Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
1.125340599455041 1 San Diego Mesa 41 1444 478 272 154 221 .331 .412 .424
1.0629722921914357 2 Palomar 45 1623 531 287 175 229 .327 .413 .430
0.813953488372093 3 Southwestern 41 1478 456 265 184 233 .309 .392 .430
0.9651162790697675 4 Grossmont 40 1450 428 259 202 280 .295 .394 .457
0.8719346049046321 5 San Bernardino Valley 40 1442 420 241 169 214 .291 .382 .388
0.9650537634408602 6 San Diego City 39 1379 385 197 123 234 .279 .352 .371
0.7322834645669292 7 Mt. San Jacinto 40 1406 390 229 169 314 .277 .376 .405
1.5342465753424657 8 Imperial Valley 38 1232 319 142 109 301 .259 .337 .329
1.0802292263610316 9 Desert 40 1359 349 168 147 260 .257 .357 .333
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.9651162790697675 1 Grossmont 40 78 26 35 139
1.0629722921914357 2 Palomar 45 98 21 9 128
0.7322834645669292 3 Mt. San Jacinto 40 88 22 16 126
0.8719346049046321 4 San Bernardino Valley 40 97 11 7 115
0.813953488372093 5 Southwestern 41 63 25 22 110
1.125340599455041 6 San Diego Mesa 41 81 10 11 102
0.9650537634408602 7 San Diego City 39 67 21 6 94
1.0802292263610316 8 Desert 40 64 6 9 79
1.5342465753424657 9 Imperial Valley 38 52 11 4 67
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
1.0629722921914357 1 Palomar 45 324 698 50 13
0.9651162790697675 2 Grossmont 40 314 663 71 12
1.125340599455041 3 San Diego Mesa 41 297 612 60 15
0.813953488372093 4 Southwestern 41 293 635 31 12
0.8719346049046321 5 San Bernardino Valley 40 283 560 50 20
0.7322834645669292 6 Mt. San Jacinto 40 246 570 31 10
0.9650537634408602 7 San Diego City 39 245 512 59 15
1.0802292263610316 8 Desert 40 200 452 55 32
1.5342465753424657 9 Imperial Valley 38 163 405 21 10
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1.5342465753424657 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 4 3 39 336 219 1.53 1386
1.125340599455041 2 San Diego Mesa 41 57 16 64 29 413 367 1.13 1735
1.0802292263610316 3 Desert 40 71 12 21 24 377 349 1.08 1610
1.0629722921914357 4 Palomar 45 80 25 57 21 422 397 1.06 1960
0.9651162790697675 5 Grossmont 40 47 18 8 22 332 344 .97 1725
0.9650537634408602 6 San Diego City 39 40 14 16 25 359 372 .97 1572
0.8719346049046321 7 San Bernardino Valley 40 58 24 13 30 320 367 .87 1706
0.813953488372093 8 Southwestern 41 37 29 17 25 350 430 .81 1745
0.7322834645669292 9 Mt. San Jacinto 40 64 16 17 24 279 381 .73 1672
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.5342465753424657 1 Imperial Valley 38 38 297.0 467 401 333 10.09
1.0802292263610316 2 Desert 40 40 352.0 524 421 344 8.80
0.7322834645669292 3 Mt. San Jacinto 40 40 337.0 425 323 243 6.49
0.8719346049046321 4 San Bernardino Valley 40 40 358.0 460 303 235 5.91
0.9650537634408602 5 San Diego City 39 39 341.2 391 285 205 5.40
1.125340599455041 6 San Diego Mesa 41 41 360.1 441 255 209 5.22
0.9651162790697675 7 Grossmont 40 40 349.2 403 236 177 4.56
1.0629722921914357 8 Palomar 45 45 401.0 411 216 160 3.59
0.813953488372093 9 Southwestern 41 41 367.2 359 180 146 3.57
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.7322834645669292 1 Mt. San Jacinto 40 40 204 5.45 15 -
0.813953488372093 2 Southwestern 41 41 267 6.54 12 -
0.8719346049046321 3 San Bernardino Valley 40 40 255 6.41 20 -
0.9650537634408602 4 San Diego City 39 39 315 8.30 17 -
0.9651162790697675 5 Grossmont 40 40 216 5.56 15 -
1.0629722921914357 6 Palomar 45 45 389 8.73 10 -
1.0802292263610316 7 Desert 40 40 197 5.04 27 -
