Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.33189282627484873 1 Reedley 44 1157 384 212 133 96 .332 .407 .430
0.30358874878758485 2 Merced 39 1031 313 194 133 131 .304 .387 .403
0.2955112219451372 3 Cerro Coso 36 802 237 119 53 160 .296 .356 .400
0.294468085106383 4 Sequoias 44 1175 346 196 95 134 .294 .360 .426
0.2917046490428441 5 Porterville 41 1097 320 207 160 176 .292 .388 .447
0.28893058161350843 6 Fresno City 41 1066 308 208 134 95 .289 .379 .438
0.2701092353525323 7 Taft 40 1007 272 178 101 166 .270 .356 .399
0.23323615160349853 8 Coalinga 29 686 160 75 76 118 .233 .316 .289
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
102.0 1 Fresno City 41 70 7 25 102
102.0 1 Porterville 41 66 4 32 102
98.0 3 Sequoias 44 65 10 23 98
82.0 4 Reedley 44 60 12 10 82
76.0 5 Taft 40 47 4 25 76
72.0 6 Merced 39 45 23 4 72
58.0 7 Cerro Coso 36 37 16 5 58
26.0 8 Coalinga 29 18 4 4 26
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
263.0 1 Reedley 44 263 498 90 11
246.0 2 Fresno City 41 246 467 61 9
241.0 3 Porterville 41 241 490 17 5
240.0 4 Taft 40 240 402 47 6
238.0 5 Sequoias 44 238 500 24 14
211.0 6 Merced 39 211 416 52 8
145.0 7 Cerro Coso 36 145 321 89 21
92.0 8 Coalinga 29 92 198 17 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1358.0 1 Sequoias 44 30 8 50 2 248 235 1.06 1358
1355.0 2 Reedley 44 20 8 37 7 277 231 1.20 1355
1319.0 3 Porterville 41 18 10 34 1 135 151 .89 1319
1281.0 4 Fresno City 41 31 16 34 1 60 88 .68 1281
1193.0 5 Merced 39 12 7 10 5 230 226 1.02 1193
1170.0 6 Taft 40 39 9 14 5 84 108 .78 1170
896.0 7 Cerro Coso 36 24 3 14 4 175 129 1.36 896
777.0 8 Coalinga 29 7 1 7 4 42 45 .93 777
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
14.220779220779223 1 Cerro Coso 36 36 179.2 347 463 365 14.22
7.476190476190476 2 Coalinga 29 29 147.0 265 258 157 7.48
6.979680696661829 3 Taft 40 40 229.2 382 302 229 6.98
4.410292072322671 4 Merced 39 39 239.2 280 165 151 4.41
4.244979919678714 5 Fresno City 41 41 249.0 317 191 151 4.24
3.168797953964194 6 Porterville 41 41 260.2 318 159 118 3.17
2.1077111383108935 7 Sequoias 44 44 272.1 227 109 82 2.11
2.0481786133960047 8 Reedley 44 44 283.2 230 109 83 2.05
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.6512059369202228 1 Cerro Coso 36 36 93 3.62 13 3.65
2.4829931972789114 2 Coalinga 29 29 69 3.29 10 2.48
2.251088534107402 3 Taft 40 40 65 1.98 22 2.25
1.6626506024096386 4 Fresno City 41 41 95 2.67 22 1.66
1.4979137691237832 5 Merced 39 39 141 4.12 12 1.50
1.4117647058823528 6 Porterville 41 41 81 2.18 13 1.41
1.1386603995299647 7 Reedley 44 44 244 6.02 15 1.14
1.0648714810281519 8 Sequoias 44 44 169 4.34 9 1.06
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9606791778373548 1 Reedley 44 1119 819 256 44 9 .961
0.9579037800687286 2 Sequoias 44 1164 819 296 49 12 .958
0.9556485355648535 3 Porterville 41 1195 778 364 53 13 .956
0.9506276150627615 4 Fresno City 41 1195 771 365 59 4 .951
0.950592885375494 5 Merced 39 1012 700 262 50 5 .951
0.925476603119584 6 Taft 40 1154 714 354 86 37 .925
0.9000960614793467 7 Coalinga 29 1041 480 457 104 24 .900
0.9 8 Cerro Coso 36 870 539 244 87 28 .900
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3684210526315789 1 Reedley 44 1 24 14 .368 0
0.21428571428571427 2 Taft 40 10 44 12 .214 0
0.16666666666666666 3 Cerro Coso 36 7 80 16 .167 0
0.15 4 Fresno City 41 6 34 6 .150 0
0.140625 5 Merced 39 5 55 9 .141 0
0.08163265306122448 6 Porterville 41 5 45 4 .082 0
0.058823529411764705 7 Sequoias 44 4 48 3 .059 1
0.02702702702702703 8 Coalinga 29 1 72 2 .027 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
30969.0 1 Cerro Coso 15.0 464,530 30,969
87.0 2 Reedley 21.0 1,810 87
48.0 3 Sequoias 19.0 900 48
0.0 4 Coalinga 16.0 0 0
0.0 4 Fresno City 23.0 0 0
0.0 4 Merced 20.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 15.0 0 0
