Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
88.16129032258064 1 San Diego City 31 1000-2131 46.9 234-637 36.7 498-729 68.3 88.2
85.93103448275862 2 Southwestern 29 856-1786 47.9 240-620 38.7 321-503 63.8 85.9
76.28571428571429 3 San Diego Miramar 28 770-1725 44.6 240-660 36.4 356-470 75.7 76.3
76.17241379310344 4 Palomar 29 783-1884 41.6 287-787 36.5 354-493 71.8 76.2
72.28571428571429 5 San Diego Mesa 28 771-1804 42.7 169-536 31.5 313-540 58.0 72.3
70.17857142857143 6 MiraCosta 28 720-1694 42.5 195-574 34.0 331-514 64.4 70.2
69.0 7 Grossmont 28 698-1622 43.0 153-525 29.1 365-541 67.5 69.0
61.357142857142854 8 Cuyamaca 28 610-1524 40.0 199-607 32.8 300-423 70.9 61.4
60.42857142857143 9 Imperial Valley 28 602-1702 35.4 191-647 29.5 297-434 68.4 60.4
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
14.419354838709678 1 San Diego City 31 14.4 29.9 44.4 9.1
13.03448275862069 2 Palomar 29 13.0 24.3 37.3 2.2
12.413793103448276 3 Southwestern 29 12.4 29.9 42.3 6.5
12.107142857142858 4 San Diego Mesa 28 12.1 27.0 39.1 0.2
11.428571428571429 5 MiraCosta 28 11.4 22.8 34.2 -0.8
10.535714285714286 6 Imperial Valley 28 10.5 21.9 32.4 -6.5
10.071428571428571 7 San Diego Miramar 28 10.1 25.1 35.1 0.7
9.607142857142858 8 Grossmont 28 9.6 24.2 33.8 -6.2
7.464285714285714 9 Cuyamaca 28 7.5 23.8 31.2 -5.6
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
13.285714285714286 1 Cuyamaca 28 13.3 5.1 3.3 11.8
13.758620689655173 2 Southwestern 29 13.8 8.9 6.3 17.1
13.857142857142858 3 MiraCosta 28 13.9 9.1 3.3 13.3
13.862068965517242 4 Palomar 29 13.9 10.0 1.3 14.9
14.464285714285714 5 San Diego Miramar 28 14.5 6.9 2.1 14.0
15.709677419354838 6 San Diego City 31 15.7 11.5 5.0 18.3
16.428571428571427 7 San Diego Mesa 28 16.4 8.2 2.5 15.7
17.964285714285715 8 Grossmont 28 18.0 6.0 2.1 14.1
19.785714285714285 9 Imperial Valley 28 19.8 5.3 2.7 9.5
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
1.077893906527312 1 San Diego City 31 19.6 1.078 0.199
0.9085351516576534 2 Grossmont 28 14.8 0.909 -0.233
0.9049249407426916 3 Cuyamaca 28 2.2 0.905 -0.217
-0.217 4 Imperial Valley 28 17.5 - -
- 5 MiraCosta 28 17.2 - -
- 5 Palomar 29 18.4 - -
- 5 San Diego Mesa 28 13.7 - -
- 5 San Diego Miramar 28 17.1 - -
- 5 Southwestern 29 10.9 - -
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
88.25 1 Imperial Valley 28 846-1749 48.4 215-590 36.4 88.3
85.42857142857143 2 Grossmont 28 876-1875 46.7 277-729 38.0 85.4
76.71428571428571 3 San Diego Mesa 28 815-1836 44.4 199-591 33.7 76.7
75.0 4 Cuyamaca 28 806-1727 46.7 239-645 37.1 75.0
73.46428571428571 5 San Diego Miramar 28 687-1640 41.9 169-562 30.1 73.5
70.87096774193549 6 San Diego City 31 791-1865 42.4 173-573 30.2 70.9
70.03448275862068 7 Palomar 29 720-1675 43.0 206-608 33.9 70.0
