Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.328884652049571 1 Canyons 42 1049 345 229 142 131 .329 .417 .493
0.3173777315296566 2 LA Valley 35 961 305 216 122 121 .317 .416 .478
0.3134469696969697 3 Barstow 38 1056 331 227 141 150 .313 .405 .414
0.3096947935368043 4 Antelope Valley 44 1114 345 209 109 139 .310 .376 .463
0.29119850187265917 5 LA Mission 40 1068 311 172 102 180 .291 .374 .400
0.29054640069384213 6 Citrus 42 1153 335 188 112 128 .291 .360 .399
0.27033792240300375 7 Victor Valley 33 799 216 106 62 149 .270 .331 .315
0.24665676077265974 8 Glendale 30 673 166 96 89 128 .247 .344 .321
.321 9 West LA - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
123.0 1 Canyons 42 89 19 15 123
100.0 2 Antelope Valley 44 58 13 29 100
97.0 3 LA Valley 35 64 9 24 97
90.0 4 Citrus 42 68 9 13 90
81.0 5 LA Mission 40 59 9 13 81
77.0 6 Barstow 38 57 11 9 77
34.0 7 Glendale 30 22 8 4 34
30.0 8 Victor Valley 33 24 6 - 30
0 9 West LA - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
273.0 1 Canyons 42 273 517 67 14
269.0 2 Barstow 38 269 437 67 7
268.0 3 LA Valley 35 268 459 52 6
250.0 4 Antelope Valley 44 250 516 36 6
209.0 5 Citrus 42 209 460 30 7
202.0 6 LA Mission 40 202 427 35 3
128.0 7 Victor Valley 33 128 252 25 6
116.0 8 Glendale 30 116 216 37 6
6 9 West LA - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1327.0 1 Citrus 42 18 10 34 18 304 374 .81 1327
1291.0 2 Antelope Valley 44 12 6 50 8 247 247 1.00 1291
1256.0 3 Canyons 42 24 10 31 3 239 306 .78 1256
1255.0 4 LA Mission 40 44 8 33 11 268 246 1.09 1255
1241.0 5 Barstow 38 22 1 21 6 213 253 .84 1241
1144.0 6 LA Valley 35 44 4 13 9 246 221 1.11 1144
878.0 7 Victor Valley 33 10 - 7 17 196 124 1.58 878
787.0 8 Glendale 30 13 5 7 4 197 139 1.42 787
0 9 West LA - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
10.911340206185567 1 Glendale 30 30 161.2 350 326 252 10.91
9.203935599284435 2 Victor Valley 33 33 186.1 369 364 245 9.20
6.0 3 Barstow 38 38 235.2 385 282 202 6.00
4.835149863760218 4 Canyons 42 42 244.2 338 211 169 4.84
4.293577981651376 5 LA Mission 40 40 254.1 335 203 156 4.29
3.6507692307692308 6 LA Valley 35 35 216.2 278 177 113 3.65
2.9256198347107443 7 Citrus 42 42 282.1 318 155 118 2.93
2.580853816300129 8 Antelope Valley 44 44 257.2 233 120 95 2.58
0.0 9 West LA - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 44 44 327 8.88 11 -
- 2 Barstow 38 38 89 2.64 9 -
- 2 Canyons 42 42 99 2.83 6 -
- 2 Citrus 42 42 100 2.48 10 -
- 2 Glendale 30 30 47 2.04 23 -
- 2 LA Mission 40 40 87 2.39 12 -
- 2 LA Valley 35 35 81 2.62 14 -
- 2 Victor Valley 33 33 109 4.09 16 -
- 2 West LA - - - .00 - -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.966824644549763 1 Antelope Valley 44 1055 802 218 35 6 .967
0.9590773809523809 2 Citrus 42 1344 846 443 55 6 .959
0.946949602122016 3 LA Mission 40 1131 731 340 60 13 .947
0.9415807560137457 4 Canyons 42 1164 713 383 68 8 .942
0.9326473339569691 5 LA Valley 35 1069 634 363 72 13 .933
0.9177101967799642 6 Barstow 38 1118 700 326 92 23 .918
0.9044862518089725 7 Glendale 30 691 468 157 66 20 .904
0.8576429404900817 8 Victor Valley 33 857 532 203 122 54 .858
.858 9 West LA - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3 1 Antelope Valley 44 10 14 6 .300 0
0.19047619047619047 2 LA Valley 35 19 34 8 .190 -
0.15789473684210525 3 Barstow 38 2 64 12 .158 0
0.09302325581395349 4 LA Mission 40 11 39 4 .093 1
0.09090909090909091 5 Citrus 42 17 50 5 .091 1
0.07246376811594203 6 Canyons 42 16 64 5 .072 -
0.022727272727272728 7 Victor Valley 33 6 129 3 .023 1
0.017241379310344827 8 Glendale 30 7 57 1 .017 -
- 9 West LA - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
95.0 1 Barstow 11.0 1,037 95
53.0 2 Canyons 20.0 1,045 53
49.0 3 Citrus 22.0 1,057 49
30.0 4 LA Valley 14.0 420 30
6.0 5 Antelope Valley 17.0 100 6
