Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
87.07142857142857 1 Fresno City 28 903-2092 43.2 344-1028 33.5 290-389 74.6 87.1
70.53571428571429 2 Sequoias 28 726-1881 38.6 197-668 29.5 326-507 64.3 70.5
66.61538461538461 3 Lemoore 26 621-1568 39.6 197-613 32.1 249-399 62.4 66.6
64.5925925925926 4 Merced 27 673-1826 36.9 120-487 24.6 278-473 58.8 64.6
62.541666666666664 5 Reedley 24 589-1478 39.9 55-250 22.0 271-471 57.5 62.5
49.95 6 Porterville 20 376-1171 32.1 56-240 23.3 191-339 56.3 50.0
40.38461538461539 7 Taft 13 173-730 23.7 57-344 16.6 72-157 45.9 40.4
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
64.5925925925926 1 Merced 27 17.1 23.8 40.9 7.7
70.53571428571429 2 Sequoias 28 16.2 25.8 42.0 0.5
62.541666666666664 3 Reedley 24 12.8 26.5 39.3 -3.5
87.07142857142857 4 Fresno City 28 12.0 30.1 42.1 1.1
66.61538461538461 5 Lemoore 26 10.7 21.4 32.1 -8.2
49.95 6 Porterville 20 9.8 24.6 34.4 -8.9
40.38461538461539 7 Taft 13 5.8 21.8 27.6 -32.8
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
49.95 1 Porterville 20 23.1 8.0 1.1 8.8
62.541666666666664 2 Reedley 24 20.7 13.9 4.8 14.5
40.38461538461539 3 Taft 13 20.6 9.1 1.2 7.5
64.5925925925926 4 Merced 27 19.7 14.9 2.4 12.9
70.53571428571429 5 Sequoias 28 19.3 13.5 3.0 13.5
87.07142857142857 6 Fresno City 28 16.5 15.2 3.1 22.1
66.61538461538461 7 Lemoore 26 16.3 11.8 2.3 13.1
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
87.07142857142857 1 Fresno City 28 13.5 1.011 0.282
66.61538461538461 2 Lemoore 26 17.0 0.906 0.063
70.53571428571429 3 Sequoias 28 17.6 0.889 0.149
64.5925925925926 4 Merced 27 14.6 0.818 0.072
62.541666666666664 5 Reedley 24 17.0 0.789 -0.077
49.95 6 Porterville 20 12.3 0.622 -0.367
40.38461538461539 7 Taft 13 13.9 0.525 -0.472
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
40.38461538461539 1 Taft 13 423-1002 42.2 105-333 31.5 82.2
49.95 2 Porterville 20 556-1391 40.0 145-509 28.5 74.7
62.541666666666664 3 Reedley 24 652-1638 39.8 130-434 30.0 71.0
66.61538461538461 4 Lemoore 26 583-1519 38.4 133-493 27.0 65.0
87.07142857142857 5 Fresno City 28 671-1878 35.7 139-585 23.8 62.2
70.53571428571429 6 Sequoias 28 595-1687 35.3 133-531 25.0 58.6
64.5925925925926 7 Merced 27 557-1486 37.5 118-430 27.4 55.8
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
40.38461538461539 1 Taft 13 21.5 38.9 60.5 -32.8
49.95 2 Porterville 20 15.0 28.3 43.3 -8.9
62.541666666666664 3 Reedley 24 15.0 27.8 42.8 -3.5
87.07142857142857 4 Fresno City 28 13.3 27.7 41.0 1.1
66.61538461538461 5 Lemoore 26 12.7 27.6 40.3 -8.2
70.53571428571429 6 Sequoias 28 14.6 26.8 41.4 0.5
64.5925925925926 7 Merced 27 9.7 23.5 33.2 7.7
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
70.53571428571429 1 Sequoias 28 24.2 9.6 2.8 12.0
87.07142857142857 2 Fresno City 28 24.0 9.8 2.5 11.1
64.5925925925926 3 Merced 27 22.0 11.0 3.1 10.4
66.61538461538461 4 Lemoore 26 20.9 10.8 2.9 14.6
62.541666666666664 5 Reedley 24 19.8 12.0 2.9 16.5
40.38461538461539 6 Taft 13 18.2 11.5 3.8 20.9
49.95 7 Porterville 20 15.3 14.3 4.0 16.4
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
70.53571428571429 1 Sequoias 28 16.6 0.740 0.149
64.5925925925926 2 Merced 27 15.6 0.745 0.072
