Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.7052117263843645 1 Reedley 46 1666 522 329 200 314 .313 .398 .444
4.135332252836305 2 Fresno City 46 1635 494 348 267 341 .302 .416 .454
7.947692307692308 3 Coalinga 37 1315 384 216 143 299 .292 .383 .384
5.837209302325581 4 Merced 43 1532 443 293 211 310 .289 .392 .386
5.434583714547118 5 Sequoias 41 1447 400 214 174 300 .276 .374 .367
6.3 6 Taft 40 1366 366 200 167 279 .268 .366 .372
11.196428571428571 7 Porterville 40 1378 361 176 178 315 .262 .367 .329
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
4.135332252836305 1 Fresno City 46 94 8 46 148
4.7052117263843645 2 Reedley 46 104 18 26 148
5.434583714547118 3 Sequoias 41 78 7 13 98
5.837209302325581 4 Merced 43 67 12 19 98
6.3 5 Taft 40 63 8 21 92
7.947692307692308 6 Coalinga 37 60 8 15 83
11.196428571428571 7 Porterville 40 65 5 6 76
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
4.135332252836305 1 Fresno City 46 395 742 49 16
4.7052117263843645 2 Reedley 46 383 740 28 8
5.837209302325581 3 Merced 43 348 591 51 8
5.434583714547118 4 Sequoias 41 250 531 23 17
7.947692307692308 5 Coalinga 37 242 505 77 22
6.3 6 Taft 40 229 508 67 24
11.196428571428571 7 Porterville 40 205 454 25 9
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
4.135332252836305 1 Fresno City 46 74 32 15 21 275 276 1.00 2023
4.7052117263843645 2 Reedley 46 55 29 34 16 392 384 1.02 1984
5.837209302325581 3 Merced 43 63 21 42 9 404 344 1.17 1869
5.434583714547118 4 Sequoias 41 57 11 18 23 372 320 1.16 1707
11.196428571428571 5 Porterville 40 60 14 11 25 333 334 1.00 1641
6.3 6 Taft 40 54 16 21 24 338 355 .95 1624
7.947692307692308 7 Coalinga 37 63 21 16 7 329 267 1.23 1558
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
11.196428571428571 1 Porterville 40 40 336.0 478 501 418 11.20
7.947692307692308 2 Coalinga 37 37 325.0 436 340 287 7.95
6.3 3 Taft 40 40 350.0 433 294 245 6.30
5.837209302325581 4 Merced 43 43 387.0 402 264 251 5.84
5.434583714547118 5 Sequoias 41 41 364.1 449 272 220 5.43
4.7052117263843645 6 Reedley 46 46 409.1 418 280 214 4.71
4.135332252836305 7 Fresno City 46 46 411.1 427 225 189 4.14
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
11.196428571428571 1 Porterville 40 40 258 6.91 27 2.39
7.947692307692308 2 Coalinga 37 37 273 7.56 13 1.90
5.434583714547118 3 Sequoias 41 41 255 6.30 15 1.74
6.3 4 Taft 40 40 269 6.92 23 1.74
4.7052117263843645 5 Reedley 46 46 351 7.72 28 1.59
5.837209302325581 6 Merced 43 43 276 6.42 26 1.51
4.135332252836305 7 Fresno City 46 46 387 8.47 14 1.34
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
5.837209302325581 1 Merced 43 1699 1162 476 61 26 .964
4.135332252836305 2 Fresno City 46 1769 1230 473 66 17 .963
5.434583714547118 3 Sequoias 41 1581 1092 429 60 18 .962
4.7052117263843645 4 Reedley 46 1762 1228 458 76 26 .957
6.3 5 Taft 40 1550 1050 433 67 13 .957
11.196428571428571 6 Porterville 40 1451 1006 330 115 36 .921
7.947692307692308 7 Coalinga 37 1411 978 321 112 26 .921
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
5.434583714547118 1 Sequoias 41 36 37 16 .302 0
6.3 2 Taft 40 21 46 19 .292 1
7.947692307692308 3 Coalinga 37 6 40 16 .286 3
4.135332252836305 4 Fresno City 46 39 42 14 .250 0
4.7052117263843645 5 Reedley 46 24 38 10 .208 1
5.837209302325581 6 Merced 43 15 44 11 .200 2
11.196428571428571 7 Porterville 40 13 93 15 .139 2
Rk Team home games attend avg
4.7052117263843645 1 Reedley 25 2,626 106
6.3 2 Taft 21 1,225 59
4.135332252836305 3 Fresno City 23 0 0
5.434583714547118 4 Sequoias 24 0 0
5.837209302325581 5 Merced 19 0 0
7.947692307692308 6 Coalinga 21 0 0
