California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
0.3177931034482759 1	Fresno City	34	116	1649	14.22	497	3625	.318	1518	13.09	2137.0	18.4
0.24056423942051086 2	Sequoias	28	94	1000	10.64	369	2623	.241	869	9.24	1346.0	14.3
0.22804054054054054 3	Coalinga	26	91	980	10.77	440	2368	.228	978	10.75	1303.5	14.3
0.16865552903739062 4	Columbia	18	61	371	6.08	159	1257	.169	362	5.93	572.0	9.4
0.14806110458284372 5	Merced	20	74	700	9.46	322	2553	.148	588	7.95	956.5	12.9
0.14731653888280394 6	Lemoore	20	67	515	7.69	246	1826	.147	514	7.67	765.0	11.4
0.11560328490208464 7	Taft	28	103	810	7.86	444	3166	.116	733	7.12	1054.0	10.2
0.1132952108649035 8	Porterville	27	98	845	8.62	528	2798	.113	774	7.90	1177.0	12.0
0.0864461045891142 9	Reedley	19	64	258	4.03	177	937	.086	226	3.53	353.5	5.5

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
0.3177931034482759 1	Fresno City	34	116	1914	16.50	71	236	189	1.63
0.22804054054054054 2	Coalinga	26	91	1545	16.98	30	133	97	1.06
0.11560328490208464 3	Taft	28	103	1513	14.69	82	116	140	1.36
0.14731653888280394 4	Lemoore	20	67	1296	19.34	108	36	126	1.88
0.24056423942051086 5	Sequoias	28	94	1148	12.21	111	84	153	1.63
0.1132952108649035 6	Porterville	27	98	1075	10.97	67	170	152	1.55
0.14806110458284372 7	Merced	20	74	881	11.91	37	69	72	0.97
0.0864461045891142 8	Reedley	19	64	475	7.42	35	7	39	0.60
0.16865552903739062 9	Columbia	18	61	463	7.59	115	12	121	1.98

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
0.3177931034482759 1	Fresno City	34	116	299	2.58	1696	166
0.14806110458284372 2	Merced	20	74	185	2.50	0	0
0.22804054054054054 3	Coalinga	26	91	227	2.49	16	3
0.24056423942051086 4	Sequoias	28	94	193	2.05	1506	185
0.14731653888280394 5	Lemoore	20	67	124	1.85	0	0
0.1132952108649035 6	Porterville	27	98	180	1.84	18	0
0.16865552903739062 7	Columbia	18	61	80	1.31	550	38
0.11560328490208464 8	Taft	28	103	104	1.01	1878	221
0.0864461045891142 9	Reedley	19	64	57	0.89	814	139

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
0.3834080717488789 1	Fresno City	16	48	686	14.29	173	1338	.383	627	13.06	919.0	19.1
0.2634048257372654 2	Sequoias	16	52	610	11.73	217	1492	.263	510	9.81	809.0	15.6
0.2357100766057749 3	Coalinga	16	55	647	11.76	247	1697	.236	645	11.73	865.0	15.7
0.1651705565529623 4	Columbia	16	55	323	5.87	139	1114	.165	314	5.71	508.0	9.2
0.1430738119312437 5	Merced	16	58	542	9.34	259	1978	.143	463	7.98	734.0	12.7
0.146606914212548 6	Lemoore	16	54	428	7.93	199	1562	.147	428	7.93	637.0	11.8
0.13581661891117477 7	Taft	16	57	456	8.00	219	1745	.136	403	7.07	608.5	10.7
0.10153358011634056 8	Porterville	16	61	548	8.98	356	1891	.102	518	8.49	750.5	12.3
0.11771300448430494 9	Reedley	16	54	251	4.65	146	892	.118	215	3.98	343.5	6.4

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
0.3834080717488789 1	Fresno City	16	48	792	16.50	29	106	82	1.71
0.2357100766057749 2	Coalinga	16	55	1016	18.47	23	94	70	1.27
0.13581661891117477 3	Taft	16	57	904	15.86	53	83	95	1.66
0.146606914212548 4	Lemoore	16	54	1068	19.78	85	26	98	1.81
0.2634048257372654 5	Sequoias	16	52	642	12.35	69	38	88	1.69
0.10153358011634056 6	Porterville	16	61	715	11.72	25	141	96	1.57
0.1430738119312437 7	Merced	16	58	685	11.81	31	50	56	0.97
0.11771300448430494 8	Reedley	16	54	452	8.37	33	7	37	0.68
0.1651705565529623 9	Columbia	16	55	396	7.20	103	12	109	1.98

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
0.3834080717488789 1	Fresno City	16	48	151	3.15	544	51
0.1430738119312437 2	Merced	16	58	136	2.34	0	0
0.2357100766057749 3	Coalinga	16	55	148	2.69	12	3
0.2634048257372654 4	Sequoias	16	52	111	2.13	811	81
0.146606914212548 5	Lemoore	16	54	111	2.06	0	0
0.10153358011634056 6	Porterville	16	61	107	1.75	18	0
0.1651705565529623 7	Columbia	16	55	76	1.38	550	38
0.13581661891117477 8	Taft	16	57	58	1.02	987	104
0.11771300448430494 9	Reedley	16	54	56	1.04	757	129