Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
48.0 1 Palomar 48 1307 496 347 129 87 .379 .443 .552
22.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 984 349 235 142 104 .355 .445 .512
78.0 3 Desert 35 899 302 176 71 113 .336 .400 .472
40.714285714285715 4 San Diego City 32 892 298 170 76 115 .334 .386 .433
9.0 5 Southwestern 43 1127 368 215 97 94 .327 .389 .430
0.7142857142857143 6 Imperial Valley 24 601 195 95 48 70 .324 .382 .414
2.0 7 Grossmont 35 894 277 142 85 128 .310 .374 .400
6.875 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 744 183 105 90 139 .246 .339 .319
25.7 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 564 124 59 65 90 .220 .325 .271
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
48.0 1 Palomar 48 104 28 22 154
22.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 70 14 19 103
78.0 3 Desert 35 69 13 9 91
9.0 4 Southwestern 43 51 24 6 81
40.714285714285715 5 San Diego City 32 59 10 3 72
2.0 6 Grossmont 35 53 11 2 66
0.7142857142857143 7 Imperial Valley 24 40 7 - 47
6.875 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 33 3 5 41
25.7 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 17 3 2 22
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
48.0 1 Palomar 48 376 722 61 3
22.0 2 San Diego Mesa 40 281 504 54 11
9.0 3 Southwestern 43 241 485 45 4
78.0 4 Desert 35 210 424 47 7
40.714285714285715 5 San Diego City 32 204 386 99 6
2.0 6 Grossmont 35 184 358 37 8
0.7142857142857143 7 Imperial Valley 24 133 249 25 8
6.875 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 130 237 45 16
25.7 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 73 153 39 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
48.0 1 Palomar 48 32 14 32 18 380 309 1.23 1514
9.0 2 Southwestern 43 23 9 48 13 346 305 1.13 1304
22.0 3 San Diego Mesa 40 23 6 36 12 277 219 1.26 1191
78.0 4 Desert 35 31 10 19 17 245 204 1.20 1030
40.714285714285715 5 San Diego City 32 9 14 24 3 220 229 .96 1015
2.0 6 Grossmont 35 8 2 18 12 266 147 1.81 1007
6.875 7 San Bernardino Valley 34 17 5 17 7 227 122 1.86 873
0.7142857142857143 8 Imperial Valley 24 12 6 18 3 75 53 1.42 685
25.7 9 Mt. San Jacinto 26 24 2 20 7 141 96 1.47 675
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.875 1 San Bernardino Valley 34 34 176.2 443 396 294 11.65
25.7 2 Mt. San Jacinto 26 26 132.1 298 237 204 10.79
2.0 3 Grossmont 35 35 199.0 371 324 261 9.18
0.7142857142857143 4 Imperial Valley 24 24 139.2 237 209 175 8.77
78.0 5 Desert 35 35 213.1 296 237 173 5.68
22.0 6 San Diego Mesa 40 40 224.2 228 176 131 4.08
40.714285714285715 7 San Diego City 32 32 199.2 229 167 110 3.86
9.0 8 Southwestern 43 43 267.2 275 135 95 2.48
48.0 9 Palomar 48 48 295.0 207 84 75 1.78
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
48.0 1 Palomar 48 48 304 7.21 10 1.02
78.0 2 Desert 35 35 132 4.33 9 -
40.714285714285715 3 San Diego City 32 32 90 3.16 2 -
25.7 4 Mt. San Jacinto 26 26 20 1.06 8 -
22.0 5 San Diego Mesa 40 40 126 3.93 0 -
9.0 6 Southwestern 43 43 125 3.27 8 -
6.875 7 San Bernardino Valley 34 34 60 2.38 14 -
2.0 8 Grossmont 35 35 92 3.24 10 -
0.7142857142857143 9 Imperial Valley 24 24 37 1.85 2 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
48.0 1 Palomar 48 1127 875 224 28 3 .975
78.0 2 Desert 35 940 635 257 48 17 .949
9.0 3 Southwestern 43 1317 799 445 73 6 .945
22.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 1055 676 315 64 13 .939
40.714285714285715 5 San Diego City 32 1006 597 345 64 15 .936
0.7142857142857143 6 Imperial Valley 24 600 378 179 43 11 .928
2.0 7 Grossmont 35 865 573 225 67 29 .923
25.7 8 Mt. San Jacinto 26 665 398 213 54 16 .919
6.875 9 San Bernardino Valley 34 848 502 217 129 14 .848
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
48.0 1 Palomar 48 7 21 8 .276 -
40.714285714285715 2 San Diego City 32 11 52 11 .175 1
9.0 3 Southwestern 43 22 28 5 .152 -
22.0 4 San Diego Mesa 40 8 54 8 .129 0
2.0 5 Grossmont 35 7 106 11 .094 0
25.7 6 Mt. San Jacinto 26 7 38 3 .073 -
78.0 7 Desert 35 14 69 5 .068 -
6.875 8 San Bernardino Valley 34 5 101 5 .047 -
0.7142857142857143 9 Imperial Valley 24 3 52 2 .037 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
78.0 1 Desert 22.0 1,716 78
48.0 2 Palomar 24.0 1,150 48
40.714285714285715 3 San Diego City 14.0 570 41
25.7 4 Mt. San Jacinto 10.0 257 26
22.0 5 San Diego Mesa 19.0 400 22
9.0 6 Southwestern 24.0 207 9
