Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
16.160869565217393 1 Taft 33 115 1387 12.06 464 3785 .244 1295 11.26 1858.5 16.2
15.46694214876033 2 Sequoias 34 121 1325 10.95 542 3716 .211 1170 9.67 1871.5 15.5
14.811224489795919 3 Coalinga 27 98 1108 11.31 656 3347 .135 1017 10.38 1451.5 14.8
12.75233644859813 4 Lemoore 30 107 1028 9.61 629 3848 .104 937 8.76 1364.5 12.8
7.303571428571429 5 Porterville 26 84 454 5.40 417 2153 .017 402 4.79 613.5 7.3
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
2225.0 1 Sequoias 34 121 2225 18.39 97 449 322 2.66
1950.0 2 Taft 33 115 1950 16.96 61 291 207 1.80
1799.0 3 Lemoore 30 107 1799 16.81 45 115 103 0.96
1497.0 4 Coalinga 27 98 1497 15.28 37 111 93 0.94
1028.0 5 Porterville 26 84 1028 12.24 26 77 65 0.77
Rk Team m s ta sa sa/s se r re
2.561224489795918 1 Coalinga 27 98 148 251 2.56 230 396 125
2.3043478260869565 2 Taft 33 115 231 265 2.30 207 1855 144
2.1869158878504673 3 Lemoore 30 107 0 234 2.19 218 1123 182
1.859504132231405 4 Sequoias 34 121 131 225 1.86 220 1988 181
1.130952380952381 5 Porterville 26 84 0 95 1.13 184 1512 248
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
16.24 1 Taft 8 25 305 12.20 87 737 .296 287 11.48 406.0 16.2
15.520833333333334 2 Sequoias 8 24 278 11.58 112 712 .233 239 9.96 372.5 15.5
14.568965517241379 3 Coalinga 8 29 335 11.55 203 1000 .132 300 10.34 422.5 14.6
12.0 4 Lemoore 8 28 252 9.00 162 952 .095 223 7.96 336.0 12.0
6.125 5 Porterville 8 24 108 4.50 133 590 -.042 95 3.96 147.0 6.1
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
407.0 1 Sequoias 8 24 407 16.96 11 91 57 2.35
416.0 2 Taft 8 25 416 16.64 13 62 44 1.76
433.0 3 Lemoore 8 28 433 15.46 11 34 28 1.00
425.0 4 Coalinga 8 29 425 14.66 14 23 26 0.88
284.0 5 Porterville 8 24 284 11.83 5 20 15 0.63
Rk Team m s ta sa sa/s se r re
2.1379310344827585 1 Coalinga 8 29 0 62 2.14 73 0 41
2.28 2 Taft 8 25 0 57 2.28 49 371 27
2.0 3 Lemoore 8 28 0 56 2.00 50 59 52
1.5833333333333333 4 Sequoias 8 24 0 38 1.58 36 350 29
1.0 5 Porterville 8 24 0 24 1.00 29 441 59