California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
297.0 1	San Diego Mesa	41	1444	478	272	154	221	.331	.412	.424
324.0 2	Palomar	45	1623	531	287	175	229	.327	.413	.430
293.0 3	Southwestern	41	1478	456	265	184	233	.309	.392	.430
314.0 4	Grossmont	40	1450	428	259	202	280	.295	.394	.457
283.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	40	1442	420	241	169	214	.291	.382	.388
245.0 6	San Diego City	39	1379	385	197	123	234	.279	.352	.371
246.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	40	1406	390	229	169	314	.277	.376	.405
163.0 8	Imperial Valley	38	1232	319	142	109	301	.259	.337	.329
200.0 9	Desert	40	1359	349	168	147	260	.257	.357	.333

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
314.0 1	Grossmont	40	78	26	35	139
324.0 2	Palomar	45	98	21	9	128
246.0 3	Mt. San Jacinto	40	88	22	16	126
283.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	40	97	11	7	115
293.0 5	Southwestern	41	63	25	22	110
297.0 6	San Diego Mesa	41	81	10	11	102
245.0 7	San Diego City	39	67	21	6	94
200.0 8	Desert	40	64	6	9	79
163.0 9	Imperial Valley	38	52	11	4	67

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
324.0 1	Palomar	45	324	698	50	13
314.0 2	Grossmont	40	314	663	71	12
297.0 3	San Diego Mesa	41	297	612	60	15
293.0 4	Southwestern	41	293	635	31	12
283.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	40	283	560	50	20
246.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	40	246	570	31	10
245.0 7	San Diego City	39	245	512	59	15
200.0 8	Desert	40	200	452	55	32
163.0 9	Imperial Valley	38	163	405	21	10

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
324.0 1	Palomar	45	80	25	57	21	422	397	1.06	1960
293.0 2	Southwestern	41	37	29	17	25	350	430	.81	1745
297.0 3	San Diego Mesa	41	57	16	64	29	413	367	1.13	1735
314.0 4	Grossmont	40	47	18	8	22	332	344	.97	1725
283.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	40	58	24	13	30	320	367	.87	1706
246.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	40	64	16	17	24	279	381	.73	1672
200.0 7	Desert	40	71	12	21	24	377	349	1.08	1610
245.0 8	San Diego City	39	40	14	16	25	359	372	.97	1572
163.0 9	Imperial Valley	38	38	4	3	39	336	219	1.53	1386

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
163.0 1	Imperial Valley	38	38	297.0	467	401	333	10.09
200.0 2	Desert	40	40	352.0	524	421	344	8.80
246.0 3	Mt. San Jacinto	40	40	337.0	425	323	243	6.49
283.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	40	40	358.0	460	303	235	5.91
245.0 5	San Diego City	39	39	341.2	391	285	205	5.40
297.0 6	San Diego Mesa	41	41	360.1	441	255	209	5.22
314.0 7	Grossmont	40	40	349.2	403	236	177	4.56
324.0 8	Palomar	45	45	401.0	411	216	160	3.59
293.0 9	Southwestern	41	41	367.2	359	180	146	3.57

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
324.0 1	Palomar	45	45	389	8.73	10	-
314.0 2	Grossmont	40	40	216	5.56	15	-
297.0 3	San Diego Mesa	41	41	259	6.47	15	-
293.0 4	Southwestern	41	41	267	6.54	12	-
283.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	40	40	255	6.41	20	-
246.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	40	40	204	5.45	15	-
245.0 7	San Diego City	39	39	315	8.30	17	-
200.0 8	Desert	40	40	197	5.04	27	-
163.0 9	Imperial Valley	38	38	137	4.15	17	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
297.0 1	San Diego Mesa	41	1567	1081	432	54	17	.966
293.0 2	Southwestern	41	1566	1103	404	59	13	.962
324.0 3	Palomar	45	1758	1171	520	67	14	.962
200.0 4	Desert	40	1513	1054	399	60	23	.960
163.0 5	Imperial Valley	38	1329	891	374	64	33	.952
245.0 6	San Diego City	39	1443	1025	342	76	12	.947
283.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	40	1600	1065	443	92	16	.943
246.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	40	1492	1011	395	86	23	.942
314.0 9	Grossmont	40	1567	1040	435	92	17	.941

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
297.0 1	San Diego Mesa	41	31	29	19	.396	1
324.0 2	Palomar	45	22	37	15	.288	1
283.0 3	San Bernardino Valley	40	30	45	17	.274	3
293.0 4	Southwestern	41	23	51	15	.227	-
245.0 5	San Diego City	39	22	58	17	.227	-
314.0 6	Grossmont	40	34	65	16	.198	3
246.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	40	25	64	14	.179	1
163.0 8	Imperial Valley	38	24	70	12	.146	1
200.0 9	Desert	40	33	93	15	.139	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
200.0 1	Desert	21	1,525	73
246.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	19	1,145	60
245.0 3	San Diego City	21	1,245	59
283.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	21	658	31
163.0 5	Imperial Valley	16	50	3
314.0 6	Grossmont	21	35	2
324.0 7	Palomar	24	0	0
297.0 8	San Diego Mesa	20	0	0
293.0 9	Southwestern	20	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
199.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	872	305	185	95	130	.350	.433	.438
201.0 2	Palomar	24	879	307	177	99	104	.349	.432	.462
165.0 3	Southwestern	24	863	255	148	102	129	.295	.380	.408
205.0 4	Grossmont	24	883	269	172	130	160	.305	.406	.467
185.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	24	867	256	150	120	134	.295	.400	.392
152.0 6	San Diego City	24	848	244	120	77	130	.288	.363	.373
175.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	856	259	164	117	175	.303	.407	.450
116.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	818	218	100	67	204	.267	.340	.346
136.0 9	Desert	24	827	229	115	86	138	.277	.367	.372