1.125340599455041 8 San Diego Mesa 41 41 259 6.47 15 -
1.5342465753424657 9 Imperial Valley 38 38 137 4.15 17 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
1.125340599455041 1 San Diego Mesa 41 1567 1081 432 54 17 .966
0.813953488372093 2 Southwestern 41 1566 1103 404 59 13 .962
1.0629722921914357 3 Palomar 45 1758 1171 520 67 14 .962
1.0802292263610316 4 Desert 40 1513 1054 399 60 23 .960
1.5342465753424657 5 Imperial Valley 38 1329 891 374 64 33 .952
0.9650537634408602 6 San Diego City 39 1443 1025 342 76 12 .947
0.8719346049046321 7 San Bernardino Valley 40 1600 1065 443 92 16 .943
0.7322834645669292 8 Mt. San Jacinto 40 1492 1011 395 86 23 .942
0.9651162790697675 9 Grossmont 40 1567 1040 435 92 17 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
1.125340599455041 1 San Diego Mesa 41 31 29 19 .396 1
1.0629722921914357 2 Palomar 45 22 37 15 .288 1
0.8719346049046321 3 San Bernardino Valley 40 30 45 17 .274 3
0.813953488372093 4 Southwestern 41 23 51 15 .227 -
0.9650537634408602 5 San Diego City 39 22 58 17 .227 -
0.9651162790697675 6 Grossmont 40 34 65 16 .198 3
0.7322834645669292 7 Mt. San Jacinto 40 25 64 14 .179 1
1.5342465753424657 8 Imperial Valley 38 24 70 12 .146 1
1.0802292263610316 9 Desert 40 33 93 15 .139 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
1.0802292263610316 1 Desert 21 1,525 73
0.7322834645669292 2 Mt. San Jacinto 19 1,145 60
0.9650537634408602 3 San Diego City 21 1,245 59
0.8719346049046321 4 San Bernardino Valley 21 658 31
1.5342465753424657 5 Imperial Valley 16 50 3
0.9651162790697675 6 Grossmont 21 35 2
0.813953488372093 7 Southwestern 20 0 0
1.0629722921914357 8 Palomar 24 0 0
1.125340599455041 9 San Diego Mesa 20 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.9741379310344828 1 San Diego Mesa 24 872 305 185 95 130 .350 .433 .438
0.9388646288209607 2 Palomar 24 879 307 177 99 104 .349 .432 .462
0.7586206896551724 3 Southwestern 24 863 255 148 102 129 .295 .380 .408
1.0049751243781095 4 Grossmont 24 883 269 172 130 160 .305 .406 .467
0.8666666666666667 5 San Bernardino Valley 24 867 256 150 120 134 .295 .400 .392
0.8938775510204081 6 San Diego City 24 848 244 120 77 130 .288 .363 .373
0.6047430830039525 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 856 259 164 117 175 .303 .407 .450
1.6433566433566433 8 Imperial Valley 24 818 218 100 67 204 .267 .340 .346
0.9422222222222222 9 Desert 24 827 229 115 86 138 .277 .367 .372
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
1.0049751243781095 1 Grossmont 24 49 14 22 85
0.9388646288209607 2 Palomar 24 55 13 6 74
0.6047430830039525 3 Mt. San Jacinto 24 60 15 12 87
0.8666666666666667 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 49 10 5 64
0.7586206896551724 5 Southwestern 24 32 13 13 58
0.9741379310344828 6 San Diego Mesa 24 49 5 6 60
0.8938775510204081 7 San Diego City 24 37 13 3 53
0.9422222222222222 8 Desert 24 46 6 7 59
1.6433566433566433 9 Imperial Valley 24 33 10 4 47
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.9388646288209607 1 Palomar 24 201 406 29 7
1.0049751243781095 2 Grossmont 24 205 412 49 3
0.9741379310344828 3 San Diego Mesa 24 199 382 39 8
0.7586206896551724 4 Southwestern 24 165 352 18 8
0.8666666666666667 5 San Bernardino Valley 24 185 340 36 14
0.6047430830039525 6 Mt. San Jacinto 24 175 385 24 7
0.8938775510204081 7 San Diego City 24 152 316 31 10
0.9422222222222222 8 Desert 24 136 308 27 17
