Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
139.0 1 San Bernardino Valley 34 744 183 105 90 139 .246 .339 .319
128.0 2 Grossmont 35 894 277 142 85 128 .310 .374 .400
115.0 3 San Diego City 32 892 298 170 76 115 .334 .386 .433
113.0 4 Desert 35 899 302 176 71 113 .336 .400 .472
104.0 5 San Diego Mesa 40 984 349 235 142 104 .355 .445 .512
94.0 6 Southwestern 43 1127 368 215 97 94 .327 .389 .430
90.0 7 Mt. San Jacinto 26 564 124 59 65 90 .220 .325 .271
87.0 8 Palomar 48 1307 496 347 129 87 .379 .443 .552
70.0 9 Imperial Valley 24 601 195 95 48 70 .324 .382 .414
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
87.0 1 Palomar 48 104 28 22 154
104.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 70 14 19 103
113.0 3 Desert 35 69 13 9 91
94.0 4 Southwestern 43 51 24 6 81
115.0 5 San Diego City 32 59 10 3 72
128.0 6 Grossmont 35 53 11 2 66
70.0 7 Imperial Valley 24 40 7 - 47
139.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 33 3 5 41
90.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 17 3 2 22
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
87.0 1 Palomar 48 376 722 61 3
104.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 281 504 54 11
94.0 3 Southwestern 43 241 485 45 4
113.0 4 Desert 35 210 424 47 7
115.0 5 San Diego City 32 204 386 99 6
128.0 6 Grossmont 35 184 358 37 8
70.0 7 Imperial Valley 24 133 249 25 8
139.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 130 237 45 16
90.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 73 153 39 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
87.0 1 Palomar 48 32 14 32 18 380 309 1.23 1514
94.0 2 Southwestern 43 23 9 48 13 346 305 1.13 1304
104.0 3 San Diego Mesa 40 23 6 36 12 277 219 1.26 1191
113.0 4 Desert 35 31 10 19 17 245 204 1.20 1030
115.0 5 San Diego City 32 9 14 24 3 220 229 .96 1015
128.0 6 Grossmont 35 8 2 18 12 266 147 1.81 1007
139.0 7 San Bernardino Valley 34 17 5 17 7 227 122 1.86 873
70.0 8 Imperial Valley 24 12 6 18 3 75 53 1.42 685
90.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 24 2 20 7 141 96 1.47 675
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
139.0 1 San Bernardino Valley 34 34 176.2 443 396 294 11.65
90.0 2 Mt. San Jacinto 26 26 132.1 298 237 204 10.79
128.0 3 Grossmont 35 35 199.0 371 324 261 9.18
70.0 4 Imperial Valley 24 24 139.2 237 209 175 8.77
113.0 5 Desert 35 35 213.1 296 237 173 5.68
104.0 6 San Diego Mesa 40 40 224.2 228 176 131 4.08
115.0 7 San Diego City 32 32 199.2 229 167 110 3.86
94.0 8 Southwestern 43 43 267.2 275 135 95 2.48
87.0 9 Palomar 48 48 295.0 207 84 75 1.78
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
87.0 1 Palomar 48 48 304 7.21 10 1.02
70.0 2 Imperial Valley 24 24 37 1.85 2 -
90.0 3 Mt. San Jacinto 26 26 20 1.06 8 -
94.0 4 Southwestern 43 43 125 3.27 8 -
104.0 5 San Diego Mesa 40 40 126 3.93 0 -
113.0 6 Desert 35 35 132 4.33 9 -
115.0 7 San Diego City 32 32 90 3.16 2 -
128.0 8 Grossmont 35 35 92 3.24 10 -
139.0 9 San Bernardino Valley 34 34 60 2.38 14 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
87.0 1 Palomar 48 1127 875 224 28 3 .975
113.0 2 Desert 35 940 635 257 48 17 .949
94.0 3 Southwestern 43 1317 799 445 73 6 .945
104.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 1055 676 315 64 13 .939
115.0 5 San Diego City 32 1006 597 345 64 15 .936
70.0 6 Imperial Valley 24 600 378 179 43 11 .928
128.0 7 Grossmont 35 865 573 225 67 29 .923
90.0 8 Mt. San Jacinto 26 665 398 213 54 16 .919
139.0 9 San Bernardino Valley 34 848 502 217 129 14 .848
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
87.0 1 Palomar 48 7 21 8 .276 -
115.0 2 San Diego City 32 11 52 11 .175 1
94.0 3 Southwestern 43 22 28 5 .152 -
104.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 8 54 8 .129 0
128.0 5 Grossmont 35 7 106 11 .094 0
90.0 6 Mt. San Jacinto 26 7 38 3 .073 -
113.0 7 Desert 35 14 69 5 .068 -
139.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 5 101 5 .047 -
70.0 9 Imperial Valley 24 3 52 2 .037 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
113.0 1 Desert 22.0 1,716 78
87.0 2 Palomar 24.0 1,150 48
115.0 3 San Diego City 14.0 570 41
90.0 4 Mt. San Jacinto 10.0 257 26
104.0 5 San Diego Mesa 19.0 400 22
94.0 6 Southwestern 24.0 207 9
139.0 7 San Bernardino Valley 8.0 55 7
