Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.33678756476683935 1 Fresno City 21 579 195 121 58 58 .337 .404 .528
0.328 2 Sequoias 23 625 205 124 33 44 .328 .367 .446
0.3032128514056225 3 Porterville 20 498 151 96 73 85 .303 .397 .476
0.2870229007633588 4 Reedley 25 655 188 99 58 63 .287 .351 .342
0.26785714285714285 5 Merced 20 504 135 73 64 63 .268 .349 .381
0.25952380952380955 6 Taft 18 420 109 47 25 91 .260 .301 .324
0.20270270270270271 7 Coalinga 18 370 75 29 25 78 .203 .257 .259
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
69.0 1 Fresno City 21 46 4 19 69
49.0 2 Sequoias 23 29 15 5 49
46.0 3 Porterville 20 24 4 18 46
37.0 4 Merced 20 23 8 6 37
31.0 5 Reedley 25 27 3 1 31
21.0 6 Taft 18 16 4 1 21
18.0 7 Coalinga 18 16 1 1 18
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
149.0 1 Sequoias 23 149 279 6 4
145.0 2 Fresno City 21 145 306 21 3
129.0 3 Reedley 25 129 224 69 7
112.0 4 Porterville 20 112 237 12 3
89.0 5 Merced 20 89 192 22 3
61.0 6 Taft 18 61 136 25 7
37.0 7 Coalinga 18 37 96 12 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
756.0 1 Reedley 25 9 5 29 10 170 130 1.31 756
703.0 2 Sequoias 23 10 8 27 5 115 127 .91 703
657.0 3 Fresno City 21 9 2 9 3 49 52 .94 657
587.0 4 Merced 20 4 10 5 1 88 107 .82 587
587.0 4 Porterville 20 5 1 10 2 41 46 .89 587
445.0 6 Taft 18 0 0 0 1 41 46 .89 445
399.0 7 Coalinga 18 2 - 2 2 44 28 1.57 399
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.060240963855422 1 Taft 18 18 83.0 249 237 143 12.06
9.83916083916084 2 Coalinga 18 18 95.1 210 242 134 9.84
7.142441860465117 3 Porterville 20 20 114.2 200 180 117 7.14
4.651898734177215 4 Reedley 25 25 158.0 214 138 105 4.65
4.292817679558011 5 Merced 20 20 120.2 158 106 74 4.29
3.87603305785124 6 Fresno City 21 21 121.0 167 109 67 3.88
3.652173913043478 7 Sequoias 23 23 145.2 145 87 76 3.65
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.7228915662650603 1 Taft 18 18 60 5.06 7 3.72
3.314685314685315 2 Coalinga 18 18 35 2.57 12 3.31
2.3197674418604652 3 Porterville 20 20 28 1.71 7 2.32
1.8925619834710743 4 Fresno City 21 21 56 3.24 14 1.89
1.6645569620253164 5 Reedley 25 25 57 2.53 20 1.66
1.4917127071823204 6 Merced 20 20 75 4.35 2 1.49
1.2356979405034325 7 Sequoias 23 23 148 7.11 7 1.24
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9532062391681109 1 Sequoias 23 577 432 118 27 1 .953
0.9480286738351255 2 Fresno City 21 558 348 181 29 3 .948
0.9405099150141643 3 Reedley 25 706 487 177 42 1 .941
0.9247104247104247 4 Merced 20 518 359 120 39 9 .925
0.8959731543624161 5 Porterville 20 596 340 194 62 13 .896
0.8898916967509025 6 Coalinga 18 554 254 239 61 9 .890
0.8223844282238443 7 Taft 18 411 250 88 73 42 .822
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.25 1 Reedley 25 6 12 4 .250 0
0.11764705882352941 2 Merced 20 2 30 4 .118 0
0.1 3 Fresno City 21 10 18 2 .100 0
0.07142857142857142 4 Sequoias 23 3 26 2 .071 0
0.038461538461538464 5 Taft 18 2 50 2 .038 0
0.02564102564102564 6 Porterville 20 1 38 1 .026 0
0 7 Coalinga 18 - 84 - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
82.0 1 Reedley 13.0 1,054 82
46.0 2 Sequoias 12.0 550 46
