California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
267.0 1	Fresno City	46	1635	494	348	267	341	.302	.416	.454
211.0 2	Merced	43	1532	443	293	211	310	.289	.392	.386
200.0 3	Reedley	46	1666	522	329	200	314	.313	.398	.444
178.0 4	Porterville	40	1378	361	176	178	315	.262	.367	.329
174.0 5	Sequoias	41	1447	400	214	174	300	.276	.374	.367
167.0 6	Taft	40	1366	366	200	167	279	.268	.366	.372
143.0 7	Coalinga	37	1315	384	216	143	299	.292	.383	.384

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
267.0 1	Fresno City	46	94	8	46	148
200.0 2	Reedley	46	104	18	26	148
211.0 3	Merced	43	67	12	19	98
174.0 4	Sequoias	41	78	7	13	98
167.0 5	Taft	40	63	8	21	92
143.0 6	Coalinga	37	60	8	15	83
178.0 7	Porterville	40	65	5	6	76

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
267.0 1	Fresno City	46	395	742	49	16
200.0 2	Reedley	46	383	740	28	8
211.0 3	Merced	43	348	591	51	8
174.0 4	Sequoias	41	250	531	23	17
143.0 5	Coalinga	37	242	505	77	22
167.0 6	Taft	40	229	508	67	24
178.0 7	Porterville	40	205	454	25	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
267.0 1	Fresno City	46	74	32	15	21	275	276	1.00	2023
200.0 2	Reedley	46	55	29	34	16	392	384	1.02	1984
211.0 3	Merced	43	63	21	42	9	404	344	1.17	1869
174.0 4	Sequoias	41	57	11	18	23	372	320	1.16	1707
178.0 5	Porterville	40	60	14	11	25	333	334	1.00	1641
167.0 6	Taft	40	54	16	21	24	338	355	.95	1624
143.0 7	Coalinga	37	63	21	16	7	329	267	1.23	1558

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
178.0 1	Porterville	40	40	336.0	478	501	418	11.20
143.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	325.0	436	340	287	7.95
167.0 3	Taft	40	40	350.0	433	294	245	6.30
211.0 4	Merced	43	43	387.0	402	264	251	5.84
174.0 5	Sequoias	41	41	364.1	449	272	220	5.43
200.0 6	Reedley	46	46	409.1	418	280	214	4.71
267.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	411.1	427	225	189	4.14

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
178.0 1	Porterville	40	40	258	6.91	27	2.39
143.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	273	7.56	13	1.90
174.0 3	Sequoias	41	41	255	6.30	15	1.74
167.0 4	Taft	40	40	269	6.92	23	1.74
200.0 5	Reedley	46	46	351	7.72	28	1.59
211.0 6	Merced	43	43	276	6.42	26	1.51
267.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	387	8.47	14	1.34

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
211.0 1	Merced	43	1699	1162	476	61	26	.964
267.0 2	Fresno City	46	1769	1230	473	66	17	.963
174.0 3	Sequoias	41	1581	1092	429	60	18	.962
200.0 4	Reedley	46	1762	1228	458	76	26	.957
167.0 5	Taft	40	1550	1050	433	67	13	.957
178.0 6	Porterville	40	1451	1006	330	115	36	.921
143.0 7	Coalinga	37	1411	978	321	112	26	.921

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
174.0 1	Sequoias	41	36	37	16	.302	0
167.0 2	Taft	40	21	46	19	.292	1
143.0 3	Coalinga	37	6	40	16	.286	3
267.0 4	Fresno City	46	39	42	14	.250	0
200.0 5	Reedley	46	24	38	10	.208	1
211.0 6	Merced	43	15	44	11	.200	2
178.0 7	Porterville	40	13	93	15	.139	2