11.196428571428571 7 Porterville 19 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
4.098591549295775 1 Reedley 24 866 257 156 95 154 .297 .381 .411
3.796875 2 Fresno City 24 858 274 201 150 165 .319 .434 .498
8.5968 3 Coalinga 24 871 274 162 93 180 .315 .399 .418
5.408450704225352 4 Merced 24 867 268 200 126 162 .309 .410 .416
4.647887323943662 5 Sequoias 24 843 234 127 101 149 .278 .374 .380
6.403846153846154 6 Taft 24 849 250 140 94 152 .294 .378 .412
11.809756097560976 7 Porterville 24 817 197 82 100 194 .241 .343 .308
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
3.796875 1 Fresno City 24 58 7 27 92
4.098591549295775 2 Reedley 24 43 13 10 66
4.647887323943662 3 Sequoias 24 44 6 10 60
5.408450704225352 4 Merced 24 39 9 12 60
6.403846153846154 5 Taft 24 49 3 15 67
8.5968 6 Coalinga 24 41 5 13 59
11.809756097560976 7 Porterville 24 38 1 5 44
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
3.796875 1 Fresno City 24 227 427 29 9
4.098591549295775 2 Reedley 24 183 356 15 4
5.408450704225352 3 Merced 24 229 361 33 6
4.647887323943662 4 Sequoias 24 153 320 15 12
8.5968 5 Coalinga 24 181 364 45 11
6.403846153846154 6 Taft 24 156 350 40 18
11.809756097560976 7 Porterville 24 100 252 14 5
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
3.796875 1 Fresno City 24 39 20 10 11 132 127 1.04 1077
4.098591549295775 2 Reedley 24 30 11 16 6 204 212 .96 1018
5.408450704225352 3 Merced 24 32 14 22 3 216 186 1.16 1061
4.647887323943662 4 Sequoias 24 33 7 10 9 220 197 1.12 994
11.809756097560976 5 Porterville 24 31 8 6 13 204 196 1.04 962
6.403846153846154 6 Taft 24 28 12 9 8 200 224 .89 992
8.5968 7 Coalinga 24 40 16 14 6 214 172 1.24 1034
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
11.809756097560976 1 Porterville 24 24 205.0 316 312 269 11.81
8.5968 2 Coalinga 24 24 208.1 296 233 199 8.60
6.403846153846154 3 Taft 24 24 208.0 261 176 148 6.40
5.408450704225352 4 Merced 24 24 213.0 216 136 128 5.41
4.647887323943662 5 Sequoias 24 24 213.0 236 134 110 4.65
4.098591549295775 6 Reedley 24 24 213.0 205 128 97 4.10
3.796875 7 Fresno City 24 24 213.1 224 110 90 3.80
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
11.809756097560976 1 Porterville 24 24 150 6.59 21 2.37
8.5968 2 Coalinga 24 24 160 6.91 11 2.01
4.647887323943662 3 Sequoias 24 24 149 6.30 11 1.62
6.403846153846154 4 Taft 24 24 175 7.57 13 1.72
4.098591549295775 5 Reedley 24 24 166 7.01 14 1.46
5.408450704225352 6 Merced 24 24 152 6.42 20 1.47
3.796875 7 Fresno City 24 24 204 8.61 2 1.33
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
5.408450704225352 1 Merced 24 940 639 269 32 14 .966
3.796875 2 Fresno City 24 945 639 265 41 12 .957
4.647887323943662 3 Sequoias 24 928 639 260 29 8 .969
4.098591549295775 4 Reedley 24 933 639 254 40 14 .957
6.403846153846154 5 Taft 24 917 624 257 36 8 .961
11.809756097560976 6 Porterville 24 873 615 192 66 20 .924
8.5968 7 Coalinga 24 917 627 219 71 15 .923
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
4.647887323943662 1 Sequoias 24 17 15 9 .375 0
6.403846153846154 2 Taft 24 10 27 7 .206 0
8.5968 3 Coalinga 24 6 22 14 .389 0
3.796875 4 Fresno City 24 20 26 10 .278 0
4.098591549295775 5 Reedley 24 7 16 6 .273 1
5.408450704225352 6 Merced 24 10 20 6 .231 0
11.809756097560976 7 Porterville 24 5 65 9 .122 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
4.098591549295775 1 Reedley 12 1,177 99
6.403846153846154 2 Taft 12 750 63
3.796875 3 Fresno City 12 0 0
4.647887323943662 4 Sequoias 12 0 0
5.408450704225352 5 Merced 12 0 0
8.5968 6 Coalinga 12 0 0
11.809756097560976 7 Porterville 12 0 0