California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	1307	496	347	129	87	.379	.443	.552
1127.0 2	Southwestern	43	1127	368	215	97	94	.327	.389	.430
984.0 3	San Diego Mesa	40	984	349	235	142	104	.355	.445	.512
899.0 4	Desert	35	899	302	176	71	113	.336	.400	.472
894.0 5	Grossmont	35	894	277	142	85	128	.310	.374	.400
892.0 6	San Diego City	32	892	298	170	76	115	.334	.386	.433
744.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	34	744	183	105	90	139	.246	.339	.319
601.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	601	195	95	48	70	.324	.382	.414
564.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	26	564	124	59	65	90	.220	.325	.271

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	104	28	22	154
984.0 2	San Diego Mesa	40	70	14	19	103
899.0 3	Desert	35	69	13	9	91
1127.0 4	Southwestern	43	51	24	6	81
892.0 5	San Diego City	32	59	10	3	72
894.0 6	Grossmont	35	53	11	2	66
601.0 7	Imperial Valley	24	40	7	-	47
744.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	34	33	3	5	41
564.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	26	17	3	2	22

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	376	722	61	3
984.0 2	San Diego Mesa	40	281	504	54	11
1127.0 3	Southwestern	43	241	485	45	4
899.0 4	Desert	35	210	424	47	7
892.0 5	San Diego City	32	204	386	99	6
894.0 6	Grossmont	35	184	358	37	8
601.0 7	Imperial Valley	24	133	249	25	8
744.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	34	130	237	45	16
564.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	26	73	153	39	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	32	14	32	18	380	309	1.23	1514
1127.0 2	Southwestern	43	23	9	48	13	346	305	1.13	1304
984.0 3	San Diego Mesa	40	23	6	36	12	277	219	1.26	1191
899.0 4	Desert	35	31	10	19	17	245	204	1.20	1030
892.0 5	San Diego City	32	9	14	24	3	220	229	.96	1015
894.0 6	Grossmont	35	8	2	18	12	266	147	1.81	1007
744.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	34	17	5	17	7	227	122	1.86	873
601.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	12	6	18	3	75	53	1.42	685
564.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	26	24	2	20	7	141	96	1.47	675

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
744.0 1	San Bernardino Valley	34	34	176.2	443	396	294	11.65
564.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	26	26	132.1	298	237	204	10.79
894.0 3	Grossmont	35	35	199.0	371	324	261	9.18
601.0 4	Imperial Valley	24	24	139.2	237	209	175	8.77
899.0 5	Desert	35	35	213.1	296	237	173	5.68
984.0 6	San Diego Mesa	40	40	224.2	228	176	131	4.08
892.0 7	San Diego City	32	32	199.2	229	167	110	3.86
1127.0 8	Southwestern	43	43	267.2	275	135	95	2.48
1307.0 9	Palomar	48	48	295.0	207	84	75	1.78

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	48	304	7.21	10	1.02
1127.0 2	Southwestern	43	43	125	3.27	8	-
984.0 3	San Diego Mesa	40	40	126	3.93	0	-
899.0 4	Desert	35	35	132	4.33	9	-
894.0 5	Grossmont	35	35	92	3.24	10	-
892.0 6	San Diego City	32	32	90	3.16	2	-
744.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	34	34	60	2.38	14	-
601.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	24	37	1.85	2	-
564.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	26	26	20	1.06	8	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	1127	875	224	28	3	.975
899.0 2	Desert	35	940	635	257	48	17	.949
1127.0 3	Southwestern	43	1317	799	445	73	6	.945
984.0 4	San Diego Mesa	40	1055	676	315	64	13	.939
892.0 5	San Diego City	32	1006	597	345	64	15	.936
601.0 6	Imperial Valley	24	600	378	179	43	11	.928
894.0 7	Grossmont	35	865	573	225	67	29	.923
564.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	26	665	398	213	54	16	.919
744.0 9	San Bernardino Valley	34	848	502	217	129	14	.848

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
1307.0 1	Palomar	48	7	21	8	.276	-
892.0 2	San Diego City	32	11	52	11	.175	1
1127.0 3	Southwestern	43	22	28	5	.152	-
984.0 4	San Diego Mesa	40	8	54	8	.129	0
894.0 5	Grossmont	35	7	106	11	.094	0
564.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	26	7	38	3	.073	-
899.0 7	Desert	35	14	69	5	.068	-
744.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	34	5	101	5	.047	-
601.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	3	52	2	.037	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
899.0 1	Desert	22.0	1,716	78
1307.0 2	Palomar	24.0	1,150	48
892.0 3	San Diego City	14.0	570	41
564.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	10.0	257	26
984.0 5	San Diego Mesa	19.0	400	22
1127.0 6	Southwestern	24.0	207	9
744.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	8.0	55	7
894.0 8	Grossmont	15.0	25	2
601.0 9	Imperial Valley	14.0	10	1

