California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	1345	463	290	107	108	.344	.397	.526
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	1130	353	241	95	129	.312	.381	.466
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	1038	322	196	142	110	.310	.402	.416
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	931	283	146	87	102	.304	.372	.400
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	938	195	99	88	167	.208	.294	.257

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	75	19	44	138
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	79	16	21	116
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	57	16	7	80
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	49	11	6	66
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	20	10	2	32

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	318	708	87	8
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	281	527	39	3
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	243	432	121	27
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	169	372	30	2
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	104	241	6	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	21	15	21	10	304	374	.81	1509
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	34	5	3	9	267	285	.94	1267
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	27	13	38	8	347	222	1.56	1258
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	14	-	43	8	200	125	1.60	1075
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	27	3	19	9	296	204	1.45	1075

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.25692963752665243 1	Rio Hondo	40	40	239.0	351	248	166	4.86
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	40	244.2	356	207	161	4.61
0.3995703544575725 3	East Los Angeles	37	37	224.0	286	188	143	4.47
0.4161849710982659 4	Pasadena City	42	42	254.0	269	140	107	2.95
0.5263940520446097 5	Mt. San Antonio	49	49	317.2	183	70	41	0.90

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	49	350	7.71	10	0.83
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	40	45	1.29	13	-
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	42	129	3.56	18	-
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	37	106	3.31	11	-
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	40	124	3.63	12	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	1247	933	275	39	5	.969
0.4161849710982659 2	Pasadena City	42	1088	745	302	41	11	.962
0.4663716814159292 3	Chaffey	40	1213	738	424	51	21	.958
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	1036	618	352	66	8	.936
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	1150	676	358	116	21	.899

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.5263940520446097 1	Mt. San Antonio	49	7	18	6	.250	-
0.4663716814159292 2	Chaffey	40	12	47	12	.203	0
0.4161849710982659 3	Pasadena City	42	16	39	6	.133	-
0.3995703544575725 4	East Los Angeles	37	7	59	3	.048	-
0.25692963752665243 5	Rio Hondo	40	9	101	5	.047	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.4161849710982659 1	Pasadena City	13.0	658	51
0.5263940520446097 2	Mt. San Antonio	20.0	575	29
0.3995703544575725 3	East Los Angeles	19.0	165	9
0.25692963752665243 4	Rio Hondo	18.0	32	2
0.4663716814159292 5	Chaffey	19.0	37	2

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	609	226	152	53	40	.371	.425	.550
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	622	173	119	57	66	.278	.352	.442
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	546	162	94	74	63	.297	.384	.390
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	552	147	78	38	60	.266	.325	.355
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	513	102	41	44	92	.199	.270	.246

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	46	9	15	70
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	42	6	16	64
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	29	8	2	39
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	26	4	5	35
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	11	5	1	17

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	175	335	48	5
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	136	275	11	1
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	121	213	68	12
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	92	196	20	1
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	45	126	6	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	8	5	5	4	137	158	.87	680
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	17	5	2	3	154	174	.89	703
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	10	10	21	5	191	111	1.72	661
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	10	-	25	4	145	92	1.58	625
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	7	2	14	8	155	119	1.30	580

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.24561403508771928 1	Rio Hondo	22	22	132.0	216	170	106	5.62
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	22	141.0	206	121	91	4.52
0.35507246376811596 3	East Los Angeles	22	22	135.0	181	121	90	4.67
0.3901098901098901 4	Pasadena City	22	22	138.0	130	58	38	1.93
0.5500821018062397 5	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	136.0	47	14	9	0.46

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	22	177	9.11	4	0.57
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	22	28	1.39	6	-
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	22	70	3.55	7	-
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	22	55	2.85	8	-
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	22	61	3.23	7	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	513	389	109	15	1	.971
0.3901098901098901 2	Pasadena City	22	582	399	156	27	3	.954
0.44212218649517687 3	Chaffey	22	703	427	240	36	14	.949
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	636	378	218	40	4	.937
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	612	354	188	70	16	.886

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.5500821018062397 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	4	10	3	.231	-
0.44212218649517687 2	Chaffey	22	4	32	9	.220	-
0.3901098901098901 3	Pasadena City	22	12	24	2	.077	-
0.35507246376811596 4	East Los Angeles	22	7	46	3	.061	-
0.24561403508771928 5	Rio Hondo	22	7	65	5	.071	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.3901098901098901 1	Pasadena City	11.0	566	52
0.5500821018062397 2	Mt. San Antonio	11.0	316	29
0.35507246376811596 3	East Los Angeles	11.0	105	10
0.24561403508771928 4	Rio Hondo	11.0	32	3
0.44212218649517687 5	Chaffey	11.0	0	0