Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3227808814400993 1 Fresno City 43 1611 520 387 236 97 16 33 146 322 .323 .432 .464 85 17 14 32 258 308 .84 1963
0.3100929614873838 2 Reedley 42 1506 467 283 240 77 13 16 106 271 .310 .423 .410 71 22 20 23 391 347 1.13 1859
0.29632248939179634 3 Taft 40 1414 419 267 224 66 9 27 102 303 .296 .416 .413 77 16 24 27 322 317 1.02 1755
0.2925824175824176 4 Sequoias 40 1456 426 231 152 79 8 19 106 280 .293 .377 .397 53 11 15 39 381 319 1.19 1687
0.25875625446747674 5 Merced 41 1399 362 221 160 62 10 25 97 311 .259 .361 .371 70 10 34 30 395 297 1.33 1673
0.25605282465150403 6 Porterville 40 1363 349 208 178 64 7 10 81 347 .256 .365 .335 64 13 23 19 276 360 .77 1641
0.25 7 Coalinga 36 1168 292 154 157 56 11 5 72 259 .250 .361 .330 53 12 14 38 316 264 1.20 1404
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
433.0 1 Fresno City 43 433 748 47 22
341.0 2 Reedley 42 341 618 48 11
308.0 3 Taft 40 308 584 65 30
267.0 4 Merced 41 267 519 57 13
258.0 5 Sequoias 40 258 578 20 10
230.0 6 Porterville 40 230 457 40 11
172.0 7 Coalinga 36 172 385 74 19
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
5.455242966751918 1 Fresno City 5.46 31 12 43 43 9 391.0 410 270 237 171 413 9.51 14 1.49 1815 58 63
5.804878048780488 2 Reedley 5.80 24 18 42 42 9 369.0 376 294 238 254 378 9.22 26 1.71 1774 41 45
5.921933085501859 3 Merced 5.92 20 20 41 41 10 358.2 370 267 236 202 313 7.85 26 1.59 1682 34 67
7.490159325210871 4 Sequoias 7.49 18 22 40 40 10 355.2 485 331 296 190 231 5.85 36 1.90 1749 45 38
7.659754948162111 5 Taft 7.66 20 20 40 40 6 353.2 487 363 301 173 274 6.97 27 1.87 1780 65 67
8.048571428571428 6 Porterville 8.05 17 22 40 40 7 350.0 421 341 313 265 266 6.84 18 1.96 1806 52 91
9.10843373493976 7 Coalinga 9.11 2 32 36 36 0 304.1 417 348 308 182 182 5.38 22 1.97 1597 30 85
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9708798017348204 1 Fresno City 43 1614 1165 402 47 31 .971 31 50 6 .107 1
0.9690522243713733 2 Merced 41 1551 1076 427 48 16 .969 36 43 13 .232 0
0.9601063829787234 3 Sequoias 40 1504 1067 377 60 7 .960 27 28 26 .481 0
0.9533980582524272 4 Taft 40 1545 1054 419 72 25 .953 33 52 8 .133 0
0.9455022980958634 5 Porterville 40 1523 1048 392 83 76 .946 26 115 10 .080 0
0.9450410612760581 6 Reedley 42 1583 1107 389 87 19 .945 21 29 18 .383 3
0.9243636363636364 7 Coalinga 36 1375 909 362 104 29 .924 32 43 18 .295 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
86.0 1 Reedley 20 1,712 86
61.0 2 Taft 18 1,085 61
0.0 3 Coalinga 17 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 21 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 15 0 0
0.0 3 Porterville 21 0 0
0.0 3 Sequoias 25 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3517534537725824 1 Fresno City 24 941 331 259 154 56 12 21 89 159 .352 .460 .504 48 16 7 19 125 174 .72 1166
0.3115124153498871 2 Reedley 24 886 276 161 143 50 8 6 64 153 .312 .423 .406 39 15 10 17 221 211 1.05 1093
0.3044496487119438 3 Taft 24 854 260 175 133 42 5 22 69 170 .304 .418 .443 41 10 14 18 182 197 .92 1052
0.30293159609120524 4 Sequoias 24 921 279 146 87 55 5 12 72 154 .303 .376 .413 24 5 9 23 252 202 1.25 1046
0.29093050647820967 5 Merced 24 849 247 163 98 48 6 19 73 175 .291 .388 .429 41 6 23 21 213 184 1.16 1017
0.2575210589651023 6 Porterville 24 831 214 118 99 36 4 5 45 205 .258 .357 .329 33 7 18 14 176 216 .81 988
0.26362484157160965 7 Coalinga 24 789 208 116 105 39 10 5 54 169 .264 .374 .357 38 6 12 27 211 171 1.23 950
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
291.0 1 Fresno City 24 291 474 29 13
198.0 2 Reedley 24 198 360 27 4
196.0 3 Taft 24 196 378 30 17
199.0 4 Merced 24 199 364 38 8
162.0 5 Sequoias 24 162 380 13 5
131.0 6 Porterville 24 131 273 15 8
128.0 7 Coalinga 24 128 282 42 16
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
4.767123287671232 1 Fresno City 4.77 18 6 24 24 4 219.0 229 141 116 91 224 9.21 6 1.46 1005 26 32
5.291666666666666 2 Reedley 5.29 13 11 24 24 5 216.0 220 171 127 146 201 8.38 11 1.69 1036 25 22
4.486024844720497 3 Merced 4.49 16 7 24 24 8 214.2 198 121 107 107 197 8.26 12 1.42 958 15 35
7.761978361669243 4 Sequoias 7.76 11 13 24 24 7 215.2 318 202 186 99 148 6.18 17 1.93 1063 26 25
6.708074534161492 5 Taft 6.71 14 10 24 24 5 214.2 287 194 160 96 149 6.25 14 1.78 1057 40 40
7.89622641509434 6 Porterville 7.90 10 14 24 24 3 212.0 256 202 186 148 150 6.37 10 1.91 1085 34 56
10.536585365853657 7 Coalinga 10.54 1 22 24 24 0 205.0 304 274 240 132 117 5.14 20 2.13 1117 22 52
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9722222222222222 1 Fresno City 24 936 660 250 26 22 .972 21 28 3 .097 1
0.9739696312364425 2 Merced 24 922 644 254 24 6 .974 23 12 9 .429 0
0.9646302250803859 3 Sequoias 24 933 647 253 33 4 .965 16 18 14 .438 0
0.9518828451882845 4 Taft 24 956 637 273 46 13 .952 26 33 4 .108 0
0.9471413160733549 5 Porterville 24 927 635 243 49 44 .947 17 67 6 .082 0
0.9345794392523364 6 Reedley 24 963 648 252 63 17 .935 13 13 11 .458 3
0.9182115594329335 7 Coalinga 24 917 611 231 75 17 .918 23 23 11 .324 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
86.0 1 Reedley 12 1,027 86
60.0 2 Taft 12 710 60
0.0 3 Coalinga 12 0 0
0.0 3 Fresno City 12 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 12 0 0
0.0 3 Porterville 12 0 0
0.0 3 Sequoias 12 0 0