Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.32503457814661135 1 Mission 40 1446 470 349 257 263 .325 .437 .499
0.2943444730077121 2 San Mateo 45 1556 458 288 233 308 .294 .399 .447
0.29102167182662536 3 De Anza 37 1292 376 204 183 285 .291 .385 .416
0.27071823204419887 4 San Francisco 38 1267 343 165 154 290 .271 .371 .350
0.2696709585121602 5 Chabot 40 1398 377 256 172 314 .270 .382 .395
0.251896813353566 6 West Valley 39 1318 332 180 150 283 .252 .351 .339
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
161.0 1 Mission 40 104 23 34 161
155.0 2 San Mateo 45 106 15 34 155
105.0 3 De Anza 37 71 11 23 105
102.0 4 Chabot 40 61 9 32 102
87.0 5 West Valley 39 70 6 11 87
71.0 6 San Francisco 38 51 11 9 71
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
397.0 1 Mission 40 397 722 85 20
320.0 2 San Mateo 45 320 696 62 10
280.0 3 Chabot 40 280 552 51 14
234.0 4 De Anza 37 234 538 73 21
214.0 5 West Valley 39 214 447 20 7
192.0 6 San Francisco 38 192 443 42 21
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1888.0 1 San Mateo 45 51 21 27 24 341 452 .75 1888
1808.0 2 Mission 40 55 32 18 12 318 392 .81 1808
1701.0 3 Chabot 40 93 16 22 17 303 396 .77 1701
1557.0 4 West Valley 39 58 12 19 19 316 375 .84 1557
1548.0 5 De Anza 37 30 25 18 21 321 326 .98 1548
1504.0 6 San Francisco 38 53 8 22 18 352 280 1.26 1504
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
8.205338809034908 1 San Francisco 38 38 324.2 457 352 296 8.21
7.552254098360656 2 De Anza 37 37 325.1 416 346 273 7.55
6.07177033492823 3 Chabot 40 40 348.1 415 257 235 6.07
5.58974358974359 4 Mission 40 40 351.0 391 276 218 5.59
5.245562130177515 5 West Valley 39 39 338.0 345 240 197 5.25
3.834586466165413 6 San Mateo 45 45 399.0 337 203 170 3.83
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
1.9804928131416837 1 San Francisco 38 38 127 3.52 25 1.98
1.896516393442623 2 De Anza 37 37 249 6.89 31 1.90
1.6622009569377991 3 Chabot 40 40 287 7.42 22 1.66
1.5954415954415955 4 Mission 40 40 291 7.46 18 1.60
1.5680473372781065 5 West Valley 39 39 284 7.56 15 1.57
1.330827067669173 6 San Mateo 45 45 355 8.01 17 1.33
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9701230228471002 1 San Mateo 45 1707 1197 459 51 13 .970
0.9679572763684913 2 Chabot 40 1498 1045 405 48 7 .968
0.9649965682910089 3 West Valley 39 1457 1014 392 51 18 .965
0.9515915119363395 4 Mission 40 1508 1053 382 73 9 .952
0.951048951048951 5 San Francisco 38 1430 974 386 70 12 .951
0.9397590361445783 6 De Anza 37 1411 976 350 85 30 .940
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.2926829268292683 1 West Valley 39 28 58 24 .293 -
0.2777777777777778 2 Chabot 40 15 39 15 .278 1
0.20588235294117646 3 San Mateo 45 33 54 14 .206 -
0.18095238095238095 4 San Francisco 38 10 86 19 .181 1
0.14473684210526316 5 Mission 40 21 65 11 .145 -
0.1267605633802817 6 De Anza 37 17 62 9 .127 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
15029.0 1 Mission 14 210,400 15,029
141.0 2 San Mateo 24 3,384 141
87.0 3 De Anza 18 1,560 87
68.0 4 West Valley 18 1,219 68
36.0 5 Chabot 13 462 36