62.541666666666664 3 Reedley 24 15.5 0.865 -0.077
66.61538461538461 4 Lemoore 26 14.5 0.842 0.063
49.95 5 Porterville 20 13.8 0.988 -0.367
40.38461538461539 6 Taft 13 13.5 0.996 -0.472
87.07142857142857 7 Fresno City 28 13.1 0.730 0.282
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
92.54545454545455 1 Fresno City 11 380-827 45.9 142-401 35.4 115-159 72.3 92.5
73.36363636363636 2 Sequoias 11 301-779 38.6 66-267 24.7 139-211 65.9 73.4
63.0 3 Lemoore 9 204-537 38.0 63-221 28.5 96-151 63.6 63.0
69.3 4 Merced 10 265-685 38.7 52-197 26.4 111-176 63.1 69.3
58.4 5 Reedley 10 223-584 38.2 30-121 24.8 111-190 58.4 58.4
48.0 6 Porterville 9 162-518 31.3 23-92 25.0 85-136 62.5 48.0
28.0 7 Taft 2 22-114 19.3 10-63 15.9 2-8 25.0 28.0
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
69.3 1 Merced 10 19.7 25.8 45.5 17.2
73.36363636363636 2 Sequoias 11 18.0 27.8 45.8 4.0
58.4 3 Reedley 10 12.1 26.7 38.8 -2.8
92.54545454545455 4 Fresno City 11 12.2 32.0 44.2 8.9
63.0 5 Lemoore 9 8.2 22.9 31.1 -10.8
48.0 6 Porterville 9 7.8 26.0 33.8 -12.7
28.0 7 Taft 2 4.0 21.5 25.5 -37.5
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
48.0 1 Porterville 9 25.2 5.9 1.4 6.6
58.4 2 Reedley 10 21.8 12.6 5.9 14.2
28.0 3 Taft 2 28.0 7.0 0.5 7.0
69.3 4 Merced 10 17.7 14.9 3.0 13.5
73.36363636363636 5 Sequoias 11 20.4 16.5 3.9 15.0
92.54545454545455 6 Fresno City 11 17.9 15.5 2.8 25.0
63.0 7 Lemoore 9 21.0 10.6 3.0 12.2
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
92.54545454545455 1 Fresno City 11 13.0 1.050 0.357
63.0 2 Lemoore 9 17.4 0.779 -0.112
73.36363636363636 3 Sequoias 11 15.7 0.886 0.199
69.3 4 Merced 10 15.5 0.920 0.241
58.4 5 Reedley 10 15.2 0.753 -0.133
48.0 6 Porterville 9 10.3 0.581 -0.491
28.0 7 Taft 2 4.5 0.337 -0.939
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
28.0 1 Taft 2 92-177 52.0 18-58 31.0 104.0
48.0 2 Porterville 9 305-713 42.8 87-281 31.0 86.0
58.4 3 Reedley 10 281-719 39.1 72-232 31.0 73.6
63.0 4 Lemoore 9 230-576 39.9 60-192 31.3 73.4
92.54545454545455 5 Fresno City 11 244-704 34.7 52-215 24.2 58.1
73.36363636363636 6 Sequoias 11 227-649 35.0 52-208 25.0 56.5
69.3 7 Merced 10 178-506 35.2 45-176 25.6 51.8
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
28.0 1 Taft 2 21.5 41.5 63.0 -37.5
48.0 2 Porterville 9 18.0 28.4 46.4 -12.7
58.4 3 Reedley 10 14.1 27.5 41.6 -2.8
92.54545454545455 4 Fresno City 11 11.3 24.0 35.3 8.9
63.0 5 Lemoore 9 12.8 29.1 41.9 -10.8
73.36363636363636 6 Sequoias 11 13.5 28.4 41.8 4.0
69.3 7 Merced 10 6.9 21.4 28.3 17.2
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
73.36363636363636 1 Sequoias 11 27.9 10.2 3.3 11.5
92.54545454545455 2 Fresno City 11 23.9 11.5 1.6 8.6
69.3 3 Merced 10 23.6 10.8 3.0 9.4
63.0 4 Lemoore 9 19.3 14.7 3.4 16.8
58.4 5 Reedley 10 17.0 12.8 3.3 17.7
28.0 6 Taft 2 11.5 16.5 3.5 30.5
48.0 7 Porterville 9 12.8 16.7 5.4 21.7
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
73.36363636363636 1 Sequoias 11 15.9 0.687 0.199
69.3 2 Merced 10 14.3 0.680 0.241
58.4 3 Reedley 10 14.2 0.886 -0.133
63.0 4 Lemoore 9 16.4 0.891 -0.112
48.0 5 Porterville 9 13.0 1.072 -0.491
28.0 6 Taft 2 4.0 1.276 -0.939
92.54545454545455 7 Fresno City 11 13.5 0.693 0.357