California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	1722	558	373	230	258	.324	.415	.477
1536.0 2	Palomar	42	1536	509	319	157	214	.331	.409	.456
1458.0 3	Southwestern	43	1458	401	184	162	252	.275	.359	.343
1354.0 4	Desert	40	1354	328	144	139	327	.242	.331	.309
1332.0 5	San Bernardino	39	1332	343	163	147	281	.258	.347	.338
1326.0 6	San Diego Mesa	38	1326	394	216	127	245	.297	.377	.418
1301.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	38	1301	321	141	110	278	.247	.322	.327
1245.0 8	San Diego City	36	1245	336	168	112	246	.270	.343	.349
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	1174	243	71	100	317	.207	.283	.239

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	112	16	40	168
1536.0 2	Palomar	42	99	16	20	135
1326.0 3	San Diego Mesa	38	84	11	18	113
1332.0 4	San Bernardino	39	60	10	9	79
1301.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	38	62	8	9	79
1458.0 6	Southwestern	43	61	13	4	78
1354.0 7	Desert	40	61	12	2	75
1245.0 8	San Diego City	36	44	18	6	68
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	32	3	-	35

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	416	822	77	30
1536.0 2	Palomar	42	369	700	34	15
1326.0 3	San Diego Mesa	38	238	554	30	17
1458.0 4	Southwestern	43	222	500	61	20
1245.0 5	San Diego City	36	208	434	56	21
1332.0 6	San Bernardino	39	186	450	40	19
1354.0 7	Desert	40	175	419	27	20
1301.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	38	172	426	10	4
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	87	281	17	14

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	51	20	17	36	429	447	.96	2040
1536.0 2	Palomar	42	63	25	52	25	455	379	1.20	1833
1458.0 3	Southwestern	43	38	17	30	32	405	374	1.08	1705
1354.0 4	Desert	40	48	13	28	29	349	339	1.03	1582
1326.0 5	San Diego Mesa	38	50	12	41	25	324	366	.89	1556
1332.0 6	San Bernardino	39	41	10	18	27	365	322	1.13	1548
1301.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	38	37	5	24	29	320	326	.98	1477
1245.0 8	San Diego City	36	36	17	17	20	329	324	1.02	1427
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	26	3	12	26	328	232	1.41	1315

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
1174.0 1	Imperial Valley	39	39	305.1	497	422	350	10.32
1301.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	38	38	326.2	457	335	256	7.05
1354.0 3	Desert	40	40	347.2	466	357	271	7.02
1332.0 4	San Bernardino	39	39	340.1	400	261	198	5.24
1326.0 5	San Diego Mesa	38	38	331.2	397	253	182	4.94
1458.0 6	Southwestern	43	43	383.1	356	197	170	3.99
1245.0 7	San Diego City	36	36	320.2	338	202	141	3.96
1722.0 8	Grossmont	47	47	420.0	359	171	139	2.98
1536.0 9	Palomar	42	42	375.0	343	178	122	2.93

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	47	347	7.44	12	-
1536.0 2	Palomar	42	42	285	6.84	18	-
1458.0 3	Southwestern	43	43	272	6.39	12	-
1354.0 4	Desert	40	40	229	5.93	20	-
1332.0 5	San Bernardino	39	39	261	6.90	9	-
1326.0 6	San Diego Mesa	38	38	243	6.59	12	-
1301.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	38	38	208	5.73	9	-
1245.0 8	San Diego City	36	36	244	6.85	10	-
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	39	142	4.19	21	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	1800	1260	489	51	15	.972
1458.0 2	Southwestern	43	1598	1123	424	51	10	.968
1536.0 3	Palomar	42	1657	1125	469	63	10	.962
1245.0 4	San Diego City	36	1402	962	379	61	7	.956
1326.0 5	San Diego Mesa	38	1474	995	403	76	25	.948
1354.0 6	Desert	40	1518	1043	393	82	18	.946
1332.0 7	San Bernardino	39	1521	1021	414	86	8	.943
1301.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	38	1403	926	393	84	13	.940
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	39	1361	861	407	93	19	.932

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
1722.0 1	Grossmont	47	35	28	25	.472	-
1174.0 2	Imperial Valley	39	28	44	29	.397	1
1245.0 3	San Diego City	36	33	28	16	.364	1
1536.0 4	Palomar	42	25	32	17	.347	1
1326.0 5	San Diego Mesa	38	24	39	17	.304	2
1458.0 6	Southwestern	43	25	42	18	.300	-
1301.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	38	21	87	23	.209	1
1354.0 8	Desert	40	30	75	15	.167	-
1332.0 9	San Bernardino	39	36	65	11	.145	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
1536.0 1	Palomar	19	2,287	121
1245.0 2	San Diego City	19	1,513	80
1354.0 3	Desert	20	1,560	78
1301.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	19	1,007	53
1332.0 5	San Bernardino	17	666	39
1458.0 6	Southwestern	22	186	8
1722.0 7	Grossmont	21	104	5
1326.0 8	San Diego Mesa	17	67	4
1174.0 9	Imperial Valley	15	20	1