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
409.0 1	Palomar	16	409	178	160	60	16	.435	.517	.672
413.0 2	Southwestern	16	413	160	115	46	22	.387	.453	.511
416.0 3	San Diego Mesa	16	416	168	112	66	40	.404	.488	.536
388.0 4	Desert	16	388	122	66	34	68	.314	.376	.430
438.0 5	Grossmont	16	438	153	95	35	58	.349	.402	.475
464.0 6	San Diego City	16	464	168	103	51	57	.362	.427	.463
312.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	16	312	63	33	40	78	.202	.303	.272
388.0 8	Imperial Valley	16	388	125	62	32	53	.322	.380	.407
360.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	16	360	79	44	51	59	.219	.346	.272

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
409.0 1	Palomar	16	46	15	7	68
416.0 2	San Diego Mesa	16	32	7	3	42
388.0 3	Desert	16	30	6	1	37
413.0 4	Southwestern	16	26	11	1	38
464.0 5	San Diego City	16	32	6	1	39
438.0 6	Grossmont	16	34	9	1	44
388.0 7	Imperial Valley	16	25	4	-	29
312.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	16	17	1	1	19
360.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	16	12	2	1	15

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
409.0 1	Palomar	16	171	275	34	1
416.0 2	San Diego Mesa	16	132	223	28	4
413.0 3	Southwestern	16	128	211	22	1
388.0 4	Desert	16	77	167	14	2
464.0 5	San Diego City	16	122	215	54	2
438.0 6	Grossmont	16	123	208	26	6
388.0 7	Imperial Valley	16	81	158	12	7
312.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	16	42	85	16	5
360.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	16	56	98	25	6

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
409.0 1	Palomar	16	18	8	6	6	126	64	1.97	501
413.0 2	Southwestern	16	9	7	16	5	107	108	.99	491
416.0 3	San Diego Mesa	16	6	4	17	8	102	95	1.07	509
388.0 4	Desert	16	7	5	4	5	92	79	1.16	438
464.0 5	San Diego City	16	6	6	10	2	110	105	1.05	537
438.0 6	Grossmont	16	5	2	12	5	131	67	1.96	492
312.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	16	6	2	7	2	79	47	1.68	367
388.0 8	Imperial Valley	16	6	3	14	1	64	46	1.39	443
360.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	16	20	2	14	5	95	70	1.36	447

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
312.0 1	San Bernardino Valley	16	16	80.0	224	205	152	13.30
360.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	16	16	84.1	189	146	127	10.54
438.0 3	Grossmont	16	16	92.2	174	152	129	9.74
388.0 4	Imperial Valley	16	16	91.2	172	146	127	9.70
388.0 4	Desert	16	16	91.1	121	94	78	5.98
416.0 6	San Diego Mesa	16	16	93.2	96	67	48	3.59
464.0 7	San Diego City	16	16	101.2	115	77	47	3.24
413.0 8	Southwestern	16	16	91.0	80	25	19	1.46
409.0 9	Palomar	16	16	87.0	42	12	10	0.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
409.0 1	Palomar	16	16	129	10.38	1	0.70
413.0 2	Southwestern	16	16	52	4.00	-	-
416.0 3	San Diego Mesa	16	16	58	4.33	-	-
388.0 4	Desert	16	16	51	3.91	3	-
438.0 5	Grossmont	16	16	54	4.08	4	-
464.0 6	San Diego City	16	16	47	3.24	1	-
312.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	16	16	24	2.10	6	-
388.0 8	Imperial Valley	16	16	23	1.76	1	-
360.0 9	Mt. San Jacinto	16	16	12	1.00	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
409.0 1	Palomar	16	315	251	58	6	-	.981
388.0 2	Desert	16	404	269	115	20	2	.950
413.0 3	Southwestern	16	444	273	157	14	1	.968
416.0 4	San Diego Mesa	16	447	276	139	32	1	.928
464.0 5	San Diego City	16	508	303	174	31	12	.939
388.0 6	Imperial Valley	16	393	251	112	30	4	.924
438.0 7	Grossmont	16	400	275	101	24	15	.940
360.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	16	433	263	138	32	10	.926
312.0 9	San Bernardino Valley	16	400	232	100	68	10	.830

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
409.0 1	Palomar	16	1	3	3	.500	-
464.0 2	San Diego City	16	5	19	6	.240	-
413.0 3	Southwestern	16	7	5	1	.167	-
416.0 4	San Diego Mesa	16	6	11	3	.214	-
438.0 5	Grossmont	16	1	53	8	.131	-
360.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	16	5	26	3	.103	-
388.0 7	Desert	16	9	31	2	.061	-
312.0 8	San Bernardino Valley	16	3	44	0	.000	-
388.0 9	Imperial Valley	16	2	39	2	.049	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
388.0 1	Desert	7.0	546	78
409.0 2	Palomar	8.0	400	50
464.0 3	San Diego City	8.0	340	43
360.0 4	Mt. San Jacinto	8.0	199	25
416.0 5	San Diego Mesa	8.0	400	50
413.0 6	Southwestern	8.0	0	0
312.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	6.0	55	9
438.0 8	Grossmont	8.0	25	4
388.0 9	Imperial Valley	8.0	10	1