416.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	49	1881	1291	510	80	26	.957
454.0 3	Pasadena City	43	1679	1140	466	73	34	.957
339.0 4	Chaffey	40	1541	1048	422	71	43	.954
375.0 5	Rio Hondo	38	1473	1000	392	81	30	.945

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
405.0 1	East Los Angeles	42	34	24	14	.368	3
454.0 2	Pasadena City	43	19	55	17	.236	-
339.0 3	Chaffey	40	14	39	12	.235	2
416.0 4	Mt. San Antonio	49	32	34	10	.227	1
375.0 5	Rio Hondo	38	18	42	9	.176	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
375.0 1	Rio Hondo	20	190,100	9,505
416.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	24	2,184	91
454.0 3	Pasadena City	21	1,331	64
405.0 4	East Los Angeles	17	74	4
339.0 5	Chaffey	20	80	4

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
187.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	770	242	145	78	125	.314	.395	.449
196.0 2	Chaffey	22	737	200	115	81	154	.271	.366	.387
240.0 3	Pasadena City	22	727	189	87	67	129	.260	.339	.318
221.0 4	Rio Hondo	22	756	189	81	49	133	.250	.319	.327
208.0 5	East Los Angeles	22	733	197	109	82	136	.269	.362	.351

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
187.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	48	7	14	69
196.0 2	Chaffey	22	44	7	9	60
208.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	48	3	2	53
221.0 4	Rio Hondo	22	35	4	5	44
240.0 5	Pasadena City	22	25	7	1	33

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
187.0 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	171	346	26	9
196.0 2	Chaffey	22	135	285	32	10
208.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	122	257	31	13
240.0 4	Pasadena City	22	103	231	12	6
221.0 5	Rio Hondo	22	87	247	12	5

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
240.0 1	Pasadena City	22	24	8	19	17	240	174	1.38	845
187.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	34	14	9	19	187	192	.97	905
208.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	36	19	21	16	208	198	1.05	891
221.0 4	Rio Hondo	22	30	5	10	10	221	197	1.12	850
196.0 5	Chaffey	22	33	8	11	16	196	187	1.05	870

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
221.0 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	190.2	227	152	112	5.29
196.0 2	Chaffey	22	22	195.1	212	122	86	3.96
240.0 3	Pasadena City	22	22	195.0	207	117	92	4.25
208.0 4	East Los Angeles	22	22	195.1	182	98	73	3.36
187.0 5	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	195.0	164	90	71	3.28

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
196.0 1	Chaffey	22	22	167	7.69	8	-
221.0 2	Rio Hondo	22	22	139	6.56	13	-
208.0 3	East Los Angeles	22	22	151	6.96	11	-
187.0 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	171	7.89	4	-
240.0 5	Pasadena City	22	22	144	6.65	5	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
208.0 1	East Los Angeles	22	875	588	256	31	16	.965
187.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	22	836	584	221	31	16	.963
240.0 3	Pasadena City	22	862	585	250	27	20	.969
196.0 4	Chaffey	22	870	586	245	39	20	.955
221.0 5	Rio Hondo	22	825	572	212	41	13	.950

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
208.0 1	East Los Angeles	22	21	12	7	.368	3
240.0 2	Pasadena City	22	10	27	11	.289	-
196.0 3	Chaffey	22	7	23	5	.179	1
187.0 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	13	13	4	.235	-
221.0 5	Rio Hondo	22	11	25	6	.194	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
221.0 1	Rio Hondo	11	100,100	9,100
187.0 2	Mt. San Antonio	11	789	72
240.0 3	Pasadena City	11	673	62
208.0 4	East Los Angeles	11	0	0
196.0 5	Chaffey	11	0	0