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	908	318	216	126	114	.350	.444	.510
888.0 2	Palomar	24	888	317	224	94	107	.357	.432	.498
819.0 3	Southwestern	24	819	228	101	92	136	.278	.361	.348
824.0 4	Desert	24	824	216	94	79	176	.262	.346	.331
833.0 5	San Bernardino	24	833	234	117	89	146	.281	.366	.366
850.0 6	San Diego Mesa	24	850	262	147	85	152	.308	.388	.435
820.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	820	197	90	69	173	.240	.319	.327
822.0 8	San Diego City	24	822	222	110	68	152	.270	.339	.337
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	766	143	34	57	233	.187	.256	.217

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	64	9	21	94
888.0 2	Palomar	24	64	11	13	88
850.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	60	6	12	78
833.0 4	San Bernardino	24	40	5	7	52
820.0 5	Mt. San Jacinto	24	33	7	8	48
819.0 6	Southwestern	24	34	7	3	44
824.0 7	Desert	24	42	6	1	49
822.0 8	San Diego City	24	26	10	3	39
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	19	2	-	21

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	243	463	55	17
888.0 2	Palomar	24	252	442	21	9
850.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	163	370	20	11
819.0 4	Southwestern	24	117	285	37	14
822.0 5	San Diego City	24	141	277	43	16
833.0 6	San Bernardino	24	129	305	29	13
824.0 7	Desert	24	115	273	19	13
820.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	24	107	268	3	2
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	41	166	10	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	32	7	4	22	206	239	.86	1077
888.0 2	Palomar	24	36	16	35	15	272	210	1.30	1069
819.0 3	Southwestern	24	21	12	16	19	229	227	1.01	960
824.0 4	Desert	24	32	9	19	19	219	212	1.03	963
850.0 5	San Diego Mesa	24	31	8	26	16	207	232	.89	1000
833.0 6	San Bernardino	24	27	7	10	20	228	215	1.06	966
820.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	27	3	12	18	193	205	.94	931
822.0 8	San Diego City	24	23	11	12	10	219	223	.98	936
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	15	2	5	16	198	139	1.42	845

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
766.0 1	Imperial Valley	24	24	205.0	324	264	213	9.35
820.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	24	24	206.2	286	200	150	6.53
824.0 3	Desert	24	24	209.0	284	199	142	6.11
833.0 4	San Bernardino	24	24	212.2	228	120	96	4.06
850.0 5	San Diego Mesa	24	24	210.2	245	137	103	4.40
819.0 6	Southwestern	24	24	214.1	198	95	84	3.53
822.0 7	San Diego City	24	24	209.2	221	123	91	3.91
908.0 8	Grossmont	24	24	214.0	161	69	53	2.23
888.0 9	Palomar	24	24	214.0	190	100	57	2.40

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	24	197	8.29	3	-
888.0 2	Palomar	24	24	166	6.98	12	-
819.0 3	Southwestern	24	24	168	7.05	7	-
824.0 4	Desert	24	24	135	5.81	10	-
833.0 5	San Bernardino	24	24	164	6.94	5	-
850.0 6	San Diego Mesa	24	24	162	6.92	7	-
820.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	24	136	5.92	7	-
822.0 8	San Diego City	24	24	170	7.30	5	-
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	24	92	4.04	12	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	887	642	224	21	9	.976
819.0 2	Southwestern	24	917	643	253	21	6	.977
888.0 3	Palomar	24	959	642	271	46	6	.952
822.0 4	San Diego City	24	900	629	230	41	4	.954
850.0 5	San Diego Mesa	24	923	632	254	37	17	.960
824.0 6	Desert	24	923	627	246	50	9	.946
833.0 7	San Bernardino	24	936	638	261	37	4	.960
820.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	24	827	566	212	49	7	.941
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	874	560	250	64	11	.927

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
908.0 1	Grossmont	24	15	12	9	.429	-
766.0 2	Imperial Valley	24	14	27	15	.357	1
822.0 3	San Diego City	24	22	18	9	.333	1
888.0 4	Palomar	24	15	11	10	.476	1
850.0 5	San Diego Mesa	24	16	22	10	.313	2
819.0 6	Southwestern	24	16	25	9	.265	-
820.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	12	48	8	.143	1
824.0 8	Desert	24	22	39	12	.235	-
833.0 9	San Bernardino	24	23	35	8	.186	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
888.0 1	Palomar	12	1,342	112
822.0 2	San Diego City	12	1,008	84
824.0 3	Desert	12	936	78
820.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	12	576	48
833.0 5	San Bernardino	12	335	28
819.0 6	Southwestern	12	86	7
908.0 7	Grossmont	12	104	9
850.0 8	San Diego Mesa	12	67	6
766.0 9	Imperial Valley	12	20	2