128.0 8 Grossmont 15.0 25 2
70.0 9 Imperial Valley 14.0 10 1
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
78.0 1 San Bernardino Valley 16 312 63 33 40 78 .202 .303 .272
58.0 2 Grossmont 16 438 153 95 35 58 .349 .402 .475
57.0 3 San Diego City 16 464 168 103 51 57 .362 .427 .463
68.0 4 Desert 16 388 122 66 34 68 .314 .376 .430
40.0 5 San Diego Mesa 16 416 168 112 66 40 .404 .488 .536
22.0 6 Southwestern 16 413 160 115 46 22 .387 .453 .511
59.0 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 360 79 44 51 59 .219 .346 .272
16.0 8 Palomar 16 409 178 160 60 16 .435 .517 .672
53.0 9 Imperial Valley 16 388 125 62 32 53 .322 .380 .407
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
16.0 1 Palomar 16 46 15 7 68
40.0 2 San Diego Mesa 16 32 7 3 42
68.0 3 Desert 16 30 6 1 37
22.0 4 Southwestern 16 26 11 1 38
57.0 5 San Diego City 16 32 6 1 39
58.0 6 Grossmont 16 34 9 1 44
53.0 7 Imperial Valley 16 25 4 - 29
78.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 17 1 1 19
59.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 12 2 1 15
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
16.0 1 Palomar 16 171 275 34 1
40.0 2 San Diego Mesa 16 132 223 28 4
22.0 3 Southwestern 16 128 211 22 1
68.0 4 Desert 16 77 167 14 2
57.0 5 San Diego City 16 122 215 54 2
58.0 6 Grossmont 16 123 208 26 6
53.0 7 Imperial Valley 16 81 158 12 7
78.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 42 85 16 5
59.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 56 98 25 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
16.0 1 Palomar 16 18 8 6 6 126 64 1.97 501
22.0 2 Southwestern 16 9 7 16 5 107 108 .99 491
40.0 3 San Diego Mesa 16 6 4 17 8 102 95 1.07 509
68.0 4 Desert 16 7 5 4 5 92 79 1.16 438
57.0 5 San Diego City 16 6 6 10 2 110 105 1.05 537
58.0 6 Grossmont 16 5 2 12 5 131 67 1.96 492
78.0 7 San Bernardino Valley 16 6 2 7 2 79 47 1.68 367
53.0 8 Imperial Valley 16 6 3 14 1 64 46 1.39 443
59.0 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 20 2 14 5 95 70 1.36 447
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
78.0 1 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 80.0 224 205 152 13.30
59.0 2 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 84.1 189 146 127 10.54
58.0 3 Grossmont 16 16 92.2 174 152 129 9.74
53.0 4 Imperial Valley 16 16 91.2 172 146 127 9.70
68.0 5 Desert 16 16 91.1 121 94 78 5.98
40.0 6 San Diego Mesa 16 16 93.2 96 67 48 3.59
57.0 7 San Diego City 16 16 101.2 115 77 47 3.24
22.0 8 Southwestern 16 16 91.0 80 25 19 1.46
16.0 9 Palomar 16 16 87.0 42 12 10 0.80
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
16.0 1 Palomar 16 16 129 10.38 1 0.70
53.0 2 Imperial Valley 16 16 23 1.76 1 -
59.0 3 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 12 1.00 - -
22.0 4 Southwestern 16 16 52 4.00 - -
40.0 5 San Diego Mesa 16 16 58 4.33 - -
68.0 6 Desert 16 16 51 3.91 3 -
57.0 7 San Diego City 16 16 47 3.24 1 -
58.0 8 Grossmont 16 16 54 4.08 4 -
78.0 9 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 24 2.10 6 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
16.0 1 Palomar 16 315 251 58 6 - .981
68.0 2 Desert 16 404 269 115 20 2 .950
22.0 3 Southwestern 16 444 273 157 14 1 .968
40.0 4 San Diego Mesa 16 447 276 139 32 1 .928
57.0 5 San Diego City 16 508 303 174 31 12 .939
53.0 6 Imperial Valley 16 393 251 112 30 4 .924
58.0 7 Grossmont 16 400 275 101 24 15 .940
59.0 8 Mt. San Jacinto 16 433 263 138 32 10 .926
78.0 9 San Bernardino Valley 16 400 232 100 68 10 .830
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
16.0 1 Palomar 16 1 3 3 .500 -
57.0 2 San Diego City 16 5 19 6 .240 -
22.0 3 Southwestern 16 7 5 1 .167 -
40.0 4 San Diego Mesa 16 6 11 3 .214 -
58.0 5 Grossmont 16 1 53 8 .131 -
59.0 6 Mt. San Jacinto 16 5 26 3 .103 -
68.0 7 Desert 16 9 31 2 .061 -
78.0 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 3 44 0 .000 -
53.0 9 Imperial Valley 16 2 39 2 .049 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
68.0 1 Desert 7.0 546 78
16.0 2 Palomar 8.0 400 50
57.0 3 San Diego City 8.0 340 43
59.0 4 Mt. San Jacinto 8.0 199 25
40.0 5 San Diego Mesa 8.0 400 50
22.0 6 Southwestern 8.0 0 0
78.0 7 San Bernardino Valley 6.0 55 9
58.0 8 Grossmont 8.0 25 4
53.0 9 Imperial Valley 8.0 10 1