6.875 7 San Bernardino Valley 8.0 55 7
2.0 8 Grossmont 15.0 25 2
0.7142857142857143 9 Imperial Valley 14.0 10 1
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
50.0 1 Palomar 16 409 178 160 60 16 .435 .517 .672
50.0 1 San Diego Mesa 16 416 168 112 66 40 .404 .488 .536
78.0 3 Desert 16 388 122 66 34 68 .314 .376 .430
42.5 4 San Diego City 16 464 168 103 51 57 .362 .427 .463
0.0 5 Southwestern 16 413 160 115 46 22 .387 .453 .511
1.25 6 Imperial Valley 16 388 125 62 32 53 .322 .380 .407
4.0 7 Grossmont 16 438 153 95 35 58 .349 .402 .475
9.166666666666666 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 312 63 33 40 78 .202 .303 .272
24.875 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 360 79 44 51 59 .219 .346 .272
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
50.0 1 Palomar 16 46 15 7 68
50.0 1 San Diego Mesa 16 32 7 3 42
78.0 3 Desert 16 30 6 1 37
0.0 4 Southwestern 16 26 11 1 38
42.5 5 San Diego City 16 32 6 1 39
4.0 6 Grossmont 16 34 9 1 44
1.25 7 Imperial Valley 16 25 4 - 29
9.166666666666666 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 17 1 1 19
24.875 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 12 2 1 15
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
50.0 1 Palomar 16 171 275 34 1
50.0 1 San Diego Mesa 16 132 223 28 4
0.0 3 Southwestern 16 128 211 22 1
78.0 4 Desert 16 77 167 14 2
42.5 5 San Diego City 16 122 215 54 2
4.0 6 Grossmont 16 123 208 26 6
1.25 7 Imperial Valley 16 81 158 12 7
9.166666666666666 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 42 85 16 5
24.875 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 56 98 25 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
50.0 1 Palomar 16 18 8 6 6 126 64 1.97 501
0.0 2 Southwestern 16 9 7 16 5 107 108 .99 491
50.0 3 San Diego Mesa 16 6 4 17 8 102 95 1.07 509
78.0 4 Desert 16 7 5 4 5 92 79 1.16 438
42.5 5 San Diego City 16 6 6 10 2 110 105 1.05 537
4.0 6 Grossmont 16 5 2 12 5 131 67 1.96 492
9.166666666666666 7 San Bernardino Valley 16 6 2 7 2 79 47 1.68 367
1.25 8 Imperial Valley 16 6 3 14 1 64 46 1.39 443
24.875 9 Mt. San Jacinto 16 20 2 14 5 95 70 1.36 447
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
9.166666666666666 1 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 80.0 224 205 152 13.30
24.875 2 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 84.1 189 146 127 10.54
4.0 3 Grossmont 16 16 92.2 174 152 129 9.74
1.25 4 Imperial Valley 16 16 91.2 172 146 127 9.70
78.0 5 Desert 16 16 91.1 121 94 78 5.98
50.0 6 San Diego Mesa 16 16 93.2 96 67 48 3.59
42.5 7 San Diego City 16 16 101.2 115 77 47 3.24
0.0 8 Southwestern 16 16 91.0 80 25 19 1.46
50.0 9 Palomar 16 16 87.0 42 12 10 0.80
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
50.0 1 Palomar 16 16 129 10.38 1 0.70
78.0 2 Desert 16 16 51 3.91 3 -
42.5 3 San Diego City 16 16 47 3.24 1 -
24.875 4 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 12 1.00 - -
50.0 5 San Diego Mesa 16 16 58 4.33 - -
0.0 6 Southwestern 16 16 52 4.00 - -
9.166666666666666 7 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 24 2.10 6 -
4.0 8 Grossmont 16 16 54 4.08 4 -
1.25 9 Imperial Valley 16 16 23 1.76 1 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
50.0 1 Palomar 16 315 251 58 6 - .981
78.0 2 Desert 16 404 269 115 20 2 .950
0.0 3 Southwestern 16 444 273 157 14 1 .968
50.0 4 San Diego Mesa 16 447 276 139 32 1 .928
42.5 5 San Diego City 16 508 303 174 31 12 .939
1.25 6 Imperial Valley 16 393 251 112 30 4 .924
4.0 7 Grossmont 16 400 275 101 24 15 .940
24.875 8 Mt. San Jacinto 16 433 263 138 32 10 .926
9.166666666666666 9 San Bernardino Valley 16 400 232 100 68 10 .830
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
50.0 1 Palomar 16 1 3 3 .500 -
42.5 2 San Diego City 16 5 19 6 .240 -
0.0 3 Southwestern 16 7 5 1 .167 -
50.0 4 San Diego Mesa 16 6 11 3 .214 -
4.0 5 Grossmont 16 1 53 8 .131 -
24.875 6 Mt. San Jacinto 16 5 26 3 .103 -
78.0 7 Desert 16 9 31 2 .061 -
9.166666666666666 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 3 44 0 .000 -
1.25 9 Imperial Valley 16 2 39 2 .049 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
78.0 1 Desert 7.0 546 78
50.0 2 Palomar 8.0 400 50
42.5 3 San Diego City 8.0 340 43
24.875 4 Mt. San Jacinto 8.0 199 25
50.0 5 San Diego Mesa 8.0 400 50
0.0 6 Southwestern 8.0 0 0
9.166666666666666 7 San Bernardino Valley 6.0 55 9
4.0 8 Grossmont 8.0 25 4
1.25 9 Imperial Valley 8.0 10 1