66.75862068965517 8 Southwestern 29 697-1887 36.9 192-671 28.6 66.8
65.82142857142857 9 MiraCosta 28 651-1572 41.4 157-499 31.5 65.8
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
27.107142857142858 1 San Diego Mesa 28 11.8 27.1 38.9 0.2
27.071428571428573 2 Grossmont 28 13.0 27.1 40.0 -6.2
26.785714285714285 3 Imperial Valley 28 12.1 26.8 38.9 -6.5
25.25 4 Cuyamaca 28 11.6 25.3 36.9 -5.6
25.142857142857142 5 MiraCosta 28 9.8 25.1 35.0 -0.8
25.06896551724138 6 Palomar 29 10.1 25.1 35.1 2.2
24.70967741935484 7 San Diego City 31 10.5 24.7 35.3 9.1
24.620689655172413 8 Southwestern 29 11.1 24.6 35.8 6.5
23.321428571428573 9 San Diego Miramar 28 11.1 23.3 34.5 0.7
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
20.483870967741936 1 San Diego City 31 20.5 8.1 3.3 12.8
18.642857142857142 2 MiraCosta 28 18.6 8.3 3.6 12.7
17.413793103448278 3 Palomar 29 17.4 6.6 3.7 12.4
15.142857142857142 4 San Diego Mesa 28 15.1 8.8 4.8 14.5
15.137931034482758 5 Southwestern 29 15.1 6.9 1.8 9.9
12.464285714285714 6 San Diego Miramar 28 12.5 7.5 2.6 12.5
12.178571428571429 7 Imperial Valley 28 12.2 11.1 3.1 17.8
11.821428571428571 8 Grossmont 28 11.8 9.8 4.2 18.7
10.25 9 Cuyamaca 28 10.3 7.2 2.3 16.1
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
18.258064516129032 1 San Diego City 31 18.3 0.879 0.199
16.107142857142858 2 Grossmont 28 16.1 1.141 -0.233
15.448275862068966 3 Southwestern 29 15.4 - -
14.931034482758621 4 Palomar 29 14.9 - -
14.071428571428571 5 San Diego Mesa 28 14.1 - -
14.0 6 MiraCosta 28 14.0 - -
13.535714285714286 7 Cuyamaca 28 13.5 1.121 -0.217
13.107142857142858 8 San Diego Miramar 28 13.1 - -
11.571428571428571 9 Imperial Valley 28 11.6 - -
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
93.3125 1 San Diego City 16 542-1151 47.1 136-356 38.2 272-382 71.2 93.3
87.625 2 Southwestern 16 446-913 48.8 117-313 37.4 174-255 68.2 87.6
74.125 3 San Diego Miramar 16 422-949 44.5 140-383 36.6 202-269 75.1 74.1
74.125 3 Palomar 16 421-1045 40.3 153-443 34.5 191-278 68.7 74.1
74.125 3 San Diego Mesa 16 453-1039 43.6 104-299 34.8 176-299 58.9 74.1
68.0 6 MiraCosta 16 399-936 42.6 100-319 31.3 191-287 66.6 68.0
70.0 7 Grossmont 16 414-938 44.1 76-276 27.5 214-308 69.5 70.0
61.9375 8 Cuyamaca 16 357-871 41.0 103-323 31.9 175-244 71.7 61.9
63.4375 9 Imperial Valley 16 364-1017 35.8 127-406 31.3 160-229 69.9 63.4
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
14.625 1 San Diego City 16 14.6 30.9 45.6 12.9
12.6875 2 Palomar 16 12.7 22.8 35.4 -0.1
11.5 3 Southwestern 16 11.5 28.4 39.9 5.3
12.375 4 San Diego Mesa 16 12.4 26.1 38.4 0.0
10.6875 5 MiraCosta 16 10.7 21.4 32.1 -0.1
10.125 6 Imperial Valley 16 10.1 21.9 32.1 -4.7
8.125 7 San Diego Miramar 16 8.1 23.3 31.4 -3.1