1.6433566433566433 9 Imperial Valley 24 116 283 18 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1.6433566433566433 1 Imperial Valley 24 25 2 3 27 235 143 1.64 915
0.9741379310344828 2 San Diego Mesa 24 40 9 38 17 226 232 .97 1054
0.9422222222222222 3 Desert 24 37 8 15 16 212 225 .94 973
0.9388646288209607 4 Palomar 24 45 20 33 12 215 229 .94 1076
1.0049751243781095 5 Grossmont 24 31 14 3 15 202 201 1.00 1061
0.8938775510204081 6 San Diego City 24 29 10 12 17 219 245 .89 976
0.8666666666666667 7 San Bernardino Valley 24 39 11 8 21 208 240 .87 1045
0.7586206896551724 8 Southwestern 24 25 14 8 18 198 261 .76 1012
0.6047430830039525 9 Mt. San Jacinto 24 43 13 10 13 153 253 .60 1039
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.6433566433566433 1 Imperial Valley 24 24 205.2 316 272 233 10.20
0.9422222222222222 2 Desert 24 24 208.0 307 226 184 7.96
0.6047430830039525 3 Mt. San Jacinto 24 24 201.0 254 189 141 6.31
0.8666666666666667 4 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 213.0 268 166 129 5.45
0.8938775510204081 5 San Diego City 24 24 210.0 253 178 123 5.27
0.9741379310344828 6 San Diego Mesa 24 24 211.0 258 145 126 5.37
1.0049751243781095 7 Grossmont 24 24 209.2 249 141 106 4.55
0.9388646288209607 8 Palomar 24 24 214.0 200 103 80 3.36
0.7586206896551724 9 Southwestern 24 24 216.2 222 103 88 3.66
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.6047430830039525 1 Mt. San Jacinto 24 24 124 5.55 10 -
0.7586206896551724 2 Southwestern 24 24 154 6.40 5 -
0.8666666666666667 3 San Bernardino Valley 24 24 147 6.21 9 -
0.8938775510204081 4 San Diego City 24 24 193 8.27 11 -
1.0049751243781095 5 Grossmont 24 24 123 5.28 6 -
0.9388646288209607 6 Palomar 24 24 207 8.71 3 -
0.9422222222222222 7 Desert 24 24 116 5.02 13 -
0.9741379310344828 8 San Diego Mesa 24 24 162 6.91 8 -
1.6433566433566433 9 Imperial Valley 24 24 75 3.28 13 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9741379310344828 1 San Diego Mesa 24 909 633 254 22 11 .976
0.7586206896551724 2 Southwestern 24 920 650 235 35 7 .962
0.9388646288209607 3 Palomar 24 910 610 272 28 8 .969
0.9422222222222222 4 Desert 24 889 622 230 37 15 .958
1.6433566433566433 5 Imperial Valley 24 905 617 243 45 15 .950
0.8938775510204081 6 San Diego City 24 883 630 207 46 10 .948
0.8666666666666667 7 San Bernardino Valley 24 950 631 269 50 8 .947
0.6047430830039525 8 Mt. San Jacinto 24 879 603 229 47 8 .947
1.0049751243781095 9 Grossmont 24 927 620 254 53 12 .943
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9741379310344828 1 San Diego Mesa 24 18 17 9 .346 -
0.9388646288209607 2 Palomar 24 15 14 6 .300 1
0.8666666666666667 3 San Bernardino Valley 24 21 28 8 .222 1
0.7586206896551724 4 Southwestern 24 15 27 8 .229 -
0.8938775510204081 5 San Diego City 24 12 37 11 .229 -
1.0049751243781095 6 Grossmont 24 19 34 8 .190 1
0.6047430830039525 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 16 30 11 .268 -
1.6433566433566433 8 Imperial Valley 24 19 40 9 .184 -
0.9422222222222222 9 Desert 24 21 44 6 .120 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.9422222222222222 1 Desert 12 858 72
0.6047430830039525 2 Mt. San Jacinto 12 848 71
0.8938775510204081 3 San Diego City 12 610 51
0.8666666666666667 4 San Bernardino Valley 12 130 11
1.6433566433566433 5 Imperial Valley 12 0 0
1.0049751243781095 6 Grossmont 12 0 0
0.7586206896551724 7 Southwestern 12 0 0
0.9388646288209607 8 Palomar 12 0 0
0.9741379310344828 9 San Diego Mesa 12 0 0