California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	1262	494	335	103	86	.391	.444	.595
0.3087686567164179 2	East Los Angeles	40	1072	331	196	105	130	.309	.384	.404
0.30845323741007197 3	Pasadena City	41	1112	343	190	119	165	.308	.384	.405
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	949	273	136	70	108	.288	.346	.397
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	950	250	107	76	137	.263	.327	.306

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	98	18	41	157
0.2876712328767123 2	Chaffey	38	54	19	4	77
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	40	52	13	8	73
0.30845323741007197 4	Pasadena City	41	35	21	10	66
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	34	2	1	37

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	366	751	119	8
0.30845323741007197 2	Pasadena City	41	237	450	95	18
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	40	224	433	31	5
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	178	377	50	17
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	136	291	33	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	36	26	26	6	283	361	.78	1453
0.30845323741007197 2	Pasadena City	41	23	9	30	9	304	249	1.22	1293
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	40	30	7	46	1	181	109	1.66	1260
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	20	10	38	4	229	234	.98	1087
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	16	4	40	8	239	202	1.18	1086

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.2876712328767123 1	Chaffey	38	38	237.2	334	251	194	5.71
0.2631578947368421 2	Rio Hondo	39	39	233.1	374	259	173	5.19
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	40	40	247.2	344	217	172	4.86
0.30845323741007197 4	Pasadena City	41	41	265.1	267	150	114	3.01
0.39144215530903326 5	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	286.1	194	103	77	1.88

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	46	310	7.58	13	1.09
0.3087686567164179 2	East Los Angeles	40	40	91	2.57	15	-
0.30845323741007197 3	Pasadena City	41	41	138	3.64	15	-
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	38	81	2.39	15	-
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	39	93	2.79	11	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	1120	851	227	42	7	.963
0.30845323741007197 2	Pasadena City	41	1098	796	257	45	7	.959
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	40	995	636	300	59	5	.941
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	1066	663	310	93	8	.913
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	39	1125	683	341	101	9	.910

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	46	6	14	7	.333	0
0.2631578947368421 2	Rio Hondo	39	6	63	11	.149	0
0.30845323741007197 3	Pasadena City	41	13	42	6	.125	2
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	38	15	58	7	.108	-
0.3087686567164179 5	East Los Angeles	40	5	61	1	.016	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.39144215530903326 1	Mt. San Antonio	22.0	1,974	90
0.30845323741007197 2	Pasadena City	15.0	942	63
0.3087686567164179 3	East Los Angeles	18.0	732	41
0.2876712328767123 4	Chaffey	16.0	25	2
0.2631578947368421 5	Rio Hondo	19.0	25	2

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	337	150	116	25	13	.445	.497	.674
0.3 2	East Los Angeles	12	330	99	47	27	39	.300	.364	.361
0.3421828908554572 3	Pasadena City	12	339	116	67	25	45	.342	.397	.442
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	302	88	41	25	34	.291	.353	.401
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	294	72	30	28	26	.245	.321	.299

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	33	4	12	49
0.2913907284768212 2	Chaffey	12	21	3	2	26
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	12	15	1	1	17
0.3421828908554572 4	Pasadena City	12	15	5	3	23
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	13	-	1	14

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	127	227	39	2
0.3421828908554572 2	Pasadena City	12	78	150	31	5
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	12	48	119	9	-
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	55	121	14	4
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	32	88	10	1

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	17	7	3	2	71	82	.87	389
0.3421828908554572 2	Pasadena City	12	8	3	8	4	85	76	1.12	383
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	12	8	3	17	1	63	48	1.31	385
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	5	2	16	2	64	74	.86	350
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	5	-	21	2	88	76	1.16	348

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.2913907284768212 1	Chaffey	12	12	75.1	121	92	74	6.88
0.24489795918367346 2	Rio Hondo	12	12	77.1	125	84	60	5.43
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	12	12	76.0	140	90	71	6.54
0.3421828908554572 4	Pasadena City	12	12	76.2	91	56	40	3.65
0.44510385756676557 5	Mt. San Antonio	12	12	68.0	48	20	14	1.44

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	12	66	6.79	1	1.10
0.3 2	East Los Angeles	12	12	16	1.47	6	-
0.3421828908554572 3	Pasadena City	12	12	34	3.10	5	-
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	12	14	1.30	6	-
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	12	22	1.99	1	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	272	196	62	14	4	.949
0.3421828908554572 2	Pasadena City	12	332	230	85	17	3	.949
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	12	297	194	82	21	2	.929
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	337	202	101	34	4	.899
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	12	378	224	120	34	2	.910

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	2	3	3	.500	-
0.24489795918367346 2	Rio Hondo	12	4	25	4	.138	-
0.3421828908554572 3	Pasadena City	12	2	18	-	-	2
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	12	2	27	4	.129	-
0.3 5	East Los Angeles	12	1	30	1	.032	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.44510385756676557 1	Mt. San Antonio	6.0	517	87
0.3421828908554572 2	Pasadena City	6.0	392	66
0.3 3	East Los Angeles	6.0	312	52
0.2913907284768212 4	Chaffey	6.0	25	5
0.24489795918367346 5	Rio Hondo	6.0	25	5