Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa 2b 3b hr xbh
0.3227808814400993 1 Fresno City 43 1611 520 387 236 322 .323 .432 .464 85 17 14 32 258 308 .84 1963 97 16 33 146
0.3100929614873838 2 Reedley 42 1506 467 283 240 271 .310 .423 .410 71 22 20 23 391 347 1.13 1859 77 13 16 106
0.29632248939179634 3 Taft 40 1414 419 267 224 303 .296 .416 .413 77 16 24 27 322 317 1.02 1755 66 9 27 102
0.2925824175824176 4 Sequoias 40 1456 426 231 152 280 .293 .377 .397 53 11 15 39 381 319 1.19 1687 79 8 19 106
0.25875625446747674 5 Merced 41 1399 362 221 160 311 .259 .361 .371 70 10 34 30 395 297 1.33 1673 62 10 25 97
0.25605282465150403 6 Porterville 40 1363 349 208 178 347 .256 .365 .335 64 13 23 19 276 360 .77 1641 64 7 10 81
0.25 7 Coalinga 36 1168 292 154 157 259 .250 .361 .330 53 12 14 38 316 264 1.20 1404 56 11 5 72
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3227808814400993 1 Fresno City 43 433 748 47 22
0.3100929614873838 2 Reedley 42 341 618 48 11
0.29632248939179634 3 Taft 40 308 584 65 30
0.25875625446747674 4 Merced 41 267 519 57 13
0.2925824175824176 5 Sequoias 40 258 578 20 10
0.25605282465150403 6 Porterville 40 230 457 40 11
0.25 7 Coalinga 36 172 385 74 19
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
0.25 1 Coalinga 9.11 2 32 36 36 0 304.1 417 348 308 182 182 5.38 22 1.97 - 30 85
0.25605282465150403 2 Porterville 8.05 17 22 40 40 7 350.0 421 341 313 265 266 6.84 18 1.96 - 52 91
0.29632248939179634 3 Taft 7.66 20 20 40 40 6 353.2 487 363 301 173 274 6.97 27 1.87 - 65 67
0.2925824175824176 4 Sequoias 7.49 18 22 40 40 10 355.2 485 331 296 190 231 5.85 36 1.90 - 45 38
0.25875625446747674 5 Merced 5.92 20 20 41 41 10 358.2 370 267 236 202 313 7.85 26 1.59 - 34 67
0.3100929614873838 6 Reedley 5.80 24 18 42 42 9 369.0 376 294 238 254 378 9.22 26 1.71 - 41 45
0.3227808814400993 7 Fresno City 5.46 31 12 43 43 9 391.0 410 270 237 171 413 9.51 14 1.49 - 58 63
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3227808814400993 1 Fresno City 43 1614 1165 402 47 31 .971 31 50 6 .107 1
0.25875625446747674 2 Merced 41 1551 1076 427 48 16 .969 36 43 13 .232 0
0.2925824175824176 3 Sequoias 40 1504 1067 377 60 7 .960 27 28 26 .481 0
0.29632248939179634 4 Taft 40 1545 1054 419 72 25 .953 33 52 8 .133 0
0.25605282465150403 5 Porterville 40 1523 1048 392 83 76 .946 26 115 10 .080 0
0.3100929614873838 6 Reedley 42 1583 1107 389 87 19 .945 21 29 18 .383 3
0.25 7 Coalinga 36 1375 909 362 104 29 .924 32 43 18 .295 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.3100929614873838 1 Reedley 20 1,712 86
0.29632248939179634 2 Taft 18 1,085 61
0.3227808814400993 3 Fresno City 21 0 0
0.2925824175824176 4 Sequoias 25 0 0
0.25875625446747674 5 Merced 15 0 0
0.25605282465150403 6 Porterville 21 0 0
0.25 7 Coalinga 17 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa 2b 3b hr xbh
0.3517534537725824 1 Fresno City 24 941 331 259 154 159 .352 .460 .504 48 16 7 19 125 174 .72 1166 56 12 21 89
0.3115124153498871 2 Reedley 24 886 276 161 143 153 .312 .423 .406 39 15 10 17 221 211 1.05 1093 50 8 6 64
0.3044496487119438 3 Taft 24 854 260 175 133 170 .304 .418 .443 41 10 14 18 182 197 .92 1052 42 5 22 69
0.30293159609120524 4 Sequoias 24 921 279 146 87 154 .303 .376 .413 24 5 9 23 252 202 1.25 1046 55 5 12 72
0.29093050647820967 5 Merced 24 849 247 163 98 175 .291 .388 .429 41 6 23 21 213 184 1.16 1017 48 6 19 73
0.2575210589651023 6 Porterville 24 831 214 118 99 205 .258 .357 .329 33 7 18 14 176 216 .81 988 36 4 5 45
0.26362484157160965 7 Coalinga 24 789 208 116 105 169 .264 .374 .357 38 6 12 27 211 171 1.23 950 39 10 5 54
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3517534537725824 1 Fresno City 24 291 474 29 13
0.3115124153498871 2 Reedley 24 198 360 27 4
0.3044496487119438 3 Taft 24 196 378 30 17
0.29093050647820967 4 Merced 24 199 364 38 8
0.30293159609120524 5 Sequoias 24 162 380 13 5
0.2575210589651023 6 Porterville 24 131 273 15 8
0.26362484157160965 7 Coalinga 24 128 282 42 16
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
0.26362484157160965 1 Coalinga 10.54 1 22 24 24 0 205.0 304 274 240 132 117 5.14 20 2.13 - 22 52
0.2575210589651023 2 Porterville 7.90 10 14 24 24 3 212.0 256 202 186 148 150 6.37 10 1.91 - 34 56
0.3044496487119438 3 Taft 6.71 14 10 24 24 5 214.2 287 194 160 96 149 6.25 14 1.78 - 40 40
0.30293159609120524 4 Sequoias 7.76 11 13 24 24 7 215.2 318 202 186 99 148 6.18 17 1.93 - 26 25
0.29093050647820967 5 Merced 4.49 16 7 24 24 8 214.2 198 121 107 107 197 8.26 12 1.42 - 15 35
0.3115124153498871 6 Reedley 5.29 13 11 24 24 5 216.0 220 171 127 146 201 8.38 11 1.69 - 25 22
0.3517534537725824 7 Fresno City 4.77 18 6 24 24 4 219.0 229 141 116 91 224 9.21 6 1.46 - 26 32
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3517534537725824 1 Fresno City 24 936 660 250 26 22 .972 21 28 3 .097 1
0.29093050647820967 2 Merced 24 922 644 254 24 6 .974 23 12 9 .429 0
0.30293159609120524 3 Sequoias 24 933 647 253 33 4 .965 16 18 14 .438 0
0.3044496487119438 4 Taft 24 956 637 273 46 13 .952 26 33 4 .108 0
0.2575210589651023 5 Porterville 24 927 635 243 49 44 .947 17 67 6 .082 0
0.3115124153498871 6 Reedley 24 963 648 252 63 17 .935 13 13 11 .458 3
0.26362484157160965 7 Coalinga 24 917 611 231 75 17 .918 23 23 11 .324 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.3115124153498871 1 Reedley 12 1,027 86
0.3044496487119438 2 Taft 12 710 60
0.3517534537725824 3 Fresno City 12 0 0
0.30293159609120524 4 Sequoias 12 0 0
0.29093050647820967 5 Merced 12 0 0
0.2575210589651023 6 Porterville 12 0 0
0.26362484157160965 7 Coalinga 12 0 0