California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
1.5718015665796345 1	Columbia	24	89	657	7.38	55	383	1.572	573	6.44	873.0	9.8
0.21793103448275863 2	Fresno City	30	102	1290	12.65	500	3625	.218	1227	12.03	1709.0	16.8
0.18168551623495074 3	Sequoias	23	86	920	10.70	422	2741	.182	774	9.00	1272.0	14.8
0.17723718505647262 4	Taft	28	102	1012	9.92	400	3453	.177	886	8.69	1319.5	12.9
0.1445324881141046 5	Cerro Coso	27	103	934	9.07	478	3155	.145	848	8.23	1247.5	12.1
0.13073815644509731 6	Merced	23	86	863	10.03	507	2723	.131	742	8.63	1155.0	13.4
0.09581881533101046 7	Reedley	24	91	880	9.67	550	3444	.096	815	8.96	1162.0	12.8
0.09326424870466321 8	Porterville	22	79	551	6.97	371	1930	.093	485	6.14	769.0	9.7
0.08705803869246165 9	Coalinga	25	93	822	8.84	561	2998	.087	816	8.77	1137.0	12.2

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
0.17723718505647262 1	Taft	28	102	1958	19.20	101	97	150	1.47
0.21793103448275863 2	Fresno City	30	102	1938	19.00	43	146	116	1.14
0.08705803869246165 3	Coalinga	25	93	1550	16.67	62	104	114	1.23
0.1445324881141046 4	Cerro Coso	27	103	1484	14.41	76	13	83	0.80
0.18168551623495074 5	Sequoias	23	86	1348	15.67	154	64	186	2.16
1.5718015665796345 6	Columbia	24	89	1265	14.21	119	0	119	1.34
0.09326424870466321 7	Porterville	22	79	1062	13.44	110	0	110	1.39
0.13073815644509731 8	Merced	23	86	921	10.71	47	140	117	1.36
0.09581881533101046 9	Reedley	24	91	806	8.86	64	28	78	0.86

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
0.21793103448275863 1	Fresno City	30	102	303	2.97	1513	105
0.1445324881141046 2	Cerro Coso	27	103	231	2.24	1561	234
0.09581881533101046 3	Reedley	24	91	204	2.24	1768	256
0.08705803869246165 4	Coalinga	25	93	201	2.16	1	121
0.13073815644509731 5	Merced	23	86	175	2.03	0	0
0.18168551623495074 6	Sequoias	23	86	166	1.93	1552	202
0.17723718505647262 7	Taft	28	102	158	1.55	1799	220
0.09326424870466321 8	Porterville	22	79	108	1.37	0	0
1.5718015665796345 9	Columbia	24	89	97	1.09	1147	46

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
3.5210084033613445 1	Columbia	16	62	433	6.98	14	119	3.521	370	5.97	552.0	8.9
0.26622596153846156 2	Fresno City	16	50	661	13.22	218	1664	.266	622	12.44	904.0	18.1
0.19692460317460317 3	Sequoias	16	61	697	11.43	300	2016	.197	580	9.51	927.5	15.2
0.18406169665809768 4	Taft	16	58	599	10.33	241	1945	.184	537	9.26	780.5	13.5
0.14298808432630614 5	Cerro Coso	16	64	630	9.84	318	2182	.143	576	9.00	822.5	12.9
0.13583252190847128 6	Merced	16	61	630	10.33	351	2054	.136	541	8.87	846.0	13.9
0.10380179410508329 7	Reedley	16	62	616	9.94	373	2341	.104	571	9.21	794.0	12.8
0.08540685944855414 8	Porterville	16	60	418	6.97	291	1487	.085	369	6.15	583.0	9.7
0.06813304721030043 9	Coalinga	16	58	488	8.41	361	1864	.068	483	8.33	686.0	11.8

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
0.18406169665809768 1	Taft	16	58	1154	19.90	64	63	96	1.65
0.26622596153846156 2	Fresno City	16	50	1001	20.02	23	76	61	1.22
0.06813304721030043 3	Coalinga	16	58	962	16.59	44	68	78	1.34
0.14298808432630614 4	Cerro Coso	16	64	953	14.89	47	3	49	0.76
0.19692460317460317 5	Sequoias	16	61	950	15.57	99	35	117	1.91
3.5210084033613445 6	Columbia	16	62	754	12.16	81	0	81	1.31
0.08540685944855414 7	Porterville	16	60	866	14.43	88	0	88	1.47
0.13583252190847128 8	Merced	16	61	668	10.95	39	106	92	1.51
0.10380179410508329 9	Reedley	16	62	517	8.34	49	20	59	0.95

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
0.26622596153846156 1	Fresno City	16	50	182	3.64	641	44
0.14298808432630614 2	Cerro Coso	16	64	144	2.25	1032	137
0.10380179410508329 3	Reedley	16	62	119	1.92	1286	161
0.06813304721030043 4	Coalinga	16	58	120	2.07	1	81
0.13583252190847128 5	Merced	16	61	124	2.03	0	0
0.19692460317460317 6	Sequoias	16	61	114	1.87	1079	125
0.18406169665809768 7	Taft	16	58	86	1.48	975	117
0.08540685944855414 8	Porterville	16	60	77	1.28	0	0
3.5210084033613445 9	Columbia	16	62	38	0.61	607	18