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
200.0 1	Reedley	25	2,626	106
167.0 2	Taft	21	1,225	59
267.0 3	Fresno City	23	0	0
211.0 4	Merced	19	0	0
178.0 5	Porterville	19	0	0
174.0 6	Sequoias	24	0	0
143.0 7	Coalinga	21	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
150.0 1	Fresno City	24	858	274	201	150	165	.319	.434	.498
126.0 2	Merced	24	867	268	200	126	162	.309	.410	.416
95.0 3	Reedley	24	866	257	156	95	154	.297	.381	.411
100.0 4	Porterville	24	817	197	82	100	194	.241	.343	.308
101.0 5	Sequoias	24	843	234	127	101	149	.278	.374	.380
94.0 6	Taft	24	849	250	140	94	152	.294	.378	.412
93.0 7	Coalinga	24	871	274	162	93	180	.315	.399	.418

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
150.0 1	Fresno City	24	58	7	27	92
95.0 2	Reedley	24	43	13	10	66
126.0 3	Merced	24	39	9	12	60
101.0 4	Sequoias	24	44	6	10	60
94.0 5	Taft	24	49	3	15	67
93.0 6	Coalinga	24	41	5	13	59
100.0 7	Porterville	24	38	1	5	44

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
150.0 1	Fresno City	24	227	427	29	9
95.0 2	Reedley	24	183	356	15	4
126.0 3	Merced	24	229	361	33	6
101.0 4	Sequoias	24	153	320	15	12
93.0 5	Coalinga	24	181	364	45	11
94.0 6	Taft	24	156	350	40	18
100.0 7	Porterville	24	100	252	14	5

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
150.0 1	Fresno City	24	39	20	10	11	132	127	1.04	1077
95.0 2	Reedley	24	30	11	16	6	204	212	.96	1018
126.0 3	Merced	24	32	14	22	3	216	186	1.16	1061
101.0 4	Sequoias	24	33	7	10	9	220	197	1.12	994
100.0 5	Porterville	24	31	8	6	13	204	196	1.04	962
94.0 6	Taft	24	28	12	9	8	200	224	.89	992
93.0 7	Coalinga	24	40	16	14	6	214	172	1.24	1034

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
100.0 1	Porterville	24	24	205.0	316	312	269	11.81
93.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	208.1	296	233	199	8.60
94.0 3	Taft	24	24	208.0	261	176	148	6.40
126.0 4	Merced	24	24	213.0	216	136	128	5.41
101.0 5	Sequoias	24	24	213.0	236	134	110	4.65
95.0 6	Reedley	24	24	213.0	205	128	97	4.10
150.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	213.1	224	110	90	3.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
100.0 1	Porterville	24	24	150	6.59	21	2.37
93.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	160	6.91	11	2.01
101.0 3	Sequoias	24	24	149	6.30	11	1.62
94.0 4	Taft	24	24	175	7.57	13	1.72
95.0 5	Reedley	24	24	166	7.01	14	1.46
126.0 6	Merced	24	24	152	6.42	20	1.47
150.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	204	8.61	2	1.33

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
126.0 1	Merced	24	940	639	269	32	14	.966
150.0 2	Fresno City	24	945	639	265	41	12	.957
101.0 3	Sequoias	24	928	639	260	29	8	.969
95.0 4	Reedley	24	933	639	254	40	14	.957
94.0 5	Taft	24	917	624	257	36	8	.961
100.0 6	Porterville	24	873	615	192	66	20	.924
93.0 7	Coalinga	24	917	627	219	71	15	.923

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
101.0 1	Sequoias	24	17	15	9	.375	0
94.0 2	Taft	24	10	27	7	.206	0
93.0 3	Coalinga	24	6	22	14	.389	0
150.0 4	Fresno City	24	20	26	10	.278	0
95.0 5	Reedley	24	7	16	6	.273	1
126.0 6	Merced	24	10	20	6	.231	0
100.0 7	Porterville	24	5	65	9	.122	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
95.0 1	Reedley	12	1,177	99
94.0 2	Taft	12	750	63
150.0 3	Fresno City	12	0	0
126.0 4	Merced	12	0	0
100.0 5	Porterville	12	0	0
101.0 6	Sequoias	12	0	0
93.0 7	Coalinga	12	0	0