9.6875 8 Grossmont 16 9.7 24.4 34.1 -6.1
7.75 9 Cuyamaca 16 7.8 24.1 31.8 -4.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
13.3125 1 Cuyamaca 16 13.3 4.6 3.3 11.8
10.875 2 Southwestern 16 10.9 7.2 6.1 15.5
12.5 3 MiraCosta 16 12.5 8.4 2.9 11.5
12.1875 4 Palomar 16 12.2 10.6 1.6 13.8
14.0625 5 San Diego Miramar 16 14.1 6.8 2.3 14.3
15.625 6 San Diego City 16 15.6 12.5 5.5 19.6
14.9375 7 San Diego Mesa 16 14.9 8.3 3.0 17.7
17.0625 8 Grossmont 16 17.1 6.2 2.5 13.3
18.8125 9 Imperial Valley 16 18.8 5.4 2.8 9.6
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
1.0994108983799706 1 San Diego City 16 19.5 1.099 0.238
0.9256198347107438 2 Grossmont 16 13.9 0.926 -0.194
0.9158964879852126 3 Cuyamaca 16 1.8 0.916 -0.200
-0.200 4 Imperial Valley 16 17.3 - -
- 5 MiraCosta 16 14.3 - -
- 5 Palomar 16 16.6 - -
- 5 San Diego Mesa 16 12.0 - -
- 5 San Diego Miramar 16 16.5 - -
- 5 Southwestern 16 9.9 - -
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
90.0 1 Imperial Valley 16 487-985 49.4 126-333 37.8 90.0
83.25 2 Grossmont 16 494-1087 45.4 161-423 38.1 83.3
75.1875 3 San Diego Mesa 16 456-1019 44.7 107-336 31.8 75.2
76.0 4 Cuyamaca 16 464-1019 45.5 160-420 38.1 76.0
76.125 5 San Diego Miramar 16 407-952 42.8 99-312 31.7 76.1
69.3125 6 San Diego City 16 394-946 41.6 88-284 31.0 69.3
68.9375 7 Palomar 16 390-928 42.0 112-329 34.0 68.9
64.875 8 Southwestern 16 371-1040 35.7 113-405 27.9 64.9
63.0 9 MiraCosta 16 355-883 40.2 90-276 32.6 63.0
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
26.3125 1 San Diego Mesa 16 12.1 26.3 38.4 0.0
26.75 2 Grossmont 16 13.5 26.8 40.3 -6.1
26.375 3 Imperial Valley 16 10.4 26.4 36.8 -4.7
24.8125 4 Cuyamaca 16 11.1 24.8 35.9 -4.1
23.1875 5 MiraCosta 16 9.1 23.2 32.3 -0.1
25.375 6 Palomar 16 10.1 25.4 35.5 -0.1
22.9375 7 San Diego City 16 9.7 22.9 32.6 12.9
23.5 8 Southwestern 16 11.1 23.5 34.6 5.3
24.0625 9 San Diego Miramar 16 10.5 24.1 34.6 -3.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
20.875 1 San Diego City 16 20.9 7.1 3.4 12.1
18.0625 2 MiraCosta 16 18.1 8.5 3.6 12.1
17.125 3 Palomar 16 17.1 6.3 3.6 11.6
14.6875 4 San Diego Mesa 16 14.7 8.0 4.8 14.0
13.6875 5 Southwestern 16 13.7 5.7 2.0 9.4
11.9375 6 San Diego Miramar 16 11.9 7.3 2.9 13.3
12.0625 7 Imperial Valley 16 12.1 10.3 3.2 17.8
11.3125 8 Grossmont 16 11.3 9.3 4.1 18.4
9.625 9 Cuyamaca 16 9.6 7.3 2.4 18.4
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
17.875 1 San Diego City 16 17.9 0.861 0.238
14.6875 2 Grossmont 16 14.7 1.119 -0.194
14.375 3 Southwestern 16 14.4 - -
13.375 4 Palomar 16 13.4 - -
13.0625 5 San Diego Mesa 16 13.1 - -
12.5625 6 MiraCosta 16 12.6 - -
12.6875 7 Cuyamaca 16 12.7 1.116 -0.200
12.375 8 San Diego Miramar 16 12.4 - -
10.75 9 Imperial Valley 16 10.8 - -