California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
2.0 1	LA Mission	43	1236	418	276	129	148	.338	.414	.524
4.0 2	Citrus	40	1112	354	185	103	123	.318	.385	.449
8.0 3	Bakersfield	43	1180	373	217	108	136	.316	.381	.473
9.0 4	Antelope Valley	43	1074	321	197	117	176	.299	.380	.480
8.0 5	Canyons	40	1043	305	195	135	134	.292	.381	.422
2.0 6	Glendale	36	905	231	114	82	127	.255	.325	.323
.323 7	LA Valley	33	736	161	69	60	129	.219	.290	.281

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
2.0 1	LA Mission	43	93	13	37	143
8.0 2	Bakersfield	43	68	12	31	111
9.0 3	Antelope Valley	43	60	9	39	108
4.0 4	Citrus	40	75	8	18	101
8.0 5	Canyons	40	59	23	10	92
2.0 6	Glendale	36	25	12	4	41
41 7	LA Valley	33	26	1	6	33

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
2.0 1	LA Mission	43	293	648	59	8
8.0 2	Bakersfield	43	238	558	24	8
4.0 3	Citrus	40	219	499	32	6
9.0 4	Antelope Valley	43	213	516	24	6
8.0 5	Canyons	40	213	440	95	20
2.0 6	Glendale	36	139	292	15	4
4 7	LA Valley	33	77	207	20	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
2.0 1	LA Mission	43	38	9	25	11	261	390	.67	1437
8.0 2	Bakersfield	43	23	11	22	16	300	353	.85	1344
9.0 3	Antelope Valley	43	32	14	37	20	237	295	.80	1274
4.0 4	Citrus	40	22	6	8	15	251	337	.74	1251
8.0 5	Canyons	40	17	6	21	2	270	291	.93	1222
2.0 6	Glendale	36	14	4	17	11	316	198	1.60	1022
1022 7	LA Valley	33	15	4	10	13	234	167	1.40	825

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	LA Valley	33	33	185.1	330	273	201	7.59
2.0 2	Glendale	36	36	213.2	358	275	215	7.04
2.0 2	LA Mission	43	43	278.2	337	209	174	4.37
4.0 4	Citrus	40	40	255.2	314	197	143	3.92
8.0 5	Bakersfield	43	43	288.0	343	182	158	3.84
9.0 6	Antelope Valley	43	43	274.0	315	181	125	3.19
8.0 7	Canyons	40	40	258.1	274	152	111	3.01

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
9.0 1	Antelope Valley	43	43	167	4.27	18	-
8.0 2	Bakersfield	43	43	137	3.33	14	-
8.0 2	Canyons	40	40	123	3.33	13	-
4.0 4	Citrus	40	40	68	1.86	16	-
2.0 5	Glendale	36	36	62	2.03	21	-
2.0 5	LA Mission	43	43	167	4.19	19	-
- 7	LA Valley	33	33	65	2.46	21	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
8.0 1	Bakersfield	43	1311	862	401	48	16	.963
9.0 2	Antelope Valley	43	1172	822	298	52	16	.956
4.0 3	Citrus	40	1212	746	404	62	16	.949
2.0 4	LA Mission	43	1193	817	309	67	13	.944
8.0 5	Canyons	40	1167	775	321	71	11	.939
.939 6	LA Valley	33	840	523	262	55	8	.935
2.0 7	Glendale	36	1023	641	309	73	10	.929

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
2.0 1	LA Mission	43	4	38	11	.224	0
0 2	LA Valley	33	11	61	13	.176	0
8.0 3	Bakersfield	43	20	57	11	.162	0
4.0 4	Citrus	40	19	59	8	.119	0
8.0 5	Canyons	40	14	43	5	.104	0
2.0 6	Glendale	36	15	62	5	.075	0
9.0 7	Antelope Valley	43	12	40	3	.070	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
4.0 1	Citrus	21.0	2,054	98
8.0 2	Canyons	21.0	1,065	51
51 3	LA Valley	16.0	750	47
2.0 4	Glendale	13.0	42	4
9.0 5	Antelope Valley	23.0	0	0
8.0 6	Bakersfield	25.0	0	0
2.0 7	LA Mission	8.0	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
$value 1	LA Mission	18	525	199	144	60	50	.379	.456	.594
1.0 2	Citrus	18	507	154	66	44	59	.304	.369	.398
5.0 3	Bakersfield	17	477	168	113	48	43	.352	.422	.547
6.0 4	Antelope Valley	18	470	155	110	52	69	.330	.407	.538
3.0 5	Canyons	18	502	165	110	73	54	.329	.420	.458
.458 6	Glendale	18	425	94	40	46	72	.221	.308	.294
.294 7	LA Valley	17	348	74	19	36	44	.213	.304	.282

