Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
168.0 1 Porterville 36 947 296 152 111 133 .313 .389 .421
252.0 2 Fresno City 40 1099 340 229 133 170 .309 .387 .479
148.0 3 Sequoias 32 821 247 133 65 128 .301 .369 .418
179.0 4 Merced 38 977 277 162 114 184 .284 .368 .372
120.0 5 Reedley 30 738 200 95 70 101 .271 .341 .346
134.0 6 Taft 37 948 249 105 93 138 .263 .337 .328
.328 7 Coalinga - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
252.0 1 Fresno City 40 84 15 24 123
168.0 2 Porterville 36 56 10 9 75
148.0 3 Sequoias 32 57 6 9 72
179.0 4 Merced 38 50 12 4 66
134.0 5 Taft 37 37 8 3 48
120.0 6 Reedley 30 36 5 3 44
44 7 Coalinga - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
252.0 1 Fresno City 40 252 526 81 14
179.0 2 Merced 38 179 363 31 11
168.0 3 Porterville 36 168 399 46 4
148.0 4 Sequoias 32 148 343 19 6
134.0 5 Taft 37 134 311 31 11
120.0 6 Reedley 30 120 255 39 9
9 7 Coalinga - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
252.0 1 Fresno City 40 12 8 26 0 94 87 1.08 1278
179.0 2 Merced 38 22 9 6 0 141 207 .68 1128
134.0 3 Taft 37 17 8 28 5 126 131 .96 1094
168.0 4 Porterville 36 12 6 11 3 52 85 .61 1087
148.0 5 Sequoias 32 26 5 25 6 156 132 1.18 942
120.0 6 Reedley 30 11 5 10 6 105 114 .92 834
834 7 Coalinga - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
148.0 1 Sequoias 32 32 190.1 258 215 172 6.33
168.0 2 Porterville 36 36 204.2 361 251 184 6.29
120.0 3 Reedley 30 30 181.2 317 201 148 5.70
179.0 4 Merced 38 38 238.0 274 208 170 5.00
134.0 5 Taft 37 37 234.0 347 224 159 4.76
252.0 6 Fresno City 40 40 271.2 261 124 110 2.83
2.83 7 Coalinga - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
120.0 1 Reedley 30 30 63 2.43 16 2.11
168.0 2 Porterville 36 36 62 2.12 13 2.09
148.0 3 Sequoias 32 32 97 3.57 12 1.98
134.0 4 Taft 37 37 154 4.61 11 1.87
179.0 5 Merced 38 38 147 4.32 13 1.55
252.0 6 Fresno City 40 40 160 4.12 11 1.41
1.41 7 Coalinga - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
252.0 1 Fresno City 40 1148 815 302 31 9 .973
179.0 2 Merced 38 948 676 213 59 30 .938
148.0 3 Sequoias 32 874 569 246 59 20 .932
134.0 4 Taft 37 1033 702 253 78 19 .924
168.0 5 Porterville 36 995 633 282 80 31 .920
120.0 6 Reedley 30 724 502 160 62 6 .914
.914 7 Coalinga - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
252.0 1 Fresno City 40 13 27 16 .372 1
134.0 2 Taft 37 13 58 13 .183 0
120.0 3 Reedley 30 9 33 7 .175 0
148.0 4 Sequoias 32 5 85 7 .076 4
179.0 5 Merced 38 4 73 5 .064 1
168.0 6 Porterville 36 4 50 3 .057 1
1 7 Coalinga - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
120.0 1 Reedley 13.0 763 59
148.0 2 Sequoias 13.0 650 50
252.0 3 Fresno City 20.0 0 0
179.0 4 Merced 19.0 0 0
168.0 5 Porterville 13.0 0 0
134.0 6 Taft 16.0 - -
- 7 Coalinga - - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
73.0 1 Porterville 15 380 115 65 58 54 .303 .402 .416
125.0 2 Fresno City 15 409 149 115 63 44 .364 .455 .589
67.0 3 Sequoias 15 401 125 62 35 55 .312 .384 .446
102.0 4 Merced 16 453 154 95 39 55 .340 .402 .466
49.0 5 Reedley 15 386 94 38 31 55 .244 .308 .306
42.0 6 Taft 15 372 84 35 30 58 .226 .291 .293
.293 7 Coalinga - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
125.0 1 Fresno City 15 35 12 11 58
73.0 2 Porterville 15 28 3 3 34
67.0 3 Sequoias 15 33 3 5 41
102.0 4 Merced 16 29 8 4 41
42.0 5 Taft 15 15 2 2 19
49.0 6 Reedley 15 17 2 1 20
20 7 Coalinga - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
125.0 1 Fresno City 15 125 241 46 3
102.0 2 Merced 16 102 211 16 5
73.0 3 Porterville 15 73 158 20 1
67.0 4 Sequoias 15 67 179 9 3
42.0 5 Taft 15 42 109 12 6
49.0 6 Reedley 15 49 118 23 6
6 7 Coalinga - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
125.0 1 Fresno City 15 8 3 12 0 24 27 .89 495
102.0 2 Merced 16 12 6 3 0 68 101 .67 513
42.0 3 Taft 15 6 4 8 1 33 45 .73 420
73.0 4 Porterville 15 8 4 3 0 11 28 .39 453
67.0 5 Sequoias 15 13 2 15 2 79 64 1.23 466
49.0 6 Reedley 15 6 2 6 3 59 64 .92 431
431 7 Coalinga - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
67.0 1 Sequoias 15 15 95.1 116 85 70 5.14
73.0 2 Porterville 15 15 88.0 155 108 74 5.89
49.0 3 Reedley 15 15 94.0 162 107 84 6.26
102.0 4 Merced 16 16 106.2 92 60 49 3.22
42.0 5 Taft 15 15 99.0 126 68 50 3.54
125.0 6 Fresno City 15 15 95.2 72 28 26 1.90
1.90 7 Coalinga - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
49.0 1 Reedley 15 15 23 1.71 9 2.19
73.0 2 Porterville 15 15 37 2.94 6 2.10
67.0 3 Sequoias 15 15 51 3.74 4 1.83
42.0 4 Taft 15 15 62 4.38 3 1.61
102.0 5 Merced 16 16 87 5.71 1 1.27
125.0 6 Fresno City 15 15 62 4.54 3 1.18
1.18 7 Coalinga - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
125.0 1 Fresno City 15 394 287 97 10 1 .975
102.0 2 Merced 16 439 320 97 22 10 .950
67.0 3 Sequoias 15 414 284 108 22 7 .947
42.0 4 Taft 15 444 297 118 29 6 .935
73.0 5 Porterville 15 419 265 116 38 15 .909
49.0 6 Reedley 15 408 282 96 30 4 .926
.926 7 Coalinga - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
125.0 1 Fresno City 15 1 2 8 .800 1
42.0 2 Taft 15 6 26 8 .235 0
49.0 3 Reedley 15 5 16 1 .059 0
67.0 4 Sequoias 15 2 39 4 .093 0
102.0 5 Merced 16 2 16 1 .059 0
73.0 6 Porterville 15 3 26 1 .037 0
0 7 Coalinga - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
49.0 1 Reedley 5.0 421 85
67.0 2 Sequoias 7.0 350 50
125.0 3 Fresno City 8.0 - -
102.0 4 Merced 8.0 0 0
73.0 5 Porterville 8.0 0 0
42.0 6 Taft 8.0 - -
- 7 Coalinga - - -