0 8 Taft 18.0 - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3500897666068223 1 Reedley 21 557 195 111 71 34 .350 .428 .469
0.3327526132404181 2 Merced 21 574 191 126 86 65 .333 .425 .444
0.27713625866050806 3 Cerro Coso 21 433 120 49 29 104 .277 .335 .386
0.3628472222222222 4 Sequoias 21 576 209 140 54 50 .363 .436 .538
0.26714801444043323 5 Porterville 21 554 148 93 91 91 .267 .377 .392
0.31115107913669066 6 Fresno City 21 556 173 144 90 46 .311 .416 .500
0.22764227642276422 7 Taft 21 492 112 81 45 98 .228 .308 .348
0.21041666666666667 8 Coalinga 21 480 101 54 61 90 .210 .308 .267
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
70.0 1 Fresno City 21 49 7 14 70
43.0 2 Porterville 21 30 0 13 43
62.0 3 Sequoias 21 40 5 17 62
47.0 4 Reedley 21 34 7 6 47
32.0 5 Taft 21 18 1 13 32
44.0 6 Merced 21 27 14 3 44
33.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 22 8 3 33
19.0 8 Coalinga 21 14 2 3 19
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
142.0 1 Reedley 21 142 261 48 5
165.0 2 Fresno City 21 165 278 27 2
114.0 3 Porterville 21 114 217 12 3
100.0 4 Taft 21 100 171 27 4
170.0 5 Sequoias 21 170 310 10 9
137.0 6 Merced 21 137 255 34 4
67.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 67 167 43 17
65.0 8 Coalinga 21 65 128 14 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
681.0 1 Sequoias 21 23 3 25 2 85 141 .60 681
663.0 2 Reedley 21 9 5 21 4 124 109 1.14 663
683.0 3 Porterville 21 11 7 20 - 47 53 .89 683
697.0 4 Fresno City 21 18 11 22 - 36 67 .54 697
682.0 5 Merced 21 9 4 9 3 90 115 .78 682
567.0 6 Taft 21 14 4 12 - 28 46 .61 567
477.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 9 0 6 2 60 57 1.05 477
554.0 8 Coalinga 21 7 1 5 3 26 29 .90 554
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
14.511627906976745 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 100.1 192 269 208 14.51
6.614678899082569 2 Coalinga 21 21 109.0 194 182 103 6.61
7.24931506849315 3 Taft 21 21 121.2 201 169 126 7.25
3.9477806788511742 4 Merced 21 21 127.2 137 79 72 3.95
3.1578947368421053 5 Fresno City 21 21 133.0 153 80 60 3.16
2.625 6 Porterville 21 21 138.2 159 69 52 2.63
1.4390862944162435 7 Sequoias 21 21 131.1 95 44 27 1.44
1.9185185185185185 8 Reedley 21 21 135.0 96 47 37 1.92
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.7574750830564785 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 54 3.77 11 3.76
2.376146788990826 2 Coalinga 21 21 53 3.40 9 2.38
2.350684931506849 3 Taft 21 21 38 2.19 13 2.35
1.5413533834586466 4 Fresno City 21 21 58 3.05 12 1.54
1.4569190600522193 5 Merced 21 21 91 4.99 6 1.46
1.3197115384615385 6 Porterville 21 21 42 2.12 5 1.32
0.9925925925925926 7 Reedley 21 21 143 7.41 11 0.99
0.8908629441624365 8 Sequoias 21 21 89 4.74 4 0.89
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9735849056603774 1 Reedley 21 530 410 106 14 6 .974
0.9507640067911715 2 Sequoias 21 589 397 163 29 7 .951
0.9557926829268293 3 Porterville 21 656 421 206 29 7 .956
0.9475308641975309 4 Fresno City 21 648 404 210 34 2 .948
0.9522058823529411 5 Merced 21 544 374 144 26 4 .952
0.928462709284627 6 Taft 21 657 377 233 47 19 .928
0.8949320148331273 7 Coalinga 21 809 373 351 85 24 .895
0.896414342629482 8 Cerro Coso 21 502 304 146 52 19 .896
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.375 1 Reedley 21 1 10 6 .375 0
0.2647058823529412 2 Taft 21 5 25 9 .265 0
0.1694915254237288 3 Cerro Coso 21 4 49 10 .169 0
0.25 4 Fresno City 21 3 15 5 .250 0
0.1875 5 Merced 21 2 26 6 .188 0
0.03571428571428571 6 Porterville 21 2 27 1 .036 0
0.08695652173913043 7 Sequoias 21 3 21 2 .087 0
0.045454545454545456 8 Coalinga 21 1 42 2 .045 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
33337.0 1 Cerro Coso 10.0 333,368 33,337
90.0 2 Reedley 12.0 1,074 90
50.0 3 Sequoias 11.0 550 50
0.0 4 Coalinga 12.0 0 0
0 5 Fresno City 10.0 - -
0.0 6 Merced 10.0 0 0
0.0 6 Porterville 10.0 0 0
0 8 Taft 9.0 - -