4.0 6 LA Mission 12.0 40 4
1.0 7 Glendale 15.0 15 1
0.0 8 Victor Valley 15.0 0 0
0 9 West LA - - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.4065040650406504 1 Canyons 14 369 150 98 48 31 .407 .484 .566
0.3185378590078329 2 LA Valley 14 383 122 95 42 54 .319 .410 .509
0.29577464788732394 3 Barstow 14 355 105 61 40 64 .296 .370 .389
0.3466666666666667 4 Antelope Valley 14 375 130 77 32 32 .347 .402 .539
0.3526315789473684 5 LA Mission 14 380 134 78 33 57 .353 .425 .492
0.336734693877551 6 Citrus 14 392 132 81 38 34 .337 .400 .459
0.2601880877742947 7 Victor Valley 14 319 83 32 20 63 .260 .306 .298
0.20376175548589343 8 Glendale 14 319 65 31 43 73 .204 .306 .260
.260 9 West LA - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
47.0 1 Canyons 14 37 8 2 47
42.0 2 Antelope Valley 14 25 4 13 42
47.0 3 LA Valley 14 32 4 11 47
35.0 4 Citrus 14 26 5 4 35
39.0 5 LA Mission 14 31 2 6 39
22.0 6 Barstow 14 15 3 4 22
13.0 7 Glendale 14 9 3 1 13
10.0 8 Victor Valley 14 8 2 - 10
0 9 West LA - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
121.0 1 Canyons 14 121 209 28 5
70.0 2 Barstow 14 70 138 21 1
115.0 3 LA Valley 14 115 195 17 2
96.0 4 Antelope Valley 14 96 202 16 2
90.0 5 Citrus 14 90 180 14 3
88.0 6 LA Mission 14 88 187 12 -
37.0 7 Victor Valley 14 37 95 10 1
44.0 8 Glendale 14 44 83 16 3
3 9 West LA - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
449.0 1 Citrus 14 7 5 7 4 97 115 .84 449
428.0 2 Antelope Valley 14 4 2 15 2 106 105 1.01 428
438.0 3 Canyons 14 10 3 8 2 83 94 .88 438
445.0 4 LA Mission 14 18 4 10 3 98 93 1.05 445
403.0 5 Barstow 14 2 - 6 1 81 95 .85 403
452.0 6 LA Valley 14 18 1 8 3 108 81 1.33 452
342.0 7 Victor Valley 14 1 - 2 11 100 58 1.72 342
373.0 8 Glendale 14 5 2 4 3 105 67 1.57 373
0 9 West LA - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
11.784810126582279 1 Glendale 14 14 79.0 170 154 133 11.78
8.603524229074889 2 Victor Valley 14 14 75.2 147 160 93 8.60
5.3999999999999995 3 Barstow 14 14 81.2 144 111 63 5.40
3.133064516129032 4 Canyons 14 14 82.2 91 50 37 3.13
4.135135135135135 5 LA Mission 14 14 86.1 114 74 51 4.14
4.035294117647059 6 LA Valley 14 14 85.0 121 67 49 4.04
2.535849056603774 7 Citrus 14 14 88.1 90 33 32 2.54
0.6847826086956522 8 Antelope Valley 14 14 92.0 44 12 9 0.68
0.0 9 West LA - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Antelope Valley 14 14 160 12.17 1 -
- 2 Barstow 14 14 26 2.23 4 -
- 2 Canyons 14 14 44 3.73 2 -
- 2 Citrus 14 14 47 3.72 5 -
- 2 Glendale 14 14 19 1.68 13 -
- 2 LA Mission 14 14 39 3.16 6 -
- 2 LA Valley 14 14 30 2.47 4 -
- 2 Victor Valley 14 14 43 3.98 6 -
- 2 West LA - - - .00 - -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.975609756097561 1 Antelope Valley 14 328 275 45 8 4 .976
0.9734299516908212 2 Citrus 14 414 265 138 11 1 .973
0.937984496124031 3 LA Mission 14 387 259 104 24 6 .938
0.9565217391304348 4 Canyons 14 391 248 126 17 3 .957
0.9452380952380952 5 LA Valley 14 420 257 140 23 6 .945
0.8816425120772947 6 Barstow 14 414 244 121 49 9 .882
0.9166666666666666 7 Glendale 14 336 240 68 28 6 .917
0.8518518518518519 8 Victor Valley 14 351 226 73 52 26 .852
.852 9 West LA - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.6666666666666666 1 Antelope Valley 14 1 1 2 .667 -
0.375 2 LA Valley 14 7 10 6 .375 -
0.08 3 Barstow 14 - 23 2 .080 -
0.1111111111111111 4 LA Mission 14 5 8 1 .111 1
0.07142857142857142 5 Citrus 14 5 13 1 .071 1
1 6 Canyons 14 6 11 - - -
0.021739130434782608 7 Victor Valley 14 2 45 1 .022 -
0.0 8 Glendale 14 3 23 0 .000 -
- 9 West LA - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
109.0 1 Barstow 7.0 763 109
62.0 2 Canyons 7.0 430 62
38.0 3 Citrus 7.0 262 38
29.0 4 LA Valley 7.0 200 29
0.0 5 Antelope Valley 7.0 0 0
6.0 6 LA Mission 7.0 40 6
0.0 7 Glendale 7.0 0 0
0.0 7 Victor Valley 7.0 0 0
0 9 West LA - - -