Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
12.0 1 Reedley 44 1157 384 212 133 96 .332 .407 .430
23.0 2 Merced 39 1031 313 194 133 131 .304 .387 .403
16.0 3 Cerro Coso 36 802 237 119 53 160 .296 .356 .400
10.0 4 Sequoias 44 1175 346 196 95 134 .294 .360 .426
4.0 5 Porterville 41 1097 320 207 160 176 .292 .388 .447
7.0 6 Fresno City 41 1066 308 208 134 95 .289 .379 .438
4.0 7 Taft 40 1007 272 178 101 166 .270 .356 .399
4.0 7 West Hills Coalinga 29 686 160 75 76 118 .233 .316 .289
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
23.0 1 Merced 39 45 23 4 72
16.0 2 Cerro Coso 36 37 16 5 58
12.0 3 Reedley 44 60 12 10 82
10.0 4 Sequoias 44 65 10 23 98
7.0 5 Fresno City 41 70 7 25 102
4.0 6 Porterville 41 66 4 32 102
4.0 6 Taft 40 47 4 25 76
4.0 6 West Hills Coalinga 29 18 4 4 26
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
12.0 1 Reedley 44 263 498 90 11
7.0 2 Fresno City 41 246 467 61 9
4.0 3 Porterville 41 241 490 17 5
4.0 3 Taft 40 240 402 47 6
10.0 5 Sequoias 44 238 500 24 14
23.0 6 Merced 39 211 416 52 8
16.0 7 Cerro Coso 36 145 321 89 21
4.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 29 92 198 17 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
10.0 1 Sequoias 44 30 8 50 2 248 235 1.06 1358
12.0 2 Reedley 44 20 8 37 7 277 231 1.20 1355
4.0 3 Porterville 41 18 10 34 1 135 151 .89 1319
7.0 4 Fresno City 41 31 16 34 1 60 88 .68 1281
23.0 5 Merced 39 12 7 10 5 230 226 1.02 1193
4.0 6 Taft 40 39 9 14 5 84 108 .78 1170
16.0 7 Cerro Coso 36 24 3 14 4 175 129 1.36 896
4.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 29 7 1 7 4 42 45 .93 777
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
16.0 1 Cerro Coso 36 36 179.2 347 463 365 14.22
4.0 2 West Hills Coalinga 29 29 147.0 265 258 157 7.48
4.0 2 Taft 40 40 229.2 382 302 229 6.98
23.0 4 Merced 39 39 239.2 280 165 151 4.41
7.0 5 Fresno City 41 41 249.0 317 191 151 4.24
4.0 6 Porterville 41 41 260.2 318 159 118 3.17
10.0 7 Sequoias 44 44 272.1 227 109 82 2.11
12.0 8 Reedley 44 44 283.2 230 109 83 2.05
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
7.0 1 Fresno City 41 41 95 2.67 22 1.66
23.0 2 Merced 39 39 141 4.12 12 1.50
12.0 3 Reedley 44 44 244 6.02 15 1.14
10.0 4 Sequoias 44 44 169 4.34 9 1.06
16.0 5 Cerro Coso 36 36 93 3.62 13 -
4.0 6 Porterville 41 41 81 2.18 13 -
4.0 6 Taft 40 40 65 1.98 22 -
4.0 6 West Hills Coalinga 29 29 69 3.29 10 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
12.0 1 Reedley 44 1119 819 256 44 9 .961
10.0 2 Sequoias 44 1164 819 296 49 12 .958
4.0 3 Porterville 41 1195 778 364 53 13 .956
7.0 4 Fresno City 41 1195 771 365 59 4 .951
23.0 5 Merced 39 1012 700 262 50 5 .951
4.0 6 Taft 40 1154 714 354 86 37 .925
4.0 6 West Hills Coalinga 29 1041 480 457 104 24 .900
16.0 8 Cerro Coso 36 870 539 244 87 28 .900
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
12.0 1 Reedley 44 1 24 14 .368 0
4.0 2 Taft 40 10 44 12 .214 0
16.0 3 Cerro Coso 36 7 80 16 .167 0
7.0 4 Fresno City 41 6 34 6 .150 0
23.0 5 Merced 39 5 55 9 .141 0
4.0 6 Porterville 41 5 45 4 .082 0
10.0 7 Sequoias 44 4 48 3 .059 1
4.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 29 1 72 2 .027 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
16.0 1 Cerro Coso 15.0 464,530 30,969
12.0 2 Reedley 21.0 1,810 87
10.0 3 Sequoias 19.0 900 48
23.0 4 Merced 20.0 0 0
7.0 5 Fresno City 23.0 0 0
4.0 6 Porterville 15.0 0 0
4.0 6 Taft 18.0 - -
4.0 6 West Hills Coalinga 16.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