23.0 6 San Francisco 17 385 23
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.34054054054054056 1 Mission 20 740 252 194 120 125 .341 .446 .536
0.3130311614730878 2 San Mateo 20 706 221 144 95 119 .313 .405 .470
0.2959459459459459 3 De Anza 21 740 219 136 106 159 .296 .394 .420
0.2606060606060606 4 San Francisco 20 660 172 67 74 158 .261 .360 .317
0.3005698005698006 5 Chabot 20 702 211 165 106 129 .301 .428 .453
0.28328611898017 6 West Valley 20 706 200 110 82 131 .283 .380 .381
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
91.0 1 Mission 20 58 12 21 91
71.0 2 San Mateo 20 48 6 17 71
62.0 3 De Anza 21 44 6 12 62
61.0 4 Chabot 20 34 8 19 61
51.0 5 West Valley 20 40 4 7 51
27.0 6 San Francisco 20 21 2 4 27
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
220.0 1 Mission 20 220 397 42 11
161.0 2 San Mateo 20 161 332 27 3
183.0 3 Chabot 20 183 318 35 8
151.0 4 De Anza 21 151 311 45 11
135.0 5 West Valley 20 135 269 12 3
81.0 6 San Francisco 20 81 209 18 12
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
847.0 1 San Mateo 20 22 12 12 11 150 216 .69 847
913.0 2 Mission 20 31 13 9 5 153 202 .76 913
889.0 3 Chabot 20 58 11 12 8 148 212 .70 889
840.0 4 West Valley 20 33 9 10 11 162 209 .78 840
889.0 5 De Anza 21 21 12 10 12 182 186 .98 889
780.0 6 San Francisco 20 30 2 14 11 188 144 1.31 780
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
9.01747572815534 1 San Francisco 20 20 171.2 257 214 172 9.02
7.952727272727272 2 De Anza 21 21 183.1 237 206 162 7.95
5.965714285714285 3 Chabot 20 20 175.0 222 124 116 5.97
6.903409090909092 4 Mission 20 20 176.0 230 164 135 6.90
5.500934579439252 5 West Valley 20 20 178.1 187 134 109 5.50
3.640449438202247 6 San Mateo 20 20 178.0 135 85 72 3.64
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
2.1786407766990292 1 San Francisco 20 20 56 2.94 14 2.18
1.8981818181818182 2 De Anza 21 21 142 6.97 17 1.90
1.7428571428571429 3 Chabot 20 20 163 8.38 13 1.74
1.8352272727272727 4 Mission 20 20 149 7.62 12 1.84
1.6261682242990654 5 West Valley 20 20 161 8.13 11 1.63
1.2247191011235956 6 San Mateo 20 20 154 7.79 12 1.22
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9702457956015524 1 San Mateo 20 773 534 216 23 5 .970
0.9664429530201343 2 Chabot 20 745 525 195 25 2 .966
0.9593709043250328 3 West Valley 20 763 535 197 31 4 .959
0.9583892617449664 4 Mission 20 745 528 186 31 2 .958
0.9456233421750663 5 San Francisco 20 754 515 198 41 5 .946
0.9351969504447268 6 De Anza 21 787 550 186 51 20 .935
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.24444444444444444 1 West Valley 20 15 34 11 .244 -
0.4090909090909091 2 Chabot 20 6 13 9 .409 1
0.24 3 San Mateo 20 15 19 6 .240 -
0.15151515151515152 4 San Francisco 20 4 56 10 .152 1
0.2692307692307692 5 Mission 20 10 19 7 .269 -
0.05128205128205128 6 De Anza 21 10 37 2 .051 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
15000.0 1 Mission 10 150,000 15,000
133.0 2 San Mateo 10 1,326 133
77.0 3 De Anza 11 840 77
71.0 4 West Valley 10 705 71
36.0 5 Chabot 10 360 36
37.0 6 San Francisco 9 330 37