0.0 3 Coalinga 10.0 0 0
0 4 Fresno City 7.0 - -
0.0 5 Merced 8.0 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 8.0 0 0
0.0 5 Taft 10.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.37142857142857144 1 Fresno City 6 175 65 36 13 13 .371 .424 .560
0.3963963963963964 2 Sequoias 4 111 44 28 4 3 .396 .412 .559
0.2248062015503876 3 Porterville 5 129 29 23 26 27 .225 .355 .442
0.3351063829787234 4 Reedley 7 188 63 43 16 16 .335 .391 .404
0.3795180722891566 5 Merced 6 166 63 43 19 17 .380 .432 .608
0.2204724409448819 6 Taft 6 127 28 5 7 37 .220 .261 .252
0.12605042016806722 7 Coalinga 6 119 15 4 10 24 .126 .194 .160
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
23.0 1 Fresno City 6 18 0 5 23
10.0 2 Sequoias 4 5 2 3 10
13.0 3 Porterville 5 5 1 7 13
23.0 4 Merced 6 12 7 4 23
13.0 5 Reedley 7 13 - - 13
4.0 6 Taft 6 4 0 0 4
3.0 7 Coalinga 6 2 1 - 3
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
36.0 1 Sequoias 4 36 62 0 0
52.0 2 Fresno City 6 52 98 13 0
57.0 3 Reedley 7 57 76 35 4
28.0 4 Porterville 5 28 57 2 0
56.0 5 Merced 6 56 101 17 1
10.0 6 Taft 6 10 32 2 3
3.0 7 Coalinga 6 3 19 1 -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
213.0 1 Reedley 7 2 1 6 1 45 26 1.73 213
127.0 2 Sequoias 4 1 3 8 1 22 23 .96 127
197.0 3 Fresno City 6 3 0 6 1 7 12 .58 197
194.0 4 Merced 6 1 6 2 - 11 32 .34 194
158.0 5 Porterville 5 0 0 3 - 5 18 .28 158
134.0 6 Taft 6 0 0 0 1 11 16 .69 134
129.0 7 Coalinga 6 - - - - 11 13 .85 129
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
10.25581395348837 1 Taft 6 6 28.2 62 70 42 10.26
11.357142857142858 2 Coalinga 6 6 32.2 82 82 53 11.36
2.5454545454545454 3 Porterville 5 5 33.0 37 25 12 2.55
2.7674418604651163 4 Reedley 7 7 43.0 42 26 17 2.77
2.121212121212121 5 Merced 6 6 33.0 34 20 10 2.12
1.5135135135135136 6 Fresno City 6 6 37.0 31 15 8 1.51
1.1666666666666665 7 Sequoias 4 4 24.0 22 5 4 1.17
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.895348837209302 1 Taft 6 6 20 4.88 2 2.90
3.153061224489796 2 Coalinga 6 6 12 2.57 4 3.15
1.3636363636363635 3 Porterville 5 5 5 1.06 2 1.36
1.3243243243243243 4 Fresno City 6 6 25 4.73 5 1.32
1.3953488372093024 5 Reedley 7 7 20 3.26 5 1.40
1.2424242424242424 6 Merced 6 6 33 7.00 0 1.24
1.0 7 Sequoias 4 4 21 6.13 1 1.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.956989247311828 1 Sequoias 4 93 71 18 4 0 .957
0.9789473684210527 2 Fresno City 6 190 114 72 4 0 .979
0.9447004608294931 3 Reedley 7 217 135 70 12 - .945
0.9295774647887324 4 Merced 6 142 99 33 10 2 .930
0.9184782608695652 5 Porterville 5 184 97 72 15 4 .918
0.9105691056910569 6 Coalinga 6 246 115 109 22 6 .911
0.8053691275167785 7 Taft 6 149 86 34 29 25 .805
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
1.0 1 Reedley 7 2 - 1 1.000 -
0.2857142857142857 2 Merced 6 1 5 2 .286 0
0.4 3 Fresno City 6 3 3 2 .400 0
0.0 4 Sequoias 4 1 4 0 .000 0
0.0 4 Taft 6 0 22 0 .000 0
0.0 4 Porterville 5 0 4 0 .000 0
0 7 Coalinga 6 - 32 - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
77.0 1 Reedley 5.0 382 77
25.0 2 Sequoias 2.0 50 25
0.0 3 Coalinga 4.0 0 0
0 4 Fresno City 4.0 - -
0.0 5 Merced 2.0 0 0
0.0 5 Porterville 1 0 0
0 7 Taft 2.0 - -