7.0 1 Reedley 21 557 195 111 71 34 .350 .428 .469
14.0 2 Merced 21 574 191 126 86 65 .333 .425 .444
8.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 433 120 49 29 104 .277 .335 .386
5.0 4 Sequoias 21 576 209 140 54 50 .363 .436 .538
0.0 5 Porterville 21 554 148 93 91 91 .267 .377 .392
7.0 6 Fresno City 21 556 173 144 90 46 .311 .416 .500
1.0 7 Taft 21 492 112 81 45 98 .228 .308 .348
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 480 101 54 61 90 .210 .308 .267
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
14.0 1 Merced 21 27 14 3 44
8.0 2 Cerro Coso 21 22 8 3 33
7.0 3 Reedley 21 34 7 6 47
5.0 4 Sequoias 21 40 5 17 62
7.0 5 Fresno City 21 49 7 14 70
0.0 6 Porterville 21 30 0 13 43
1.0 7 Taft 21 18 1 13 32
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 14 2 3 19
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
7.0 1 Reedley 21 142 261 48 5
7.0 1 Fresno City 21 165 278 27 2
0.0 3 Porterville 21 114 217 12 3
1.0 4 Taft 21 100 171 27 4
5.0 5 Sequoias 21 170 310 10 9
14.0 6 Merced 21 137 255 34 4
8.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 67 167 43 17
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 65 128 14 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
5.0 1 Sequoias 21 23 3 25 2 85 141 .60 681
7.0 2 Reedley 21 9 5 21 4 124 109 1.14 663
0.0 3 Porterville 21 11 7 20 - 47 53 .89 683
7.0 4 Fresno City 21 18 11 22 - 36 67 .54 697
14.0 5 Merced 21 9 4 9 3 90 115 .78 682
1.0 6 Taft 21 14 4 12 - 28 46 .61 567
8.0 7 Cerro Coso 21 9 0 6 2 60 57 1.05 477
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 7 1 5 3 26 29 .90 554
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
8.0 1 Cerro Coso 21 21 100.1 192 269 208 14.51
2.0 2 West Hills Coalinga 21 21 109.0 194 182 103 6.61
1.0 3 Taft 21 21 121.2 201 169 126 7.25
14.0 4 Merced 21 21 127.2 137 79 72 3.95
7.0 5 Fresno City 21 21 133.0 153 80 60 3.16
0.0 6 Porterville 21 21 138.2 159 69 52 2.63
5.0 7 Sequoias 21 21 131.1 95 44 27 1.44
7.0 8 Reedley 21 21 135.0 96 47 37 1.92
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
7.0 1 Fresno City 21 21 58 3.05 12 1.54
14.0 2 Merced 21 21 91 4.99 6 1.46
7.0 3 Reedley 21 21 143 7.41 11 0.99
5.0 4 Sequoias 21 21 89 4.74 4 0.89
8.0 5 Cerro Coso 21 21 54 3.77 11 -
0.0 6 Porterville 21 21 42 2.12 5 -
1.0 7 Taft 21 21 38 2.19 13 -
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 21 53 3.40 9 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
7.0 1 Reedley 21 530 410 106 14 6 .974
5.0 2 Sequoias 21 589 397 163 29 7 .951
0.0 3 Porterville 21 656 421 206 29 7 .956
7.0 4 Fresno City 21 648 404 210 34 2 .948
14.0 5 Merced 21 544 374 144 26 4 .952
1.0 6 Taft 21 657 377 233 47 19 .928
2.0 7 West Hills Coalinga 21 809 373 351 85 24 .895
8.0 8 Cerro Coso 21 502 304 146 52 19 .896
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
7.0 1 Reedley 21 1 10 6 .375 0
1.0 2 Taft 21 5 25 9 .265 0
8.0 3 Cerro Coso 21 4 49 10 .169 0
7.0 4 Fresno City 21 3 15 5 .250 0
14.0 5 Merced 21 2 26 6 .188 0
0.0 6 Porterville 21 2 27 1 .036 0
5.0 7 Sequoias 21 3 21 2 .087 0
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 21 1 42 2 .045 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
8.0 1 Cerro Coso 10.0 333,368 33,337
7.0 2 Reedley 12.0 1,074 90
5.0 3 Sequoias 11.0 550 50
14.0 4 Merced 10.0 0 0
7.0 5 Fresno City 10.0 - -
0.0 6 Porterville 10.0 0 0
1.0 7 Taft 9.0 - -
2.0 8 West Hills Coalinga 12.0 0 0