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
$value 1	LA Mission	18	42	4	21	67
5.0 2	Bakersfield	17	25	7	18	50
6.0 3	Antelope Valley	18	28	2	22	52
1.0 4	Citrus	18	34	1	4	39
3.0 5	Canyons	18	28	11	5	44
44 6	Glendale	18	10	6	3	19
19 7	LA Valley	17	10	1	4	15

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
$value 1	LA Mission	18	151	312	31	4
5.0 2	Bakersfield	17	126	261	10	4
1.0 3	Citrus	18	83	202	15	2
6.0 4	Antelope Valley	18	114	253	9	2
3.0 5	Canyons	18	122	230	56	12
12 6	Glendale	18	45	125	6	1
1 7	LA Valley	17	22	98	9	2

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
$value 1	LA Mission	18	18	5	9	8	128	142	.90	617
5.0 2	Bakersfield	17	13	5	13	10	119	140	.85	556
6.0 3	Antelope Valley	18	15	8	15	7	113	127	.89	560
1.0 4	Citrus	18	9	1	4	4	127	152	.84	565
3.0 5	Canyons	18	8	3	9	1	126	123	1.02	595
595 6	Glendale	18	7	0	11	7	172	80	2.15	489
489 7	LA Valley	17	10	1	4	7	137	93	1.47	399

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	LA Valley	17	17	91.2	169	150	113	8.63
8.63 2	Glendale	18	18	107.1	201	162	142	9.26
9.26 3	LA Mission	18	18	112.0	139	101	84	5.25
1.0 4	Citrus	18	18	117.1	136	74	57	3.40
5.0 5	Bakersfield	17	17	113.0	119	50	42	2.60
6.0 6	Antelope Valley	18	18	119.0	127	62	43	2.53
3.0 7	Canyons	18	18	117.2	118	64	47	2.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
6.0 1	Antelope Valley	18	18	72	4.24	11	-
5.0 2	Bakersfield	17	17	65	4.03	9	-
3.0 3	Canyons	18	18	74	4.40	8	-
1.0 4	Citrus	18	18	30	1.79	9	-
- 5	Glendale	18	18	30	1.96	14	-
- 5	LA Mission	18	18	79	4.94	7	-
- 5	LA Valley	17	17	41	3.13	18	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
5.0 1	Bakersfield	17	508	338	153	17	4	.967
6.0 2	Antelope Valley	18	507	357	132	18	8	.964
1.0 3	Citrus	18	544	352	171	21	6	.961
.961 4	LA Mission	18	491	336	126	29	9	.941
3.0 5	Canyons	18	523	353	141	29	2	.945
.945 6	LA Valley	17	418	272	120	26	6	.938
.938 7	Glendale	18	492	322	142	28	5	.943

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
$value 1	LA Mission	18	3	15	4	.211	0
0 2	LA Valley	17	4	24	7	.226	0
5.0 3	Bakersfield	17	7	14	4	.222	0
1.0 4	Citrus	18	9	16	4	.200	0
3.0 5	Canyons	18	8	12	1	.077	0
0 6	Glendale	18	7	38	1	.026	0
6.0 7	Antelope Valley	18	7	17	2	.105	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
1.0 1	Citrus	9.0	894	100
3.0 2	Canyons	9.0	445	50
50 3	LA Valley	10.0	450	45
45 4	Glendale	8.0	42	6
6.0 5	Antelope Valley	10.0	0	0
5.0 6	Bakersfield	9.0	0	0
0 7	LA Mission	5.0	0	0