Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
17.767543859649123 1 Fresno City 33 114 1528 13.40 586 3725 .253 1415 12.41 2025.5 17.8
14.453333333333333 2 Merced 22 75 792 10.56 413 2194 .173 697 9.29 1084.0 14.5
14.017045454545455 3 Cerro Coso 24 88 904 10.27 424 2918 .164 842 9.57 1233.5 14.0
13.727272727272727 4 Columbia 24 88 1004 11.41 389 2068 .297 992 11.27 1208.0 13.7
13.533980582524272 5 Sequoias 30 103 997 9.68 402 3113 .191 917 8.90 1394.0 13.5
12.99390243902439 6 Coalinga 23 82 790 9.63 387 2526 .160 785 9.57 1065.5 13.0
12.638157894736842 7 Reedley 23 76 700 9.21 486 2381 .090 638 8.39 960.5 12.6
11.341346153846153 8 Taft 28 104 865 8.32 384 3487 .138 820 7.88 1179.5 11.3
8.905063291139241 9 Porterville 23 79 510 6.46 310 1295 .154 438 5.54 703.5 8.9
5.925373134328358 10 Lemoore 21 67 260 3.88 241 1398 .014 228 3.40 397.0 5.9
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
2043.0 1 Fresno City 33 114 2043 17.92 80 243 202 1.77
1650.0 2 Taft 28 104 1650 15.87 88 113 145 1.39
1455.0 3 Cerro Coso 24 88 1455 16.53 44 159 124 1.40
1427.0 4 Sequoias 30 103 1427 13.85 138 54 165 1.60
1286.0 5 Coalinga 23 82 1286 15.68 41 95 89 1.08
1186.0 6 Lemoore 21 67 1186 17.70 17 14 24 0.36
1082.0 7 Reedley 23 76 1082 14.24 70 73 107 1.40
977.0 8 Merced 22 75 977 13.03 70 96 118 1.57
943.0 9 Columbia 24 88 943 10.72 124 6 127 1.44
547.0 10 Porterville 23 79 547 6.92 51 33 68 0.85
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
2.5964912280701755 1 Fresno City 33 114 296 2.60 1642 143
2.340909090909091 2 Cerro Coso 24 88 206 2.34 1499 187
2.32 3 Merced 22 75 174 2.32 0 0
2.2804878048780486 4 Coalinga 23 82 187 2.28 0 44
2.2524271844660193 5 Sequoias 30 103 232 2.25 1698 182
2.026315789473684 6 Reedley 23 76 154 2.03 36 182
1.6865671641791045 7 Lemoore 21 67 113 1.69 0 0
1.6346153846153846 8 Taft 28 104 170 1.63 1675 76
1.5949367088607596 9 Porterville 23 79 126 1.59 0 0
0.875 10 Columbia 24 88 77 0.88 0 14
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
18.30701754385965 1 Fresno City 18 57 770 13.51 263 1724 .294 721 12.65 1043.5 18.3
15.30327868852459 2 Merced 18 61 684 11.21 349 1883 .178 601 9.85 933.5 15.3
13.926470588235293 3 Cerro Coso 18 68 701 10.31 317 2265 .170 658 9.68 947.0 13.9
14.363636363636363 4 Columbia 18 66 804 12.18 327 1589 .300 795 12.05 948.0 14.4
13.991935483870968 5 Sequoias 18 62 621 10.02 234 1885 .205 574 9.26 867.5 14.0
12.9921875 6 Coalinga 18 64 626 9.78 292 1999 .167 622 9.72 831.5 13.0
12.216666666666667 7 Reedley 18 60 546 9.10 382 1888 .087 500 8.33 733.0 12.2
12.007246376811594 8 Taft 18 69 597 8.65 261 2240 .150 577 8.36 828.5 12.0
8.720338983050848 9 Porterville 18 59 377 6.39 237 980 .143 327 5.54 514.5 8.7
5.775862068965517 10 Lemoore 18 58 230 3.97 219 1274 .009 202 3.48 335.0 5.8
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
1071.0 1 Fresno City 18 57 1071 18.79 30 111 86 1.50
1180.0 2 Taft 18 69 1180 17.10 64 89 109 1.57
1125.0 3 Cerro Coso 18 68 1125 16.54 28 130 93 1.37
906.0 4 Sequoias 18 62 906 14.61 91 37 110 1.77
1031.0 5 Coalinga 18 64 1031 16.11 31 63 63 0.98
1082.0 6 Lemoore 18 58 1082 18.66 15 14 22 0.38
829.0 7 Reedley 18 60 829 13.82 44 64 76 1.27
860.0 8 Merced 18 61 860 14.10 59 87 103 1.68
681.0 9 Columbia 18 66 681 10.32 89 0 89 1.35
426.0 10 Porterville 18 59 426 7.22 34 29 49 0.82
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
3.2982456140350878 1 Fresno City 18 57 188 3.30 717 50
2.25 2 Cerro Coso 18 68 153 2.25 1171 145
2.4098360655737703 3 Merced 18 61 147 2.41 0 0
2.234375 4 Coalinga 18 64 143 2.23 0 27
2.2096774193548385 5 Sequoias 18 62 137 2.21 958 86
1.85 6 Reedley 18 60 111 1.85 0 115
1.4310344827586208 7 Lemoore 18 58 83 1.43 0 0
1.7826086956521738 8 Taft 18 69 123 1.78 1072 45
1.5084745762711864 9 Porterville 18 59 89 1.51 0 0
0.8333333333333334 10 Columbia 18 66 55 0.83 0 2