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
205.0 1	Grossmont	24	49	14	22	85
201.0 2	Palomar	24	55	13	6	74
175.0 3	Mt. San Jacinto	24	60	15	12	87
185.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	24	49	10	5	64
165.0 5	Southwestern	24	32	13	13	58
199.0 6	San Diego Mesa	24	49	5	6	60
152.0 7	San Diego City	24	37	13	3	53
136.0 8	Desert	24	46	6	7	59
116.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	33	10	4	47

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
201.0 1	Palomar	24	201	406	29	7
205.0 2	Grossmont	24	205	412	49	3
199.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	199	382	39	8
165.0 4	Southwestern	24	165	352	18	8
185.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	24	185	340	36	14
175.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	24	175	385	24	7
152.0 7	San Diego City	24	152	316	31	10
136.0 8	Desert	24	136	308	27	17
116.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	116	283	18	8

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
201.0 1	Palomar	24	45	20	33	12	215	229	.94	1076
165.0 2	Southwestern	24	25	14	8	18	198	261	.76	1012
199.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	40	9	38	17	226	232	.97	1054
205.0 4	Grossmont	24	31	14	3	15	202	201	1.00	1061
185.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	24	39	11	8	21	208	240	.87	1045
175.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	24	43	13	10	13	153	253	.60	1039
136.0 7	Desert	24	37	8	15	16	212	225	.94	973
152.0 8	San Diego City	24	29	10	12	17	219	245	.89	976
116.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	25	2	3	27	235	143	1.64	915

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
116.0 1	Imperial Valley	24	24	205.2	316	272	233	10.20
136.0 2	Desert	24	24	208.0	307	226	184	7.96
175.0 3	Mt. San Jacinto	24	24	201.0	254	189	141	6.31
185.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	24	24	213.0	268	166	129	5.45
152.0 5	San Diego City	24	24	210.0	253	178	123	5.27
199.0 6	San Diego Mesa	24	24	211.0	258	145	126	5.37
205.0 7	Grossmont	24	24	209.2	249	141	106	4.55
201.0 8	Palomar	24	24	214.0	200	103	80	3.36
165.0 9	Southwestern	24	24	216.2	222	103	88	3.66

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
201.0 1	Palomar	24	24	207	8.71	3	-
205.0 2	Grossmont	24	24	123	5.28	6	-
199.0 3	San Diego Mesa	24	24	162	6.91	8	-
165.0 4	Southwestern	24	24	154	6.40	5	-
185.0 5	San Bernardino Valley	24	24	147	6.21	9	-
175.0 6	Mt. San Jacinto	24	24	124	5.55	10	-
152.0 7	San Diego City	24	24	193	8.27	11	-
136.0 8	Desert	24	24	116	5.02	13	-
116.0 9	Imperial Valley	24	24	75	3.28	13	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
199.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	909	633	254	22	11	.976
165.0 2	Southwestern	24	920	650	235	35	7	.962
201.0 3	Palomar	24	910	610	272	28	8	.969
136.0 4	Desert	24	889	622	230	37	15	.958
116.0 5	Imperial Valley	24	905	617	243	45	15	.950
152.0 6	San Diego City	24	883	630	207	46	10	.948
185.0 7	San Bernardino Valley	24	950	631	269	50	8	.947
175.0 8	Mt. San Jacinto	24	879	603	229	47	8	.947
205.0 9	Grossmont	24	927	620	254	53	12	.943

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
199.0 1	San Diego Mesa	24	18	17	9	.346	-
201.0 2	Palomar	24	15	14	6	.300	1
185.0 3	San Bernardino Valley	24	21	28	8	.222	1
165.0 4	Southwestern	24	15	27	8	.229	-
152.0 5	San Diego City	24	12	37	11	.229	-
205.0 6	Grossmont	24	19	34	8	.190	1
175.0 7	Mt. San Jacinto	24	16	30	11	.268	-
116.0 8	Imperial Valley	24	19	40	9	.184	-
136.0 9	Desert	24	21	44	6	.120	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
136.0 1	Desert	12	858	72
175.0 2	Mt. San Jacinto	12	848	71
152.0 3	San Diego City	12	610	51
185.0 4	San Bernardino Valley	12	130	11
116.0 5	Imperial Valley	12	0	0
205.0 6	Grossmont	12	0	0
201.0 7	Palomar	12	0	0
199.0 8	San Diego Mesa	12	0	0
165.0 9	Southwestern	12	0	0